Technology insight: Randomized trials of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 261-268

  Sundt, Thoralf M ^a,b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Mayo Clinic   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary artery disease; Neurologic dysfunction; Off pump coronary artery bypass; Randomized trial

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL FEATURE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MORTALITY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 20544449214     PISSN: 17434297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio0190     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Pfister AJ et al. (1992) Coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 54: 1085-1092
2. Buffolo E et al. (1985) Direct myocardial revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 33: 26-29
3. Newman MF et al. (2001) Longitudinal assessment of neurocognitive function after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 344: 395-402
4. Ferguson TB Jr et al. (2002) A decade of change - risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990-1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Thorac Surg 73: 480-489
5. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (online 21 March 2005) [http://www.sts.org/doc/8730] (accessed 21 March 2005)
6. Lytle BW et al. (1999) Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117: 855-872
7. Desai N et al. (2004) A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med 351: 2302-2309
8. Magee MJ et al. (2002) Elimination of cardiopulmonary bypass improves early survival for multivessel coronary artery bypass patients. Ann Thorac Surg 73: 1196-1203
9. Mack MJ et al. (2004) Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127: 167-173
10. Cleveland JC Jr et al. (2001) Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity. Ann Thorac Surg 72: 1282-1289
11. Reston JT et al. (2003) Meta-analysis of short-term and mid-term outcomes following off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 1510-1515
12. Parolari A et al. (2003) Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: meta-analysis of currently available randomized trials. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 37-40
13. Smith GC and Pell JP (2003) Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 327: 1459-1461
14. Wood DE (2003) Lung volume reduction surgery: tempest in a teapot. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125: 457-459
15. Parolari A et al. (2004) Improved early outcomes after OPCAB: when will the final answer come? Circulation 109: e181
16. Cheng DC et al. (2005) Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 102: 188-203
17. Matata BM et al. (2000) Off-pump bypass graft operation significantly reduces oxidative stress and inflammation. Ann Thorac Surg 69: 785-791
18. Gerola LR et al. (2004) Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 569-573
19. Guler M et al. (2001) Different CABG methods in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 152-157
20. Diegeler A et al. (2000) Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional coronary bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 69: 1162-1166
21. Zamvar V et al. (2002) Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomised controlled trial. BMJ 325: 1268
22. Wandschneider W et al. (2000) Off-pump coronary bypass operations significantly reduce S100 release: an indicator for less cerebral damage? Ann Thorac Surg 70: 1577-1579
23. Lund C et al. (2003) Comparison of cerebral embolization during off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 765-770
24. Lee JD et al. (2003) Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 76: 18-26
25. Czerny M et al. (2001) Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 71: 165-169
26. Khan NE et al. (2004) A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 350: 21-28
27. Nathoe HM et al. (2003) A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 348: 394-402
28. van Dijk D et al. (2001) Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 104: 1761-1766
29. van Dijk D et al. (2002) Cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized trial. JAMA 287: 1405-1412
30. van Dijk D et al. (2000) The Octopus Study: rationale and design of two randomized trials on medical effectiveness, safety, and cost-effectiveness of bypass surgery on the beating heart. Control Clin Trials 21: 595-609
31. van Dijk D et al. (2004) Association between early and three month cognitive outcome after off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Heart 90: 431-434
32. Keizer AM et al. (2003) Cognitive self-assessment one year after on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 75: 835-839
33. Angelini GD et al. (2002) Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 359: 1194-1199
34. Ascione R et al. (1999) Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 2237-2242
35. Ascione R et al. (1999) Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 15: 685-690
36. Ascione R et al. (1999) On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 493-498
37. Ascione R et al. (2000) Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: a prospective, randomized study. Circulation 102: 1530-1535
38. Ascione R et al. (2000) Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 69: 1198-1204
39. Ascione R et al. (2001) Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating-heart coronary operations: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 121: 689-696
40. Ascione R et al. (2004) Beating heart against cardioplegic arrest studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): quality of life at mid-term follow-up in two randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 25: 765-770
41. Lloyd CT et al. (2000) Serum S-100 protein release and neuropsychologic outcome during coronary revascularization on the beating heart: a prospective randomized study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 119: 148-154
42. Puskas JD et al. (2003) Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting provides complete revascularization with reduced myocardial injury, transfusion requirements, and length of stay: a prospective randomized comparison of two hundred unselected patients undergoing off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 125: 797-808
43. Puskas JD et al. (2004) Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 291: 1841-1849
44. Straka Z et al. (2004) Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg 77: 789-793
45. Grichnik KP et al. (1999) Cognitive decline after major noncardiac operations: a preliminary prospective study. Ann Thorac Surg 68: 1786-1791
46. Hlatky MA et al. (1997) Cognitive function 5 years after randomization to coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 96 (Suppl): 11-15
47. Rasmussen LS et al. (2001) The assessment of postoperative cognitive function. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 45: 275-289
48. Gulielmos V et al. (2000) Interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and myocardial enzyme response after coronary artery bypass grafting - a prospective randomized comparison of the conventional and three minimally invasive surgical techniques. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 18: 594-601