Self-enforcing strategic demand reduction

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2531, Issue , 2002, Pages 289-306

  Reitsma, Paul S A ^a   Stone, Peter ^b   Csirik, János A ^c   Littman, Michael L ^d  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^c AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

^d RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE; INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

AGENT BIDDING STRATEGY; AUCTION MECHANISMS; AUCTION THEORY; AUTONOMOUS BIDDING AGENT; BIDDING STRATEGY; DEMAND REDUCTION; INTER-AGENT COMMUNICATIONS; SPECTRUM AUCTIONS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 21144456057     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36378-5_18     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Stone, P., Greenwald, A. 2002 The First International Trading Agent Competition: Autonomous Bidding Agents In Electronic Commerce Research, to appear.
2. Csirik, J. A., Littman, M. L., Singh, S., and Stone, P. 2001. FAucS: An FCC spectrum auction simulator for autonomous bidding agents. In Fiege, L.; M¨uhl, G.; and Wilhelm, U., eds., Electronic Commerce: Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, 139–151. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
3. Fehr, E., and Gachter, S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140.
4. Gimenez-Funes, E.; Godo, L.; Rodriguez-Aguiolar, J. A.; and Garcia-Calves, P. 1998. Designing bidding strategies for trading agents in electronic auctions. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, 136–143.
5. Klemperer, P. 1999. Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys 13(3):227–86.
6. Littman, M. L., and Stone, P. 2001. Implicit negotiation in repeated games. In Proceedings of The Eighth InternationalWorkshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL- 2001).
7. Rodriguez-Aguilar, J. A.; Martin, F. J.; Noriega, P.; Garcia, P.; and Sierra, C. 2001. Towards a test-bed for trading agents in electronic auction markets. AI Communications. In press. Available at http://sinera.iiia.csic.es/˜pablo/pncve.html.
8. Roth, A. E., and Ockenfels, A. 2001. Last-minute bidding and the rules for ending secondprice auctions: Evidence from eBay andAmazon auctions on the internet. To appear.Available at http://www.economics.harvard.edu/˜aroth/alroth.html.
9. Sandholm, T. 2001. Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Artificial Intelligence. To appear. available at http://www.cs.cmu.edu/˜sandholm/.
10. Weber, R. J. 1997. Making more from less: Strategic demand reduction in the FCC spectrum auctions. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 6(3):529–548.
11. Wellman, M. P. Wurman, P. R. O’Malley, K. Bangera, R. Lin, S.-D. Reeves, D. and Walsh, W. E. 2001. A trading agent competition. IEEE Internet Computing 5(2):43–51.