Using a diary to quantify learning activities

Medical Education

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 657-664

  Wilkinson, Tim J ^a,c   Wells, J Elisabeth ^a   Bushnell, John A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^c PRINCESS MARGARET HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Attitude of health personnel; Curriculum; Education, medical, undergraduate *methods; Educational measurement; Learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; RELIABILITY; VARIANCE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CURRICULUM; DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING; TEACHING MATERIALS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 21244443733     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02196.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Coles CR. How students learn, the process of learning. In: Jolly B, Rees L, eds. Medical Education in the Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998:63-82.
2. Snyder BL. The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Knopf 1973.
3. Wass V, van der Vleuten C, Shatzer J, Jones R. Assessment of clinical competence. Lancet 2001;357:945-9.
4. Sheldon TA, Clarke M, Woods JR. The student diary survey: a method of monitoring hospital-based medical education. Med Educ 1991;25(3):213-23.
5. Kay L, Pless T, Brearley S. Survey of surgical training in Europe. Med Educ 1996;30(3):201-7.
6. McLeod PJ, Snell L. Casemix in an internal medicine clerkship: educational value of the clinical problems seen. J Gen Intern Med 1991;6(5):455-9.
7. Schumacher DN. An analysis of student clinical activities. J Med Educ 1968;43(3):383-8.
8. Calhoun JG, Davis WK, Erlandson EE, Maxim BR. A multisite comparison of student activities in the surgery clerkship. Surgery 1982;91(6):622-7.
9. Murray E, Alderman P, Coppola W, Grol R, Bouhuijs P, van der Vleuten C. What do students actually do on an internal medicine clerkship? A log diary study. Med Educ 2001;35(12):1101-7.
10. Robinson JP. The time-diary method: structure and uses. In: Pentland WE, Harvey AS, Lawton MP, McColl MA, eds. Time Use Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999:47-89.
11. LaPalio LR. Time study of students and house staff on a university medical service. J Med Educ 1981;56(1): 61-4.
12. Hedges SM, Krantz DS, Contraria RJ, Rozanski AR. Development of a diary for use with ambulatory monitoring of mood, activities, and physiological function. J Psychopathol Behav Assess 1990;12(3):203-17.
13. Harvey AS. Guidelines for time use data collection and analysis. In: Pentland WE, Harvey AS, Lawton MP, McColl MA, eds. Time Use Research in the Social Sciences. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers 1999:19-45.
14. Verbrugge LM. Health diaries. Med Care 1980;18:73-95.
15. Shea JA, Fortna GS. Psychometric methods. In: Norman GR, van der Vleuten CPM, Newble DI, eds. International Handbook of Research in Medical Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 2002:97-126.
16. Dupont WD, Flummer WD Jr. Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program. Control Clin Trials 1990;11(2):116-28.
17. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Generalizability theory. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR, eds. Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to their Development and Use, 3rd edn. New York: Oxford University Press 2003: 153-171.
18. Wong MM, Csikszentmihalyi M. Motivation and academic achievement. The effects of personality traits and the quality of experience. J Pers 1991;59(3):539-74.
19. DeLongis A, Hemphill KJ, Lehman DR. A structured diary methodology for the study of daily events. In: Bryant FB, Edwards J, eds. Methodological Issues in Applied Social Psychology. Social Psychological Applications to Social Issues. New York: Plenum Press 1992:83-109.
20. Robinson JL, Gershuny J. Measuring Hours of Paid Work: Time-Diary Vs Estimate Questions. Bulletin of Labor Statistics. Geneva: International Labor Organization 1994:xi-xvii.
21. Verbrugge LM, Gruber-Baldine D. Baltimore Study of Activity Patterns. Ann Arbor: Institute of Gerontology, University of Michigan, 1993.
22. Hawes D, Talarzyk W, Blackwell R. Consumer satisfactions from leisure time pursuits. In: Schlinger M, ed. Advances in Consumer Research. Chicago: Association for Consumer Research, 1975:151-9.
23. Juster FT. The validity and quality of time use estimates obtained from. recall diaries. In: Juster FT, Stafford FP, eds. Time, Goods, and Well-Being. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan 1985: 63-92.