Searching for the "Big Five" in a Greek context: The NEO-FFI under the microscope

Personality and Individual Differences

Volumn 36, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 1841-1854

  Panayiotou, Georgia ^a   Kokkinos, Constantinos M ^b   Spanoudis, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b DEMOCRITUS UNIVERSITY OF THRACE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Assessment; Big Five; NEO FFI; Personality

Indexed keywords

EID: 2142639372     PISSN: 01918869     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ackerman P. Heggestad E. Intelligence, personality and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits Psychological Bulletin 121 1997 219-245
2. Becker P. Beyond the Big Five Personality and Individual Differences 26 1999 511-530
3. Church A. Burke P. Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three - and four-dimensional models Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66 1994 93-114
4. Costa P.T. McCrae R.R. The NEO PI-R professional manual 1992 Psychological Assessment Resources Odessa, Florida
5. Costa P.T. McCrae R.R. Reply to Eysenck Personality and Individual Differences 13 1992 667-673
6. Demetriou A. Kazi S. Unity and modularity in the mind and the self: Studies on the relationships between self-awareness, personality, and intellectual development from childhood to adolescence 2001 Routledge London
7. Demetriou A. Kyriakides L. & Avraamidou C. (in press). The missing link in the relations between intelligence and personality. Journal of Research in Personality
8. Derogatis L.R. BSI brief symptom inventory. Administration, scoring and procedures manual 1993 National Computer Systems Minneapolis
9. Derogatis L.R. Cleary P.A. Confirmation of the dimensional structure of the SCL-90-R: A study in construct validation Journal of Clinical Psychology 33 1977 981-989
10. Egan V. Deary I. Austin E. The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggests N, A, and C are more reliable than O and E Personality and Individual Differences 29 2000 907-920
11. Ferguson E. Patterson F. The five factor model of personality: Openness a distinct but related construct Personality and Individual Differences 12 1998 773-790
12. Goldberg L.R. An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59 1990 1216-1229
13. Goldberg L.R. The structure of phenotypic personality traits American Psychologist 48 1993 26-34
14. Holden R.R. Fekken G.C. The NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a Canadian context: Psychometric properties for a sample of university women Personality and Individual Differences 17 1994 441-444
15. Hu L.T. Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives Structural Equation Modeling 6 1999 1-55
16. Kurtz J.E. Sherker J.L. Relationship quality, trait similarity, and self-other agreement on personality ratings in college roommates Journal of Personality 71 2003 21-48
17. McCrae R.R. Costa P.T. Rotation to maximize the construct validity of factors in the NEO Personality Inventory Multivariate Behavioral Research 24 1989 107-124
18. McCrae R.R. Zonderman A.B. Bond M.H. Paunonen S.V. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus proctustes rotation Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 1996 552-566
19. Mooradian T.A. Nezlak J.B. Comparing the NEO-FFI and Saucier's Mini-Markers as measures of the Big Five Personality and Individual Differences 21 1996 213-215
20. Mueller R.O. Basic principles of structural equation modelling 1996 Springer Verlag New York
21. Muthén L.K. Muthén B.O. Mplus User's Guide 2001 Muthén & Muthén Los Angeles, CA
22. Parker J.D.A. Bagby R.M. Summerfeldt L.J. Confirmatory factor analysis of the revised NEO personality inventory Personality and Individual Difference 15 1993 463-466
23. Parker W.D. Stumpf H. A validation of the five-factor model of personality in academically talented youth across observers and instruments Personality and Individual Differences 25 1998 1005-1025
24. Piedmont R.L. McCrae R.R. Costa Jr. P.T. Adjective check list scales and the five factor model Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 1991 630-637
25. Pulver A. Allik J. Pulkkinen L. Hamalainen M. A Big Five personality inventory in two non-Indo-European languages European Journal of Personality 9 1995 109-124
26. Riemann R. Angleitner A. Strelau J. Genetic and environmental influences on personality: A study of twins reared together using the self- and peer-report NEO-FFI scales Journal of Personality 3 1997 449-475
27. Rolland J.P. Parker W.D. Stumpf H. A psychometric examination of the French translations of the NEO-PI-R and NEO- FFI Journal of Personality Assessment 7 1998 269-291
28. Saucier G. Orthogonal markers for orthogonal factors: The case of the Big Five Journal of Research in Personality 36 2002 1-31
29. Schmitz N. Hartkamp N. Baldini C. Rollnik J. Tress W. Psychometric properties of the German version of the NEO-FFI in psychosomatic outpatients Personality and Individual Differences 31 2001 713-722
30. Stalikas A. Triliva S. Roussi P. Ta psychometrica ergalia stin Ellada [Psychometric tools in Greece] 2002 Ellinaka Grammata Athens
31. Spirrison C.L. Choi S. Psychometric properties of a Korean version of the revised NEO-Personality Inventory Psychological Reports 83 1998 263-274
32. Tokar D.M. Fischer A.R. Snell A.F. Harik-Williams N. Efficient assessment of the five-factor model of personality: Structural validity analyses of the NEO five-factor inventory (Form S) Measurement and Evaluation in Counselling and Development 32 1999 14-30
33. Yoshimura K. Ono Y. Nakamura K. Nathan J.H. Suzuki K. Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO-five factor inventory in a large community sample Psychological Reports 88 2001 443-449