Transparent vs. opaque vs. translucent wavelength-routed optical networks

OFC/IOOC 1999 - Optical Fiber Communication Conference and the International Conference on Integrated Optics and Optical Fiber Communication

Volumn 1, Issue , 1999, Pages 59-61

  Ramamurthy, B ^a   Feng, H ^b   Datta, D ^d   Heritage, J P ^b   Mukherjee, B ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Davis   (United States)

^d INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIT ERROR RATE; FIBER OPTIC NETWORKS; FIBERS; INTEGRATED OPTICS; OPTICAL COMMUNICATION; OPTICAL FIBERS;

CALL ADMISSION; TRANSMISSION IMPAIRMENT; WAVELENGTH ROUTED OPTICAL NETWORKS;

OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85029623739     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/OFC.1999.767791     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. E. Goldstein, J. Nagel, J. Strand, and R. Tkach. National-scale networks likely to be opaque. Lightwave Xtra!, Feb. 1998.
2. However, note the use of a pair of electronic switches (marked ESW in Fig. 2) in this architecture.
3. D. Datta, B. Ramamurthy, H. Feng, J. P. Heritage, and B. Mukherjee. BER-based call admission in wavelength-routed optical networks. In Optical Fiber Communication (OFC '98) Technical Digest, San Jose, CA, Feb. 1998.