Modeling the Probability of MII Spindle Disruption in Bovine Oocytes as a Function of Total Osmolality Using Logistic Regression and Its Application toward Improved CPA Addition and Removal Procedures

Cell Preservation Technology

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 145-155

  Mullen, Steven F ^a   Agca, Yuksel ^a   Critser, John K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYOPROTECTIVE AGENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CATTLE; CELL DAMAGE; CELL PROTECTION; CELL ULTRASTRUCTURE; CELL VOLUME; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONFOCAL LASER MICROSCOPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; CULTURE MEDIUM; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METAPHASE; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OSMOLALITY; OSMOSIS; OSMOTIC STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; TECHNIQUE; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

ANIMALIA; BOS TAURUS; BOVINAE;

EID: 2142717336     PISSN: 1538344X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/153834404774101981     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Critser JK, Agca Y, Gunasena KT. The cryobiology of mammalian oocytes. In: Karow AM, Critser JK, eds. Reproductive Tissue Banking, Scientific Principles. San Diego: Academic Press; 1997:329-357.
2. Wassarman PM, Albertini DF. The mammalian ovum. In: Knobil EAN, ed. The Physiology of Reproduction. New York: Raven Press; 1994:79-122.
3. Sathananthan AH, Trounson A, Freemann L, et al. The effects of cooling human oocytes. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:968-977.
4. Songsasen N, Yu IJ, Ratterree MS, et al. Effect of chilling on the organization of tubulin and chromosomes in rhesus monkey oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:818-825.
5. Aman RR, Parks JE. Effects of cooling and rewarming on the meiotic spindle and chromosomes of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1994;50:103-110.
6. Moor RM, Crosby IM. Temperature-induced abnormalities in sheep oocytes during maturation. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;75:467-473.
7. De Smedt V, Crozet N, Ahmed-Ali M, et al. In vitro maturation and fertilization of goat oocytes. Theriogenology. 1992;37:1049-1060.
8. Liu RH, Sun QY, Li YH, et al. Effects of cooling on meiotic spindle structure and chromosome alignment within in vitro-matured porcine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2003;65:212-218.
9. Magistrini M, Szollosi D. Effects of cold and of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate on the second meiotic spindle of mouse oocytes. Eur J Cell Biol. 1980;22:699-707.
10. Joly C, Bchini O, Boulekbache H, et al. Effects of 1,2-propanediol on the cytoskeletal organization of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:374-378.
11. Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WI. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1101-1109.
12. Johnson MH, Pickering SJ. The effect of dimethylsulphoxide on the microtubular system of the mouse oocyte. Development. 1987;100:313-324.
13. Saunders KM, Parks JE. Effects of cryopreservation procedures on the cytology and fertilization rate of in vitro-matured bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1999;61:178-187.
14. Van der Elst J, Van den Abbeel E, Jacobs R, et al. Effect of 1,2-propanediol and dimethylsulphoxide on the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:960-967.
15. Pickering SJ, Johnson MH. The influence of cooling on the organization of the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:207-216.
16. Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH, et al. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil Steril. 1990;54:102-108.
17. Schroeder AC, Champlin AK, Mobraaten LE, et al. Developmental capacity of mouse oocytes cryopreserved before and after maturation in vitro. J Reprod Fertil. 1990;89:43-50.
18. Bond DJ, Chandley AC. Aneuploidy in man: the problem stated. Aneuploidy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983:4-26.
19. Kola I, Kirby C, Shaw J, et al. Vitrification of mouse oocytes results in aneuploid zygotes and malformed fetuses. Teratology. 1988;38:467-474.
20. Bos-Mikich A, Wood MJ, Candy CJ, et al. Cytogenetical analysis and developmental potential of vitrified mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 1995;53:780-785.
21. Mazur P. Cryobiology: the freezing of biological systems. Science. 1970;168:939-949.
22. Gao D, Critser JK. Mechanisms of cryoinjury in living cells. Ilar J. 2000;41:187-196.
23. Agca Y, Liu J, Peter AT, et al. Effect of developmental stage on bovine oocyte plasma membrane water and cryoprotectant permeability characteristics. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;49:408-415.
24. Gao DY, Ashworth E, Watson PF, et al. Hyperosmotic tolerance of human spermatozoa: separate effects of glycerol, sodium chloride, and sucrose on spermolysis. Biol Reprod. 1993;49:112-123.
