Porcine endogenous retrovirus encodes xenoantigens involved in porcine cellular xenograft rejection by mice

Transplantation

Volumn 79, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1674-1682

  Simeonovic, Charmaine J ^a   Ziolkowski, Andrew F ^a   Popp, Sarah K ^a   Milburn, Peter J ^a   Lynch, Celina Ann ^a   Hamilton, Peter ^a   Harris, Karla ^a   Brown, Debra J ^a   Bain, Simon A F ^a   Wilson, J Dennis ^b   Gibbs, Adrian J ^c  

^a Biology and Environment   (Australia)

^b CANBERRA HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Porcine endogenous retrovirus; Rejection; Xenograft

Indexed keywords

LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNIZATION; KIDNEY EPITHELIUM; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PERIPHERAL LYMPHOCYTE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROVIRUS; SWINE; XENOGRAFT; XENOTRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, HETEROPHILE; ANTIGENS, VIRAL; BASE SEQUENCE; CELL LINE; DNA PRIMERS; ENDOGENOUS RETROVIRUSES; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMANS; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; MICE, SCID; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SWINE; SWINE, MINIATURE; THYROID GLAND; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS; VIRION;

EID: 21244445014     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000164316.55216.07     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Patience C, Takeuchi Y, Weiss RA. Infection of human cells by an endogenous retrovirus of pigs. Nat Med 1997; 3: 282.
2. Butler D. Last chance to stop and think on risks of xenotransplants. Nature 1998; 391: 320.
3. Sandrin MS, McKenzie IFC. Recent advances in xenotransplantation. Curr Opin Immunol 1999; 11: 527.
4. Van den Bogaerde J, White DJG. Xenogeneic transplantation. Br Med Bull 1997; 53: 904.
5. McKenzie IFC, Koulmanda M, Mandel TE, et al. Pig islet xenografts are susceptible to anti-pig but no Gal alpha(1,3) Gal antibody plus complement in Galo/o mice. J Immunol 1998; 161: 5116.
6. Dor FJ, Cheng J, Alt A, et al. Galalpha(1,3)Gal expression on porcine pancreatic islets, testis, spleen, and thymus. Xenotransplantation 2004; 11: 101.
7. Simeonovic CJ, Wilson JD, Ceredig R. Antibody-induced rejection of functioning pig proislet xenografts in CD4 T cell-depleted diabetic mice. Transplantation 1990; 50: 657.
8. Wilson JD, Simeonovic CJ, Ting JHL, et al. Role of CD4+ T-lymphocytes in rejection by mice of fetal pig proislet xenografts. Diabetes 1989; 38(suppl 1): 217.
9. Benda B, Sanberg JO, Holstad M, et al. T cells in islet-like cell cluster xenograft rejection: A study in the pig-to-mouse model. Transplantation 1998; 66: 435.
10. Simeonovic CJ, Ceredig R, Wilson JD. Effect of GK1.5 monoclonal antibody dosage on survival of pig proislet xenografts in CD4+ T cell-depleted mice. Transplantation 1990; 49: 849.
11. Olack BJ, Manna P, Jaramillo A, et al. Indirect recognition of porcine swine leukocyte Ag class I molecules expressed on islets by human CD4+ T lymphocytes. J Immunol 2000; 165: 1294.
12. Kirkman RL, Colvin RB, Flye MW, et al. Transplantation in miniature swine: VI. Factors influencing survival of renal allografts. Transplantation 1979; 28: 18.
13. Ivanoska D, Sun DC, Lunney JK. Production of monoclonal antibodies reactive with polymorphic and monomorphic determinants of SLA class I gene products. Immunogenetics 1991; 33: 220.
14. Lunney JK, Sun DC, Ivanoska D, et al. SLA monoclonal antibodies. In: Warner CM, Rothschild MF, Lamont SJ, eds. The molecular biology of the major histocompatibility complex of domestic animal species. Ames, IA, Iowa State University Press 1988, p 97.
15. Armstrong JA, Porterfield JS, de Madrid AT. C-type virus particles in pig kidney cell lines. J Gen Virol 1971; 10: 195.
16. Wilson CA, Wong S, Van Brocklin M, et al. Extended analysis of the in vitro tropism of porcine endogenous retrovirus. J Virol 2000; 74: 49.
