Short-term effects of experimental boreal forest logging disturbance on bumble bees, bumble bee-pollinated flowers and the bee-flower match

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 14, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1895-1907

  Cartar, Ralph V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Arthropods; Boreal forest; Bumble bees; Forestry; Ideal free distribution; Logging impacts; Selective logging; Undermatching

Indexed keywords

BEE; BOREAL FOREST; FLOWER VISITING; LOGGING (TIMBER); PHYSICAL DISTURBANCE; POLLINATION;

ALBERTA; CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

APIDAE; APOIDEA; ARTHROPODA; BOMBUS (GENUS); BOMBUS (SUBGENUS); BOMBUS PENNSYLVANICUS;

EID: 21144440756     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-2120-y     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. J. Banaszak 1980 Studies on methods of censusing the numbers of bees (HymenopteraApoidea) Polish Ecological Studies 6 355 366
2. O. Barbosa P.A. Marquet 2002 Effects of forest fragmentation on the beetle assemblage at the relict forest of Fray JorgeChile Oecologia 32 296 306
3. J. Dauber M. Hirsch D. Simmering R. Waldhardt A. Otte V. Wolters 2003 Landscape structure as an indicator of biodiversity: matrix effects on species richness AgricultureEcosystems and Environment 98 321 329
4. S.D. Fretwell L.J. Lucas 1970 On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds Acta Biotheoretica 19 16 36
5. S.J. Grove 2002 Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 33 1 23
6. L.D. Harder 1985 Morphology as a predictor of flower choice by bumble bees Ecology 66 198 210
7. B. Heinrich 1978 Bumblebee Economics Harvard University Press CambridgeMassachusetts
8. M. Hirsch S. Pfaff V. Wolters 2003 The influence of matrix type on flower visitors of Centaurea jacea L AgricultureEcosystems and Environment 98 331 337
9. D.W. Inouye 1980 The effect of proboscis and corolla tube lengths on patterns and rates of flower visitation by bumble bees Oecologia 45 197 201
10. JMP 2002 JMP Statistical Discovery Software SAS Institute Cary, North Carolina
11. M. Koivula 2002 Alternative harvesting methods and boreal carabid beetles (ColeopteraCarabidae) Forest Ecology and Management. 67 103 21
12. D. Kreyer A. Oed K. Walther-Hellwig R. Frankl 2004 Are forests potential landscape barriers for foraging bumble bees? Landscape scale experiments with Bombus terrestris agg. and Bombus pascuorum (HymenopteraApidae) Biological Conservation 116 111 118
13. C.M. Lessells 1995 Putting resource dynamics into continuous input ideal free distribution models Animal Behaviour 49 487 494
14. J. Niemelelä 1997 Invertebrates and forest management Conserv. Biol. 11 601 610
15. J.L. Osborne S.J. Clark R.J. Morris I.H. Williams J.R. Riley A.D. Smith et al. 1999 A landscape-scale study of bumble bee foraging range and constancy, using harmonic radar Journal of Applied Ecology 36 519 533
16. T.H. Ricketts 2001 The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes American Naturalist 158 87 99
17. A. Siira-Pietkainen J. Haimi J. Siitonen 2003 Short-term responses of soil macroarthropod community to clear felling and alternative forest regeneration methods Forest Ecology and Management 172 339 353
18. R.R. Schneider 2002 Alternative Futures: Alberta's Boreal Forest at the Crossroads Alberta Centre for Boreal Research Edmonton, AlbertaCanada
19. I. Teräs 1983 Estimation of bumblebee densities (Bombus: HymenopteraApidae) Acta Entomologica Fennica 42 103 113
20. T. Tregenza 1995 Building on the ideal free distribution Advances in Ecological Research 26 253 307