Evidence informed policy making for health communication

Health Education Journal

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 120-128

  Stewart, Ruth ^a   Hargreaves, Katrina ^a   Oliver, Sandy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Consensus; Evidence; Information; Informed choice; Policy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONSULTATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NEWBORN SCREENING; PARENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 21344432620     PISSN: 00178969     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001789690506400204     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Sackett DL. Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. British Medical Journal, 1996: 312: 71-72.
2. Greenhalgh T. Outside the ivory towers: Evidence based medicine in the real world. British Journal of General Practice, 1998: 48: 1448-1449.
3. Cotton JA. Involving key stakeholders in the review process: A multi-method approach. Health Education Journal, 2002: 61(1): 87-90.
4. Hart JT. Cochrane Lecture 1997. What evidence do we need for evidence based medicine? Journal of Epidemiology 6- Community Health, 1997: 51(6): 623-629.
5. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? British Medical Journal, 1999: 319: 780-782.
6. Bekker H, Thornton JG, Airey CM, Connelly JB, Hewison J, Robinson MB. Informed decision making: An annotated bibliography and systematic review. Health Technology Assessment, 1999: Report no. vol 3 no 1.
7. Gwyn R, Elwyn G. When is a shared decision not (quite) a shared decision? Negotiating preferences in a general practice encounter. Social Science and Medicine, 1999: 49(4): 437-447.
8. Ubel PA. 'What should I do, doc?' Some psychological benefits of physician recommendations. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2002: 162: 977-980.
9. Mazur DJ. Influence of the law on risk and informed consent. British Medical Journal, 2003: 327: 731-734.
10. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. The Guideline Development Process: An Overview for Stakeholders, the Public and the NHS. London: NICE, 2004.
11. Centre for Health Information Quality. Guidelines for Producing Health Information. Winchester: CHIQ, 2004. Accessed http://www.hfht.org/chiq.
12. Murphy MK, Black NA, Lamping DL, McKee CM, Sanderson CFB, Askham J, Marteau T. Consensus Development Methods, and their Use in Clinical Guideline Development. Southampton: Health Technology Assessment vol 2 no 3, 1998.
13. Grimshaw J, Eccles M, Russell I. Developing clinically valid practice guidelines. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 1995: 1(1): 37-48.
14. Greenlagh T, Hughes J, Humphrey C, Rogers S, Swinglehurst D, Martin P. A comparative case study of two models of a clinical unformaticist service. British Medical Journal, 2002: 324: 524-529.
15. Booth-Clibborn N, Milne R, Oliver S. Searching for high quality evidence to prepare patient information. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 2001: 18(2): 75-82.
16. The Cochrane Library. Accessed http://www.update-software.com/cochrane/, 2004.
17. The Health Technology Assessment Programme (HTA). Accessed www.hta.nhsweb. nhs.uk/, 2004.
18. Stewart R, Oliver S. What is Known about Communication with Parents about Newborn Bloodspot Screening? London: UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, 2003.
19. Charnock D. The DISCERN Handbook. Quality criteria for consumer health information on treatment choices. Radcliffe Medical Press, 1998.
20. National Screening Committee. Second Report of the National Screening Committee, 2002.
21. Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S. Survey of Information Resources on Newborn Blood Spot Screening for Parents and Health Professionals. London: UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, 2004.
22. Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S. Newborn screening information supports public health more than informed choice. Health Education Journal, 2005: 64(2): 110-119.
23. Stewart R, Hargreaves K, Oliver S. Telling Parents about the Heel-prick Test: Consultation results and resource development. London: UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, 2004.
24. The Centre for Health Information Quality. Accessed http://www.hfht.org/ chiq/,2004.
25. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, Gann R. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 1998: 53: 105-111.
26. Department of Health. Toolkit for Producing Patient Information. Report no. version 2.0. London: DoH, 2003.
27. Duman M. Producing Patient Information: How to research, develop and produce effective information resources. London: Kings Fund, 2003.
28. Lack J, Rollin A, Thoms G, White L, Williamson C. Raising the Standard: Information for Patients. London: The Royal College of Anaesthetists, 2003.
29. Epstein R, Alper JK, Quill TE. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. Journal of the American Medical Association, 2004: 291(19): 2359-2366.
30. University of London. A Pilot Study of 'Informed Choice' Leaflets on Positions in Labour and Routine Ultrasound. Report no. CRD Report 7. London: Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, 1996.