A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to the trial process in domestic violence felony trials

Violence Against Women

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 410-437

  Hartley, Carolyn Copps ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Domestic violence prosecution; Therapeutic jurisprudence; Violence against women

Indexed keywords

EID: 21144448849     PISSN: 10778012     EISSN: 15528448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077801202250954     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Busch, N. B., & Valentine, D. (2000). Empowerment practice: A focus on battered women. Affilia, 15, 82-95.
2. Cahn, N. R., & Lerman, L. G. (1991). Prosecuting woman abuse. In M. Steinman (Ed.), Woman battering: Policy responses (pp. 95-112). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
3. Caplow, S. (1998). What if there is no client? Prosecutors as "counselors" of crime victims. Clinical Law Review, 5, 1-45.
4. Colb, S. F. (2001). "Whodunit" versus "what was done": When to admit character evidence in criminal trials. North Carolina Law Review, 79, 939-992.
5. Dodge, M., & Greene, E. (1991). Juror and expert conceptions of battered women. Violence and Victims, 6, 271-282.
6. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Lapointe, N. (1992). Toward clarification of the meaning and key element of empowerment. Family Science Review, 5, 111-130.
7. Gibbs, M., Sigal, J., Friedman, C. R., & Orosy-Fildes, C. (1995). Factors affecting credibility in a simulated sexual harassment hearing. Violence Against Women, 1, 366-379.
8. Gutierrez, L. M., & Lewis, E. A. (1999). Empowering women of color. New York: Columbia University Press.
9. Hartley, C. C. (2001). "He said, she said": The defense attack of credibility in domestic violence felony trials. Violence Against Women, 7, 510-544.
10. Hartley, C. C., & Ryan, R. (1998). Prosecution strategies in domestic violence: Anticipating and meeting defense claims (Final report submitted to the National Institute of Justice, Grant No. 95-WT-NX-0003). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
11. Healey, K., Smith, C., & O'Sullivan, C. (1998). Batterer intervention: Program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice.
12. Herman, J. L. (1992). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.
13. Kirkwood, C. (1993). Leaving abusive partners. London: Sage.
14. Konradi, A. (1996). Understanding rape survivors' preparations for court: Accounting for the influence of legal knowledge, cultural stereotypes, personal efficacy, and prosecutor contact. Violence Against Women, 2, 25-62.
15. LaFave, W. R., & Israel, J. H. (1992). Criminal procedure (2nd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
16. Madigan, L., & Gamble, N. C. (1991). The second rape: Society's continued betrayal of the victim. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
17. McGuire, J. (2000). Can criminal law ever be therapeutic? Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 18, 413-426.
18. McGuire, L. A. (1998). Prosecution of domestic violence in Iowa: A prosecution manual (3rd ed.). Des Moines, IA: Iowa Prosecuting Attorneys Training Coordinator.
19. Mills, L. G. (1996a). Empowering battered women transnationally: The case for postmodern interventions. Social Work, 41, 261-268.
20. Mills, L. G. (1996b). On the other side of silence: Affective lawyering for intimate abuse. Cornell Law Review, 81, 1225-1263.
21. Mills, L. G. (1999). Killing her softly: Intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Review, 113, 550-613.
22. Ogden, D.R.H. (1999). Prosecuting domestic violence crimes: Effectively using Rule 404(b) to hold batterers accountable for repeated abuse. Gonzaga Law Review, 34, 361-383.
23. Pagelow, M. D. (1984). Family violence. New York: Praeger.
24. Parsons, R. J. (2001). Specific practice strategies for empowerment-based practice with women: A study of two groups. Affilia, 16, 159-179.
25. Patry, M. W., Wexler, D. B., Stolle, D. P., & Tompkins, A. J. (2000). Better legal counseling through empirical research. In D. P. Stolle, D. B. Wexler, & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 69-79). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
26. Peled, E., Eisikovits, A., Enosh, G., & Winstok, Z. (2000). Choice and empowerment for battered women who stay: Toward a constructivist model. Social Work, 45, 9-25.
27. Petrucci, C. J., Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An invitation to social scientists. In D. Carson (Ed.), The handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2nd ed.) (pp. 579-601). London: John Wiley.
28. Reutlinger, M. (1996). Evidence: Essential terms and concepts. New York: Aspen Law & Business.
29. Rosenbaum, M. A. (1994). The prosecution of domestic violence: An overview. Florida Bar Journal, 68, 52-55.
30. Scheppele, K. L. (1992). Just the facts, ma'am: Sexualized violence, evidentiary habits, and the revision of truth. New York Law School Review, 37, 123-172.
31. Simon, L. M. J. (1996). The legal processing of domestic violence cases. In B. D. Sales, & D. W. Shuman (Eds.), Law, mental health, and mental disorder (pp. 440-463). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
32. Spohn, C., & Horney, J. (1991). "The law's the law, but fair is fair:" Rape shield laws and officials' assessments of sexual history. Criminology, 29, 137-161.
33. Sprang, K. A. (2000). Holistic jurisprudence: Law shaped by people of faith. St. John's Law Review, 74, 753-781.
34. Stalans, L. J., & Lurigio, A. J. (1995). Responding to domestic violence against women. Crime & Delinquency, 41, 387-398.
35. Stolle, D. P., Wexler, D. B., Winick, B. J., & Dauer, E. A. (1997). Integrating preventive law and therapeutic jurisprudence: A law and psychology based approach to lawyering. Califonia Western Law Review, 34, 15-51.
36. Tsai, B. (2000). The trend towards specialized domestic violence courts: Improvements on an effective innovation. Fordham Law Review, 68, 1285-1327.
37. Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York: Harper & Row.
38. Wexler, D. B. (1993). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the criminal courts. William & Mary Law Review, 35, 279-299.
39. Wexler, D. B. (1994). An orientation to therapeutic jurisprudence. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 20, 259-264.
40. Wexler, D. B. (1996). Therapeutic jurisprudence in clinical practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 153, 453-455.
41. Wexler, D. B. (2000). Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Psycholegal soft spots and strategies. In D. P. Stolle, D. B. Wexler, & B. J. Winick (Eds.), Practicing therapeutic jurisprudence: Law as a helping profession (pp. 45-67). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
42. Wexler, D. B. (2002). Therapeutic jurisprudence and legal education: Where do we go from here? Revista Juridica Universidad de Puerto Rico, 71, 177-189.
43. Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1991). Essays in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
44. Winick, B. J. (1997). The jurisprudence of therapeutic jurisprudence. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 3, 184-206.
45. Winick, B. J. (2000). Applying the law therapeutically in domestic violence cases. UMKC Law Review, 69, 33-91.
46. Wittner, J. (1998). Reconceptualizing agency in domestic violence court. In N. A. Naples (Ed.), Community activism and feminist politics (pp. 81-104). New York: Routledge. [blank_line]