Differentiating malignant from benign common bile duct stricture with multiphasic helical CT

Radiology

Volumn 236, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 178-183

  Choi, Seung Hong ^a   Han, Joon Koo ^a   Lee, Jeong Min ^a   Lee, Kyoung Ho ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Lee, Jae Young ^a   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; BENIGN TUMOR; BILE DUCT CARCINOMA; BILE DUCT DISEASE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MULTIPHASIC HELICAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; PORTAL VEIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; THICKNESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASES; COMMON BILE DUCT NEOPLASMS; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOMOGRAPHY, SPIRAL COMPUTED;

EID: 20744457721     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2361040792     Document Type: Review

References (15)

1. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim AY, et al. Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. RadioGraphics 2002; 22:173-187.
2. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an evaluation of subtypes with CT and angiography. Acta Radiol 1992; 33:351-355.
3. Choi BI, Lee JH, Han MC, Kim SH, Yi JG, Kim CW. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology 1989; 172:689-692.
4. Robledo R, Muro A, Prieto ML. Extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma: US characteristics and accuracy in demonstration of tumors. Radiology 1996; 198:869-873.
5. Lee WJ, Lim HK, Jang KM, et al. Radiologic spectrum of cholangiocarcinoma: emphasis on unusual manifestations and differential diagnoses. RadioGraphics 2001; 21(Spec Issue):S97-S116.
6. Soto JA, Alvarez O, Lopera JE, Munera F, Restrepo JC, Correa G. Biliary obstruction: findings at MR cholangiography and cross-sectional MR imaging. RadioGraphics 2000; 20:353-366.
7. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen S, et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:870-876.
8. Bain VG, Abraham N, Jhangri GS, et al. Prospective study of biliary strictures to determine the predictors of malignancy. Can J Gastroenterol 2000; 14:397-402.
9. Baron RL. Computed tomography of the biliary tree. Radiol Clin North Am 1991; 29:1235-1250.
10. Hauck WW, Miike R. A proposal for examining and reporting stepwise regressions. Stat Med 1991; 10:711-715.
11. Yoon KH, Ha HK, Kim MH, et al. Biliary stricture caused by blunt abdominal trauma: clinical and radiologic features in five patients. Radiology 1998; 207:737-741.
12. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim TK, Kim SW, Han MC, Yeon KM. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: thin-section spiral CT findings with cholangiographic correlation. RadioGraphics 1997; 17:1475-1485.
13. Frattaroli FM, Reggio D, Guadalaxara A, Illomei G, Pappalardo G. Benign biliary strictures: a review of 21 years of experience. J Am Coll Surg 1996; 183:506-513.
14. Lindenauer SM. Surgical treatment of bile duct strictures. Surgery 1973; 73:875-888.
15. Lillemoe KD, Pitt HA, Cameron JL. Postoperative bile duct strictures. Surg Clin North Am 1990; 70:1355-1380.