Self-injurious behavior and sequential analysis: Context matters

American Journal on Mental Retardation

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 323-326

  Symons, Frank J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NALTREXONE; OPIATE ANTAGONIST; PLACEBO;

ANALYTIC METHOD; AUTOMUTILATION; BEHAVIOR DISORDER; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; PHENOTYPE; REINFORCEMENT; REVIEW; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; CAUSALITY; CHILD; CONDITIONING, OPERANT; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MENTAL RETARDATION; META-ANALYSIS; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SELF-INJURIOUS BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS;

EID: 21344450066     PISSN: 08958017     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[323:SBASAC]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Bakeman, R., McArthur, D., & Quera, V. (1996). Detecting group differences in sequential association using sample permutations: Log odds, kappa, and phi compared. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 28, 446-457.
3. Hall, S., Thorns, T., & Oliver, C. (2003). Structural and environmental characteristics of stereotyped behaviors. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 391-402.
4. Marion, S. D., Touchette, P. E., & Sandman, C. A. (2003). Sequential analysis reveals a unique structure for self-injurious behavior. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 108, 301-313.
5. Repp, A. C., Singh, N. N., Karsh, K. G., & Deitz, D. E. D. (1991). Ecobehavioural analysis of stereotypic and adaptive behaviours: Activities as setting events. Journal of Mental Deficiency Research, 35, 413-435.
6. Symons, F. J. (2001, May). Idiosyncratic effects of instructional context on antecedents for self-injury. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, New Orleans.
7. Symons, F. J., Hoch, J., Dahl, N. A., & McComas, J. J. (2003). Sequential and matching analysis of adaptive and aberrant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 36, 267-270.
8. Symons, F. J., & MacLean, W. E., Jr. (2000). Analyzing and treating severe behavior problems in people with developmental disabilities. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 143-157). Baltimore: Brookes.
9. Symons, F. J., Tapp, J., Wulfsberg, A., Sutton, K. A., Heeth, W. L., & Bodfish, J. W. (2001). Sequential analysis of the effects of naltrexone on the environmental mediation of self-injurious behavior. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 269-276.
10. Tapp, J, Wehby, J. H., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 27, 25-31.
11. Taylor, D. V., Hetrick, W. P., Neri, C. L., Touchette, P., Barron, J. L., & Sandman, C. A. (1991). Effect of naltrexone upon self-injurious behavior, learning, and activity: A case study. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior, 40, 79-82.
12. Wampold, B. E. (1992). The intensive examination of social interaction. In T. R. Kratochwill & J. R. Levin (Eds.), Single-case research design and analysis: New directions for psychology and education (pp. 93-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Wickens, T. D. (1993). Analysis of contingency tables with between-subjects variability. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 191-204.
14. Yoder, P. J., & Feurer, I. D. (2000). Quantifying the magnitude of sequential association between events or behavior. In T. Thompson, D. Felce, & F. J. Symons (Eds.), Behavioral observation: Technology and applications in developmental disabilities (pp. 317-334). Baltimore: Brookes.
15. Yoder, P. J., & Tapp, J. (1990). SATS: Sequential analysis of transcripts system. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 22, 339-343.