Stentless vs. stented aortic valve replacement: Left ventricular mass regression

Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 112-118

  Tamin, Muhammed ^a   Bové, Thierry ^a   Van Belleghem, Yves ^a   François, Katrien ^a   Taeymans, Yves ^a   Van Nooten, Guido J ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE HYPERTROPHY; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE BIOPROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VENTRICLE PRESSURE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL RATE; SWINE;

EID: 20744451925     PISSN: 02184923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/021849230501300204     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. David TE, Feindel CM, Bos J, Sun Z, Scully HE, Rakowski H. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;108:1030-6.
2. David TE, Ropchan GC, Butany JW. Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine bioprosthesis. J Card Surg 1988;3:501-5.
3. Dellgren G, David TE, Raanani E, Bos J, Ivanov J, Rakowski H. The Toronto SPV: hemodynamic data at 1 and 5 years postimplantation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(Suppl 1):107-13.
4. Walther T, Falk V, Autschbach R, Scheidt A, Baryalei M, Schindewolf K, et al. Hemodynamic assessment of the stentless Toronto SPV bioprosthesis by echocardiography. J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:657-65.
5. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G, Krüger M, Bernhardt U, Diegeler A, et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valve: impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Ciculation 1999;100(Suppl II):6-10.
6. David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, Bos J, Armstrong S, Feindel CM. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and stented porcine valves: a case-match study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:236-41.
7. Van Nooten G, Caes F, François K, Van Belleghem Y, Taeymans Y. Stentless or stented aortic valve implants in elderly patients? Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 1999;15:31-6.
8. Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Grunkemeier GL, Miller DC, Weisel RD. Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac valvular operations. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Ad Hoc Liaison Committee for Standardizing Definitions of Prosthetic Heart Valve Morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62: 932-5.
9. Bojar RM, Rastegar H, Payne DD, Mack CA, Schwartz SL. Clinical and hemodynamic performance of the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:1141-7.
10. Bach DS, Goldman B, Verrier E, Petracek M, Wood J, Goldman S, et al. Impact of small valve size on hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression with the Toronto SPV stentless aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:236-41.
11. Mohr FW, Walther T, Baryalei M, Falk V, Autschbach R, Scheidt A, et al. The SPV Toronto bioprosthesis: one-year results in 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:171-5.
12. Westaby S, Horton M, Jin XY, Katsumata T, Ahmed O, Saito S, et al. Survival advantage of stentless aortic bioprostheses. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:785-90.
13. Jin XY, Westaby S. In vivo hemodynamic characteristics of porcine stentless aortic valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13(Suppl 1):67-74.
14. Luciani GB, Casali G, Auriemma S, Santini F, Mazzucco A. Survival after stentless and stented xenograft aortic valve replacement: a concurrent, controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:1443-9.
15. Del Rizzo DF, Abdoh A, Cartier P, Doty D, Westaby S. Factors affecting left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with stentless valves. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;11(Suppl 1):114-20.
16. Cohen G, Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, Tamariz M, Hanayama N, et al. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:767-78.
17. Lund O, Emmertsen K, Dorup I, Jensen FT, Flo C. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1437-46.