25. Gilmore JA, Du J, Tao J, et al. Osmotic properties of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. J Reprod Fertil. 1996;107:87-95.
26. Pegg DE, Hunt CJ, Fong LP. Osmotic properties of the rabbit corneal endothelium and their relevance to cryopreservation. Cell Biophys. 1987;10:169-189.
27. + cells and their application to cryopreservation. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000;9:161-173.
28. Mazur P, Schneider U. Osmotic responses of preimplantation mouse and bovine embryos and their cryobiological implications. Cell Biophys. 1986;8:259-285.
29. Agca Y, Gilmore J, Byers M, et al. Osmotic characteristics of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extenders and sugars. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1493-1501.
30. Guthrie HD, Liu J, Critser JK. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on motility of bovine spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1811-1816.
31. Gao DY, Liu J, Liu C, et al. Prevention of osmotic injury to human spermatozoa during addition and removal of glycerol. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1109-1122.
32. Woods EJ, Liu J, Pollok K, et al. A theoretically optimized method for cord blood stem cell cryopreservation. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2003;12:341-350.
33. Bavister BD, Leibfried ML, Lieberman G. Development of preimplantation embryos of the golden hamster in a defined culture medium. Biol Reprod. 1983;28:235-247.
34. Parrish JJ, Susko-Parrish JL, Leibfried-Rutledge ML, et al. Bovine in vitro fertilization with frozen thawed semen. Theriogenology. 1986;25:591-600.
35. Simerly C, Schatten G. Techniques for localization of specific molecules in oocytes and embryos. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:516-553.
36. Zolman JF. Biostatistics: Experimental Design and Statistical Inference. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:368.
37. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
38. Kedem O, Katchalsky A. Thermodynamic analysis of the permeability of biological membranes to nonelectrolytes. Biochem Biophys Acta. 1958;27:229-246.
39. Newton H, Pegg DE, Barrass R, et al. Osmotically inactive volume, hydraulic conductivity, and permeability to dimethyl sulphoxide of human mature oocytes. J Reprod Fertil. 1999;117:27-33.
40. 2SO in relationship to cryobiology. Mol Reprod Dev. 1999;53:59-67.
41. Ruffing NA, Steponkus PL, Pitt RE, et al. Osmometric behavior, hydraulic conductivity, and incidence of intracellular ice formation in bovine oocytes at different developmental stages. Cryobiology. 1993;30:562-580.
42. Vajta G, Holm P, Kuwayama M, et al. Open Pulled Straw (OPS) vitrification: a new way to reduce cryoinjuries of bovine ova and embryos. Mol Reprod Dev. 1998;51:53-58.
43. Fuku EJ, Liu J, Downey BR. In vitro viability and ultrastructural changes in bovine oocytes treated with a vitrification solution. Mol Reprod Dev. 1995;40:177-185.
44. Agca Y, Liu J, Rutledge JJ, et al. Effect of osmotic stress on the developmental competence of germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage bovine cumulus oocyte complexes and its relevance to cryopreservation. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;55:212-219.
45. Kornblatt JA, Kornblatt MJ. The effects of osmotic and hydrostatic pressures on macromolecular systems. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002;1595:30-47.
46. Olmsted JB, Borisy GG. Characterization of microtubule assembly in porcine brain extracts by viscometry. Biochemistry. 1973;12:4282-4289.
47. Sackett DL, Bhattacharyya B, Wolff J. Local unfolding and the stepwise loss of the functional properties of tubulin. Biochemistry. 1994;33:12868-12878.
48. Wittmann T, Wilm M, Karsenti E, et al. TPX2, a novel xenopus MAP involved in spindle pole organization. J Cell Biol. 2000;149:1405-1418.
49. Merdes A, Ramyar K, Vechio JD, et al. A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly. Cell. 1996;87:447-458.
50. do Carmo Avides M, Glover DM. Abnormal spindle protein, Asp, and the integrity of mitotic centrosomal microtubule organizing centers. Science. 1999;283:1733-1735.
51. Barbosa V, Yamamoto RR, Henderson DS, et al. Mutation of a Drosophila gamma tubulin ring complex subunit encoded by discs degenerate-4 differentially disrupts centrosomal protein localization. Genes Dev. 2000;14:3126-3139.
52. Nasmyth K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu Rev Genet. 2001;35:673-745.
53. Rho GJ, Kim S, Yoo JG, et al. Microtubulin configuration and mitochondrial distribution after ultra-rapid cooling of bovine oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2002;63:464-470.
54. Martino A, Songsasen N, Leibo SP. Development into blastocysts of bovine oocytes cryopreserved by ultra-rapid cooling. Biol Reprod. 1996;54:1059-1069.