Has human fertility declined over time? Why we may never know

Epidemiology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 494-499

  Sallmén, Markku ^a,b   Weinberg, Clarice R ^a   Baird, Donna Day ^a   Lindbohm, Marja Liisa ^b   Wilcox, Allen J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b FINNISH INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRACEPTION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; MALE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ABORTION, INDUCED; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; EPIDEMIOLOGIC METHODS; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; INFERTILITY; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREGNANCY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 20544447138     PISSN: 10443983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ede.0000165391.65690.e1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Carlsen E, Giwercman A, Keiding N, et al. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during past 50 years. BMJ. 1992;305:609-613.
2. Bonde JP. Environmental fertility research at the turn of the century. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25(special issue):529-536.
3. Toppari J, Larsen JC, Christiansen P, et al. Male reproductive health and environmental xenoestrogens. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;104(suppl 4):741-803.
4. Notkola I. New information on the prevalence of infertility. Uutta tietoa hedelmättömyyden yleisyydestä [in Finnish]. Suomen Lääkärilehti. 1995;50:865-870.
5. Akre O, Cnattingius S, Bergström R, et al. Human fertility does not decline: evidence from Sweden. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:1066-1069.
6. Joffe M. Time trends in biological fertility in Britain. Lancet. 2000;355: 1961-1965.
7. Jensen TK, Keiding N, Scheike T, et al. Declining human fertility? [Letter] Fertil Steril. 2000;73:421-422.
8. Akre O, Cnattingius S, Kvist U, et al. Re: Declining human fertility? [Letter] Fertil Steril. 2000;73:422-423.
9. Tietze C. Fertility after discontinuation of intrauterine and oral contraception. Int J Fertil. 1968;13:385-389.
10. Dunson DB, Colombo B, Baird DD. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Human Reprod. 2002;17: 1399-1403.
11. Baird DD, Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR. Use of time to pregnancy to study environmental exposures. Am J Epidemiol. 1986;124:470-480.
12. Wood JW. Dynamics of Human Reproduction. New York: Aldine de Gruyter; 1994;653:
13. Weinberg CR, Baird DD, Wilcox AJ. Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy. Slat Med. 1994;13:671-681.
14. Weinberg CR, Gladen BC. The beta-geometric distribution applied to comparative fecundability studies. Biometrics. 1986;42:547-560.
15. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998a;30:23-29.
16. Henshaw SK. Abortion incidence and service in the United States, 1995-1996. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998b;30:263-270.
17. Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom. Abortion Rates: by Age 1968-1999: Social Trends 31. Available at: www.statistics.gov.uk. Accessed December 12, 2002.
18. Office for National Statistics, United Kingdom. Abortion Rates: by Age: Social Trends 32. Available at: www.census2001.gov.uk. Accessed July 2, 2003.
19. STAKES: Statistical Yearbook on Social Welfare and Health Care 2002. Finland's Official Statistics: Social Security. Gummerus Kirjapaino Oy. Saarijärvi; 2002.
20. U.S. Bureau of Census, International Data Base. Available at: http://blue.census.gov. Accessed December 12, 2002.
21. Bonde JPE, Hjollund NHI, Jensen TK, et al. A follow-up study of environmental and biologic determinants of fertility among 430 Danish first-pregnancy planners: design and methods. Reprod Toxicol. 1998;12: 19-27.
22. Weinberg CR, Wilcox AJ. Reproductive epidemiology. In: Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998:585-608.
23. Cox RD. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J Royal Stat Soc Ser B. 1972;34:187-220.
24. Juul S, Karmaus W, Olsen J, and The European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group. Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1250-1254.
25. Karmaus W, Juul S. Infertility and subfecundity in population-based samples from Denmark, Germany, Italy, Poland and Spain. Eur J Public Health. 1999;9:229-235.
26. Olsen J, Rachootin P. Invited commentary: monitoring fertility over time-if we do it, then let's do it right. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157: 94-97.
27. Klerman LV. The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4:155-162.
28. Tuntiseranee P, Olsen J, Chongsuvivatwong V, et al. Fecundity in Thai and European regions: results based on waiting time to pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:471-477.
29. Zhu JL, Hjollund NH, Boggild H, et al. Shift work and subfecundity: a causal link or an artefact? Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:E12.
30. Basso O, Juul S, Olsen J. Time to pregnancy as a correlate of fecundity: differential persistence in trying to become pregnant as a source of bias. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29:856-861.
31. Bonde JP, Ernst E, Kold Jensen TK, et al. Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners. Lancet. 1998;352:1172-1177.
32. Slama R, Kold-Jensen T, Scheike T, et al. How would a decline in sperm concentration over time influence the probability of pregnancy? Epidemiology. 2004;15:458-465.
33. Keiding N, Kvist K, Hartvig H, et al. Estimating time to pregnancy from current durations in a cross-sectional sample. Biostatistics. 2002;3:565-578.
34. Olsen J, Andersen PK. We should monitor human fecundity, but how? A suggestion for a new method that may also be used to identify determinants of low fecundity. Epidemiology. 1999;10:419-421.