Erratum: The use of structure-activity relationship analysis in the food contact notification program (Regulatory Toxicology Pharmacology (2005) 42 (225-235) DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.04.006);The use of structure-activity relationship analysis in the food contact notification program

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 225-235

  Bailey, Allan B ^a   Chanderbhan, Ronald ^a   Collazo Braier, Nancy ^a   Cheeseman, M A ^a   Twaroski, Michelle L ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Food and drug administration; Food contact notification; Food contact substances; MCASE; Mutagenicity; OnocoLogic; Structure alerts; Structure activity relationship; TD50; Threshold of regulation

Indexed keywords

FOOD ADDITIVE;

ARTICLE; CARCINOGENICITY; FOOD ANALYSIS; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; FOOD SAFETY; GENOTOXICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

EID: 20444476511     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.11.004     Document Type: Erratum

References (21)

1. J. Ashby, and D. Paton The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures Mutation Research 286 1993 3 74
2. J. Ashby, and R.W. Tennant Definitive relationships among chemical structure, carcinogenicity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) Mutation Research 257 1991 229 306
3. R. Benigni, and A.M. Richard Quantitative structure-based modeling applied to characterization and prediction of chemical toxicity Methods 14 1998 264 276
4. M.A. Cheeseman, and E.J. Machuga Threshold of regulation D.R. Tennant Food Chemical and Risk Analysis 1997 Chapman & Hall London
5. M.A. Cheeseman, E.J. Machuga, and A.B. Bailey A tiered approach to threshold of regulation Food and Chemical Toxicology 37 1999 387 412
6. G.M. Cramer, R.A. Ford, and R.L. Hall Estimation of toxic hazard-a decision tree approach Food and Cosmetic Toxicology 16 1978 255 276
7. J.C. Dearden, M.D. Barratt, R. Benigni, D.W. Bristol, R.D. Combes, M.T.D. Cronin, P.N. Judson, M.P. Payne, A.M. Richard, M. Tichy, A.P. Worth, and J.J. Yourick The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity. The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM workshop 24) Alternatives to laboratory animals 25 1997 223 252
8. B.A. Fetterman, B.S. Kim, B.H. Margolin, J.S. Schildcrout, M.G. Smith, S.M. Wagner, and E. Zeiger Predicting rodent carcinogenicity from mutagenic potency measured in the Ames Salmonella assay Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 29 1997 312 322
9. D.W. Gaylor, J.A. Axelrad, R.P. Brown, J.A. Cavagnaro, W.H. Cyr, K.L. Hulebak, R.J. Lorentzen, M.A. Miller, L.T. Mulligan, and B.A. Schwetz Health Risk Assessment Practices in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 26 1997 307 321
10. L.S. Gold, and E. Zeiger Handbook of Carcinogenic Potency and Genotoxicity Databases 1997 CRC Press Boca Raton, Florida
11. C.J. Kokoski, S.H. Henry, C.S. Lin, and K.B. Ekelman Methods used in safety evaluation A.L. Branen P.M. Davidson S. Salminen Food Additives 1990 Marcel Dekker New York 579 616
12. R. Kroes, A.G. Renwick, M. Cheeseman, J. Kleiner, I. Mangelsdorf, A. Piersma, B. Schilter, J. Schlatter, F. van Schothorst, J.G. Vos, and G. Wurtzen Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet Food and Chemical Toxicology 42 2003 65 83
13. R. Lorentzen FDA procedures for carcinogenic risk assessment Food Technology 38 1984 108 111
14. E.J. Matthews, and J.F. Contrera A new highly specific method for predicting the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals in rodents using enhanced MCASE QSAR-ES software Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 28 1998 242 264
15. I.C. Munro, R.A. Ford, E. Kennepohl, and J.G. Sprenger Thresholds of toxicological concern based on structure-activity relationships Drug Metabolism Reviews 28 1996 209 217
16. H.S. Rosenkranz, and G. Klopman CASE, the computer-automated structure evaluation system, as an alternative to extensive animal testing Toxicology and Industrial Health 4 1988 533 540
17. A.M. Rulis Threshold of regulation: options for handling minimal risk situations J.W. Finley S.F. Robinson D.J. Armstrong Food Safety Assessment; 200th National Meeting Of The American Chemical Society 1992 American Chemical Society Washington, DC 132 139
18. A.M. Rulis, D.G. Hattan, and V.H. Morgenroth 3rd. FDA's priority-based assessment of food additives. I. Preliminary results Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 4 1984 37 56
19. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1995. Food additives: Threshold of regulation for substances used in food-contact articles (Final Rule). Federal Register 60(136), 36581-36596
20. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1982. Policy for regulating carcinogenic chemicals in food and color additives: advance notice of proposed rulemaking. Federal Register 47(64), 14464-14470
21. Y.T. Woo, D.Y. Lai, M.F. Argus, and J.C. Arcos Development of structure-activity relationship rules for predicting carcinogenic potential of chemicals Toxicology Letters 79 1995 219 228