Sparse regeneration in translucent wavelength-routed optical networks: Architecture, network design and wavelength routing

Photonic Network Communications

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 39-53

  Yang, Xi ^a,b   Ramamurthy, Byrav ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Bit error rate (BER); Network design; Physical impairments; Regenerator allocation; Regenerator placement; Routing and wavelength assignment (RWA); Signal quality; Sparse regeneration; Translucent optical network; Wavelength division multiplexing (WDM)

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIT ERROR RATE; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INTERNET; OPTICAL SWITCHES; ROUTERS; WAVELENGTH DIVISION MULTIPLEXING;

NETWORK DESIGN; PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENTS; REGENERATOR ALLOCATION; REGENERATOR PLACEMENT; ROUTING AND WAVELENGTH ASSIGNMENT (RWA); SIGNAL QUALITY; SPARSE REGENERATION; TRANSLUCENT OPTICAL NETWORKS;

FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS;

EID: 21244476317     PISSN: 1387974X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11107-005-1694-y     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. B. Mukherjee, Optical Communication Networks. (McGraw-Hill, New York, July 1997).
2. I. Chlamtac, A. Farago, T. Zhang, Lightpath (wavelength) routing in large WDM networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 14, no. 5, (June 1996), pp. 909-913.
3. J. Strand, A. L. Chiu, R. Tkach, Issues for routing in the optical layer, IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 39, no. 2, (Feb. 2001), pp. 89-97.
4. J. Strand, A. Chiu, Impairments and other constraints on optical layer routing, IETF Draft (Work in Progress), draft-ietf-ipo-impairments-05.txt, (May 2003).
5. C. A. Brackett, et al., A scalable multiwavelength multi-hop oplical network: A proposal for research on all-optical networks, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 11, no. 5, (May/June 1993), pp. 736-753.
6. B. Ramamurthy et al., Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 1999) Technical Digest, (Washington DC, USA, Mar. 1999), vol. 1, pp. 59-61.
7. R. E. Wagner, L. Nederlof, S. De Maesschalck, The potential of optical layer networks, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 2001) Technical Digest, (Anaheim, CA, USA, Mar. 2001), pp. TuT3-1-3.
8. R. E. Wagner, Managed reach optical networks, Proc. of LEOS Summer Topical Meetings - 2000 Digest (Aventura, FL, USA, Jul. 2000), pp. IV33-34.
9. A. Saleh, Islands of transparency - an emerging reality in multiwavelength optical networking, Proc. of IEEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meeting on Broadband Optical Networks and Technologies, (Monterey, CA, USA, Jul. 1998), p. 36.
10. T. Carpenter et al., Maximizing the transparency advantage in optical networks, Communication Conference (OFC 2003) Technical Digest, (Atlanta, GA, Mar. 2003), vol. 2, pp. 616-417.
11. X. Yang, B. Ramamurthy, Sparse regeneration in a translucent WDM optical network, Proc. of the SPIE Asia-Pacific Optical and Wireless Communications, (Beijing China, Nov. 2001), pp. 61-70.
12. B. Ramamurthy, S. Yaragorla, X. Yang, Translucent optical WDM networks for the next-generation backbone networks, Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM 2001, (San Antonio, TX, USA, Nov. 2001), vol. 1, pp. 60-64.
13. N. Barakat, A. Leon-Garcia, An analytical model for predicting the locations and frequencies of 3R regenerations in all-optical wavelength-routed WDM networks, Proc. of IEEE ICC 2002, (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2002), vol. 5, pp. 2812-2816.
14. G. Shen, et al., Sparse placement of electronic switching nodes for low-blocking in translucent optical networks, OSA Journal of Optical Networking, vol. 1, no. 12, (Dec. 2002), pp. 424-441.
15. M. Ali, L. Tancevski, Impact of polarization-mode dispersion on the design of wavelength-routed networks, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 14, no. 5, (May 2002), pp. 720-722.
16. H. Zang, R. Huang, J. Pan, Methodologies on designing a hybrid shared-mesh-protected WDM network with sparse wavelength conversion and regeneration, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 4910, (Sep. 2000), pp. 188-196.
17. X. Yang, B. Ramamurthy, Dynamic routing in translucent WDM optical networks, Proc. of IEEE ICC 2002, (New York, NY, USA, Apr. 2002), vol. 5, pp. 2796-2802.
18. D. Levandovsky, Wavelength routing based on physical impairments, Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 2001) Technical Digest, (Anaheim, CA. USA, Mar. 2001), pp, TuG7-1-3.
19. M. Ali, V. Leboucher, D. Penninckx, Intelligent lightpath selection schemes, Proc. of European Conference on Optical Communication (Copenhagen, Denmark, Sep. 2002), p. 207.
20. N. Antoniades et al., Evaluating the reach of multiwavelength optical networks, Proc. of LEOS 1998 Annual Meeting, (Orlando, FL, USA, Dec. 1998), vol. 1, pp. 284-285.
21. B. Ramamurthy, Design of Optical WDM Networks: LAN, MAN and WAN Architectures. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, USA, Dec. 2000).
22. R. Ramaswami, K. N. Sivarajan, Optical Networks: A Practical Perspective, 2nd Edition, Morgan Laufmann Publishers, 2001.
23. H. Zang, J. P. Jue, B. Mukherjee, A review of routing and wavelength assignment approaches for wavelength-routed optical WDM networks, SPIE/Kluwer Optical Network Magazine, vol. 1, no. 1, (Jan. 2000), pp. 47-60.
24. B. Ramamurthy et al., SIMON: a simulator for optical networks, Proc. of the SPIE: the Fifth Annual Conference on All-Optical Networking, (Boston, MA, USA, Sep. 1999), pp. 130-135.
25. D. Datta, et al., BER based lightpath admission in wavelength-routed optical networks. Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OFC 1998) Technical Digest. (San Jose, CA, USA, Feb. 1998), pp. 92-93.
26. B. Ramamurthy, et al., Impact of transmission impairments on the teletraffic performance of wavelength-routed optical networks, IEEE/OSA Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 17, no. 10, (oct. 1999), pp. 1713-1723.