Petrogenesis of Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, southern India

Journal of Petrology

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2005, Pages

  Kumar, Anil ^a   Gopalan, K ^a   Chalapathi Rao, N V ^b,c   Gibson, Sally A ^b   Pyle, D M ^b   Dickin, A P ^d   Day, J ^b  

^a NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c Indian Bureau of Mines   (India)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KIMBERLITE; LAMPROITE; PROTEROZOIC;

EID: 20844461700     PISSN: 00223530     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egi040     Document Type: Note

References (30)

1. Anil Kumar, Padmakumari, V. M., Dayal, A. M., Murthy, D. S. N. & Gopalan, K. (1993). Rb-Sr ages of Proterozoic kimberlites of India: evidence for contemporaneous emplacement. Precambrian Research 62, 227-232.
2. Anil Kumar, Gopalan, K., Rao, K. R. P. & Nayak, S. S. (2001). Rb-Sr ages of kimberlites and lamproites from Eastern Dharwar Craton, South India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 58, 135-142.
3. Brown, R. W., Allsopp, L. H., Bristow, J. W. & Smith, C. B. (1989). Improved precision of Rb-Sr dating of kimberlitic micas: an assessment of a leaching technique. Chemical Geology (Isotope Geosciences Section) 79, 125-136.
4. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Miller, J. A., Pyle, D. M. & Madhavan, V. (1996). New Proterozoic K-Ar ages for some kimberlites and lamproites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, south India: evidence for non-contemporaneous emplacement. Precambrian Research 79, 363-369.
5. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (1998a). Constrasting isotopic mantle sources for Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and eastern Dharwar Craton: implication for Proterozoic mantle heterogeneity beneath southern India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 52, 683-694.
6. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (1998b). Reply to 'Discussion on constrasting isotopic mantle sources for Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and eastern Dharwar Craton: implication for Proterozoic mantle heterogeneity beneath southern India' by Gopalan & Anil Kumar. Journal of the Geological Society of India 53. 373-378.
7. 39Ar age determinations of the Kotakonda kimberlite and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton. Journal of the Geological Soczey of India 53, 425-433.
8. 39Ar dating of Kotakonda kimberlites and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton' by Gopalan et al. Journal of the Geological Sociey of India 54, 207-209.
9. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (2004). Petrogenesis of Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India. Journal of Petrology 45, 907-948.
10. 39Ar dating of Kotakonda kimberlites and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton' by Chalapathi Rao et al. Journal of the Geological Society of India 54, 203-205.
11. Hegner, E., Roddick, J. C., Forier, S. M. & Hulbert, L. (1995). Nd, Sr, Pb, Ar and O isotopic systematics of Sturgeon Lake kimberlite, Saskatchewan, Canada: constraints on emplacement age, alteration, source composition. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology 120, 212-222.
12. Anil Kumar & Gopalan, G. (2005). Comments on: Petrogenesis of Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India. Journal of Petrology 46, 1077-1079.
13. Anil Kumar, Padmakumari, V. M., Dayal, A. M., Murthy, D. S. N. & Gopalan, K. (1993). Rb-Sr ages of Proterozoic kimberlites of India: evidence for contemporaneous emplacement. Precambrian Research 62, 227-232.
14. Anil Kumar, Gopalan, K., Rao, K. R. P. & Nayak, S. S. (2001). Rb-Sr ages of kimberlites and lamproites from Eastern Dharwar Craton, South India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 58, 135-142.
15. Beard, A. D., Downes, H., Hegner, E. & Sablukov, S. M. (2000). Geochemistry and mineralogy of kimberlites from the Arkhangelsk region, NW Russia: evidence for transitional kimberlite magma types. Lithos 51, 47-73.
16. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Miller, J. A., Pyle, D. M. & Madhavan, V. (1996). New Proterozoic K-Ar ages for some kimberlites and lamproites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, south India: evidence for non-contemporaneous emplacement. Precambrian Research 79, 363-369.
17. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (1998). Constrasting isotopic mantle sources for Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and eastern Dharwar Craton: implication for Proterozoic mantle heterogeneity beneath southern India. Journal of the Geological Society of India 52, 683-694.
18. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (1999a). Reply to discussion on 'Contrasting isotopic mantle sources for Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah basin and Eastern Dharwar Craton: implication for Proterozoic mantle heterogeneity beneath southern India' by Gopalan & Anil Kumar. Journal of the Geological Society of India 53, 375-378.
19. 39Ar dating of Kotakonda kimberlites and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton. Journal of the Geological Society of India 53, 425-433.
20. 39Ar dating of Kotakonda kimberlites and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton' by Gopalan et al. Journal of the Geological Society of India 54, 207-209.
21. Chalapathi Rao, N. V., Gibson, S. A., Pyle, D. M. & Dickin, A. P. (2004). Petrogenesis of Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah Basin and Dharwar Craton, Southern India. Journal of Petrology 45, 907-948.
22. Fraser, K. J., Hawkesworth, C. J., Erlank, A. J., Mitchell, R. H. and Scott-Smith, B. H. (1985). Sr, Nd and Ph isotope and minor element geochemistry of lamproites and kimberlites. Earth and Planetary Science letters 76, 57-70.
23. Gibson, S. A., Thompson, R. N., Leonardos, O. H., Dickin, A. P. & Mitchell, J. G. (1995). The Late Cretaceous impact of the Trindade mantle plume: evidence from large-volume, mafic, potassic magmatism in SE Brazil. Journal of Petrology 36, 189-229.
24. Gibson, S. A., Thompson, R. N., Dickin, A. P. & Leonardos, O. H. (1996). High-Ti and low-Ti mafic potassic magmas: key to plume-lithosphere interactions and continental flood-basalt genesis. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 136, 149-165.
25. Gibson, S. A., Thompson, R. N., Day, J., Humphris, S. E. & Dickin, A. P. (2005). Melt generation processes associated with the Tristan mantle plume: constraints on the origin of EM-1. Earth and Planetary Science Letters (in press).
26. Gopalan, K. & Anil Kumar (1999). Discussion on 'Contrasting isotopic mantle sources for Proterozoic lamproites and kimberlites from the Cuddapah basin and Eastern Dharwar Craton: implication for Proterozoic mantle heterogeneity beneath southern India'. Journal of the Geological Society of India 53, 373-375.
27. 39Ar dating of Kotakonda kimberlites and Chelima lamproite, India: implication to the timing of mafic dyke swarm activity in the Eastern Dharwar Craton' by Chalapathi Rao et al. Journal of the Geological Society of India 54, 203-205.
28. Mahotkin, I. L., Gibson, S. A., Thompson, R. N., Zhuravlev, D. Z. & Zherdev, P. U. (2000). Late Devonian diamondiferous kimberlite and alkaline picrite (proto-kimberlite?) magmatism in the Arkhangelsk Region, NW Russia. Journal of Petrology 41, 201-227.
29. Mitchell, R. H. (1986). Kimberlites: Mineralogy, Geochemistry, and Petrology. New York: Plenum.
30. Schmidberger, S. S. & Francis, D. (2001). Constraints on the trace element composition of the Archean mantle root beneath Somerset Island, Arctic Canada. Journal of Petrology 42, 1095-1117.