On Modeling Choice and Frequency of Home-Based Telecommuting

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1858, 2003, Pages 55-60

  Popuri, Yasasvi D ^a   Bhat, Chandra R ^b  

^a Cambridge Systematics Inc ^*  (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; GAS EMISSIONS; PLANNING; PUBLIC POLICY; TRAFFIC SURVEYS; TRANSPORTATION;

GROWTH RATE; OCCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIOLOGY;

TELECOMMUTING;

EID: 2142656454     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Bagley, M. N., and P. L. Mokhtarian. Analyzing the Preference for Non-Exclusive Forms of Telecommuting: Modeling and Policy Implications. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 203-226.
2. Jala International, Inc. Telecommuting Forecast for the United States of America. 2000. www.jala.com/ustcforecast.htm.
3. Mokhtarian, P. L. A Typology of Relationships Between Telecommunications and Transportation. Transportation Research A, Vol. 24, No. 3, 1990, pp. 231-242.
4. Mokhtarian, P. L. Telecommunications and Travel. Transportation in the New Millennium. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. www4.nationalacademies.org/trb/homepage.nsf/web/millennium_papers.
5. Kitamura, R., K. Goulias, and R. M. Pendyala. Telecommuting and Travel Demand: An Impact Assessment for State of California Telecommute Pilot Project Participants. Research Report UCD-TRG-RR-90-8. Transportation Research Group, University of California, Davis, 1990.
6. Popuri, Y. D. On Modeling the Choice and Frequency of Home-Based Telecommuting by Individuals. M.S. thesis. University of Texas, Austin, 2001.
7. Drucker, J., and A. J. Khattak. Propensity to Work from Home: Modeling Results from the 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1706, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 108-117.
8. Mannering, J. S., and P. L. Mokhtarian. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting Frequency in California: An Exploratory Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 49, 1995, pp. 49-73.
9. Edwards, P., and S. Edwards. Working from Home - Everything You Need to Know About Living and Working Under the Same Roof. J. P. Tarcher, Los Angeles, Calif., 1985.
10. Gordon, G. E. The Dilemmas of Telework: Technology vs. Tradition. In Telework: Present Situation and Future Development of a New Form of Work Organization (W. B. Korte, W. J. Steinle, and S. Robinson, eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1988.
11. Nilles, J. M. Traffic Reductions by Telecommuting: A Status Review and Selected Bibliography. Transportation Research A, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1988, pp. 301-317.
12. Yen, J.-R., and H. S. Mahmassani. The Telecommuting Adoption Process: Conceptual Framework and Model Development. Report 60055-1. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, 1994.
13. Sullivan, M. A., H. S. Mahmassani, and J.-R. Yen. Choice Model of Employee Participation in Telecommuting Under a Cost-Neutral Scenario. In Transportation Research Record 1413, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 42-48.
14. Mokhtarian, P. L., and I. Salomon. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: Setting the Context. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 26, No. 5, 1994, pp. 749-766.
15. Mokhtarian, P. L., and I. Salomon. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: 2. A Case of the Preferred Impossible Alternative. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 28, 1996, pp. 1859-1876.
16. Mokhtarian, P. L., and I. Salomon. Modeling the Choice of Telecommuting: 3. The Importance of Attitudinal Factors in Behavioral Models. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 28, 1996, pp. 1877-1894.
17. Bernardino, A., M. Ben-Akiva, and I. Salomon. Stated Preference Approach to Modeling the Adoption of Telecommuting. In Transportation Research Record 1413, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 22-30.
18. Belanger, F. Workers' Propensity to Telecommute: An Empirical Study. Information & Management, Vol. 35, 1999, pp. 139-153.
19. Handy, S. L., and P. L. Mokhtarian. Forecasting Telecommuting: An Exploration of Methodologies and Research Needs. Transportation, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 163-190.
20. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Income Tables - Households. 2000. www.census.gov/hhes/income/histinc/inchhdet.html.
21. Population Research Institute. U.S. Census Report Reveals Benefits of Population Growth. PRI Weekly News Briefing Archives. Jan. 7, 2000. www.pop.org/briefings/censusreport.htm.
22. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. Projected Number of Families with Children Under 18 Years by Type: 1995 to 2010. 1999. www.census.gov/population/www/projections/nathh.html.
23. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce. Working at Home. 1999. www.census.gov/population/www/projections/wkhtab.html.