Designer support for online collaboration and knowledge construction

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 69-79

  Gao, Hong ^a   Baylor, Amy L ^a   Shen, E ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Designer support; Facilitation of online communication; Online collaboration and knowledge construction

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244432348     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Barab, S., MaKinster, J., & Scheckler, R. (2004). Designing system dualities: building online community. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bianchini, J. A. (1997). Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: student learning of science in small groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (10), 1039-1065.
3. Carroll, J. M., Neale, D. C., Isenhour, P. L., Rosson, M. B., & McCrickard, D. S. (2003). Notification and awareness: synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human-computer Studies, 58, 605-632.
4. Cho, K. L., & Jonassen, D. H. (2001). The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving. Educational Technology: Research & Development, 50 (3), 5-22.
5. Dillenbourg, P. (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: the risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In P. A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three words of CSCL: can we support CSCL?, Heerlen: Open Universiteit Netherlands 1-91.
6. Dimitracopoulou, A., & Petrou, A. (2003). Advanced collaborative distance learning systems for young students: design issues and current trends on new cognitive and meta-cognitive tools, Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.modellingspace.net/Documents/ Collaborative%20Review%20adimitr%20petrou%20special%20issu e%20Themes.pdf.
7. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Sorensen, E. K. (1999). Distributed computer supported collaborative learning through shared practice and social participation. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), December 12-15, 1999, Palo Alto, California, USA, retrieved December 10, 2004 from http://sll.stanford.edu/projects/CSCL99/papers/wednesday/ Lone_Dirckinck_136.pdf.
8. Fischer, F., Bruhn, J., Grasel, C., & Mandl, H. (2002). Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools. Learning and Instruction, 12, 213-232.
9. Ge, X., & Land, S. M. (2002). The effects of question prompts and peer interactions in scaffolding students' problem-solving process on an ill-structured task. Paper presented at the AERA conference, April 1-5, 2002, New Orleans, LA, USA, retrieved December 10, 2004 from http://edtech.connect. msu.edu/Searchaera2002/viewproposaltext.asp?propID=2215.
10. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9 (4), 437-469.
11. Jeong, A., & Joung, S. (2003). The effects of response constraints and message labels on interaction patterns and argumentation in online discussions. Retrieved December 1, 2004, from http://dev22448-01.sp01.fsu.edu/ Research/Labeling/Fall2002/AERAProposalScaffolding.pdf.
12. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Creating Technology-supported learning communities. In D. H. Jonassen, K. L. Peck & B. G. Wilson (Eds.), Learning with technology: a constructivist perspective, Merrill: Prentice Hall, 115-150.
13. Jonassen, D. H., & Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording Multiple Knowledge Representations for Learning. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: no more walls: theory change, paradigm shifts, and their influence on the use of computers for instructional purposes, II, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 165-196.
14. Jonassen, D. H., & Yueh, H.-P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. TechTrends, 43 (2), 24-32.
15. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 87-115.
16. Kittleson, J. M., & Southerland, S. A. (2004). The role of discourse in group knowledge construction: a case study of engineering students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 (3), 267-293.
17. Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., Guerrera, C., & Munsie, S. D. (2001). Constructing knowledge in the context of BioWorld. Instructional Science, 29(2), 155-186.
18. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation, New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Lin, X. (2001). Design metacognitive activities. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (2), 23-20.
20. McLean, R. S. (1999). Meta-Communication widgets for knowledge building in distance education. Paper presented at the Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL), December 12-15, 1999, Palo Alto, California, USA.
21. Moore, M. G. (1993). Transactional distance theory. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education, London: Routledge, 22-38.
22. Ostwald, J. (1996). Knowledge construction in software development: the evolving artifact approach. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Boulder, CO, USA: University of Colorado.
23. Patterson, M. E., Dansereau, D. F., & Newbern, D. (1992). Effects of communication aids and strategies on cooperative teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (4), 453-461.
24. Pea, R. D., Edeelson, D., & Gomez, L. (1994). The Co Vis collaboratory: high school science learning supported by a broadband educational network with scientific visualization, videoconferencing, and collaborative computing. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, USA, retrieved December 10, 2004 from http://www2.covis.nwu.edu/papers/CoVis_PDF/PeaAERA94.pdf.
25. Robertson, J., Good, J., & Pain, H. (1998). BetterBlether: the design and evaluation of a discussion tool for education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9, 219-236.
26. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1992). The social construction of scientific concepts or the concept map as conscription device and tool for social thinking in high school science. Science Education, 76 (5), 531-557.
27. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The concept map as a tool for the collaborative construction of knowledge: a microanalysis of high school physics students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30 (5), 503-534.
28. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Science discourse through collaborative concept mapping: new perspectives for the teacher. International Journal of Science Education, 16 (4), 437-455.
29. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3), 265-283.
30. Soller, A. L. (1999). Supporting social interaction in an intelligent collaborative learning system, retrieved December 27, 2004, from http://sra.itc.it/people/soller/documents/ijaied/2001/Soller-IJAIED.html.
31. Suthers, D. (1999). Representational support for collaborative inquiry. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on the System Sciences (HICSS-32), January 5-8, 1999, Maui, Hawaii, USA.
32. Suthers, D., Girardeau, L. E., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2002). The roles of representations in online collaborations. Paper presented at the AERA conference, April 1-5, 2002, New Orleans, LA, USA.
33. Suthers, D., & Hundhausen, C. D. (2001). Learning by constructing collaborative representations: an empirical comparison of three alternatives. Paper presented at the Computer-supported Collaborative Learning, March 22-24, 2001, Maastrict, the Netherlands.
34. Suthers, D., & Xu, J. (2002). Kukakuka: an online environment for artifact-centered discourse, retrieved December 25, 2004, from http://www2002.org/CDROM/alternate/252/.
35. Teasley, S. D., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Construction a joint problem space: the computer as a tool for sharing knowledge. In S. P. Lajoie & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 229-258.