17. Miller AD, Garcia JV, Von Suhr N, et al. Construction and properties of retrovirus packaging cells based on gibbon ape leukemia virus. J Virol 1991; 65: 2220.
18. Simeonovic CJ, Cordery DV, Van Leeuwen B, et al. Host systemic and local nitric oxide levels do not correlate with rejection of pig proislet xenografts in mice. Xenotransplantation 2002; 9: 169.
19. Specke V, Rubant S, Denner J. Productive infection of human primary cells and cell lines with porcine endogenous retroviruses. Virology 2001; 285: 177.
20. Simeonovic CJ, Zarb JC, Gazda LS, et al. Pancreatic islet and proislet transplantation in the mouse model. In: Timmermann W, Ulrichs K, Thiede DA, eds. Microsurgical models in rats and mice for transplantation research. Berlin, Springer-Verlag 1998, p 167.
21. Solomon MF, Kuziel WA, Mann D, et al. The role of chemokines and their receptors in the rejection of pig islet tissue xenografts. Xenotransplantation 2003; 10: 164.
22. Fischer N, Krach U, Niebert M, et al. Detection of porcine endogenous retrovirus (PERV) using highly specific antisera against Gag and Env. Virology 2003; 311: 222.
23. Cepko CL. Retrovirus-mediated immortalization of neural cells. Annu Rev Neurosci 1989; 12: 47.
24. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248.
25. Morris CF, Simeonovic CJ, Fung M-C, et al. Intragraft expression of cytokine transcripts during pig proislet xenograft rejection and tolerance in mice. J Immunol 1995; 154: 2470.
26. Martens GW, Lunney JK, Baker JE, et al. Rapid assignment of swine leukocyte antigen haplotypes in pedigreed herds using a polymerase chain reaction-based assay. Immunogenetics 2003; 55: 395.
27. Le Tissier P, Stoye J, Takeuchi Y, et al. Two sets of human-tropic pig retrovirus. Nature 1997; 389: 681.
28. Wilson CA, Wong S, Muller J, et al. Type C retrovirus released from porcine primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells infects human cells. J Virol 1998; 72: 3082.
29. Gunzburg WH, Salmons B. Xenotransplantation: Is the risk of viral infection as great as we thought? Mol Med Today 2000; 6: 199.
30. Triponez F, Oberholzer J, Morel P, et al. Xenogeneic islet re-transplantation in mice triggers an accelerated, species-specific rejection. Immunology 2000; 10: 548.
31. Moses RD, Pierson RNI, Winn HJ, et al. Xenogeneic proliferation and lymphokine production are dependent on CD4+ T helper cells and self-antigen presenting cells in the mouse. J Exp Med 1990; 172: 567.
32. Ramachandran S, Jaramillo A, Xu X-C, et al. Human immune responses to porcine endogenous retrovirus-derived peptides presented naturally in the context of porcine and human major histocompatibility complex class I molecules: Implications in xenotransplantation of porcine organs. Transplantation 2004; 77: 1580.
33. Wettstein PJ, Colombo MP, Jaenisch R. Non-H-2 histocompatibility antigens encoded by Moloney-murine leukemia virus in MOV mouse strains are detectable by skin grafting and cytolytic T lymphocytes. J Immunol 1988; 140: 4337.
34. Kelloff GJ, Peters RL, Donahoe RM, et al. An approach to C-type virus immunoprevention of spontaneously occurring tumors in laboratory mice. Cancer Res 1976; 36: 622.
35. Simpson E. Non-H-2 histocompatibility antigens: Can they be retroviral products? Immunol Today 1987; 8: 176.
36. Yi S, Hawthorne WJ, Lehnert AM, et al. T cell-activated macrophages are capable of both recognition and rejection of pancreatic islet xenografts. J Immunol 2003; 170: 2750.
37. Barton GM, Medzhiov R. Toll-like receptors and their ligands. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2002; 270: 81.
38. Heneine W, Tibell A, Switzer WM, et al. No evidence of infection with porcine endogenous retrovirus in recipients of porcine islet-cell xenografts. Lancet 1998; 352: 695.
39. Paradis K, Langford G, Long Z, et al. Search for cross-species transmission of porcine endogenous retrovirus in patients treated with living pig tissue. Science 1999; 285: 1236.