Intra-operative support via augmented reality techniques in endoscopic surgery

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 310-315

  Bockholt, Uli ^a   Bisler, Alexander ^a   Becker, Mario ^a   Müller Wittig, Wolfgang ^b   Voss, Gerrit ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER IGD   (Germany)

^b Centre for Advanced Media Technology (CAMTech)   (Singapore)

Author keywords

augmented reality; endoscopic surgery; Finite Element Method; Mass Spring Model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; ENDOSCOPY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; METHODOLOGY;

ENDOSCOPY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 20844436464     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929080309146069     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Kiihnapfel U., Cakmak HK., Maa B H. Endoscopic surgery training using virtual reality and deformable tissue simulation. Computers & Graphics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2000. 671-682. (Pubitemid 32030182)
2. Ayache N, Cotin S, Delingette H. Surgery simulation with visual and haptic feedback. In: Shirai Y, Hirose S, editors: Robotics Research, the Eighth International Symposium. Berlin: Springer, 1998. p 311-316.
3. Argotti Y, Outters V, Davis L, Sun A, Rolland JP. Technologies for augmented reality: Real-time super-imposion of synthetic objects on dynamic rigid and simple-deformable real objects. Technical Report TR01-004. University of Central Florida, 2001.
4. Hayashibe M, Suzuki N, Nakamura Y, Hattori A, Suzuki S. Intraoperative 3D shape recovery of abdominal organs for laparoscopic data fusion. In: Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D, editors: Proceedings of Medicine Meets Virtual Reality (MMVR), Newport Beach, CA, 2002. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2002. p 188-194
5. rd International Conference on 3D Digital Imaging and Modeling, Quebec City, Canada. IEEE CS Press, 2001.
6. Younes L. Deformations, warping and object comparison: a tutorial. Tutorial at the 6th European Conference on Computer Vision, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland, June 26-July 1, 2000.
7. Tsap LV, Golfgof DB, Sarkar S. Fusion of physically-based registration and deformation modelling for nonrigid motion analysis. IEEE Trans Image Processing 2002;10(11):1659-1669.
8. Nikou C, Di Gioia A, Blackwell M, Jaramaz B, Ka-nade T. Augmented reality imaging technology for orthopaedic surgery. In: Proceedings of CAOS-USA 2000, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2000. p 277-281.
9. Grimson E, Leventon M, Ettinger G, Chabrerie A, Ozlen F, Nakajima S, Atsumi H, Kikinis R, Black P. Clinical experience with a high precison image-guided neurosurgery system. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, editors: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '98), Cambridge, MA, October 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496. Berlin: Springer, 1998. p 61-73.
10. Fuchs H, Livingston MA, Raskar R, Colucci D, Keller K, State A, Crawford JR, Rademacher P, Drake SH, Meyer AA. Augmented reality visualization for laparoscopic surgery. In: Wells WM, Colchester A, Delp S, editors: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI '98), Cambridge, MA, October 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1496. Berlin: Springer, 1998. p 934-943. (Pubitemid 128152743)
11. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intel 1992:14(2):239-256.
12. Grzeszczuk R, Henn C, Yagel R. Advanced geometric techniques for ray casting volumes. ACM SIG-GRAPH Course 4, 1998.