Predicting rodent carcinogenicity from mutagenic potency measured in the Ames Salmonella assay

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 312-322

  Fetterman, Bethel A ^a   Kim, Byung Soo ^b   Margolin, Barry H ^a   Schildcrout, Jonathan S ^a   Smith, Melissa G ^a   Wagner, S Michelle ^a   Zeiger, Errol ^c  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Carcinogenic potency; Mutagenic potency; National Toxicology Program; Salmonella; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL AGENT;

AMES TEST; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CARCINOGENICITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; MOUSE; MUTAGENICITY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; RAT; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; CARCINOGENICITY TESTS; HUMANS; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; MUTAGENS; RODENTIA; SALMONELLA TYPHIMURIUM;

EID: 0030904605     PISSN: 08936692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1997)29:3<312::AID-EM12>3.0.CO;2-H     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ames BN, Durston WE, Yamasaki E, Lee FD (1973): Carcinogens are mutagens: A simple test system combining liver homogenates for activation and bacteria for detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:2281-2285.
2. Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975): Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31:347-364.
3. Bernstein L, Kaldor J, McCann J, Pike MC (1982): An empirical approach to the statistical analysis of mutagenesis data from the Salmonella test. Mutat Res 97: 267-281.
4. Bogen, KT (1995): Improved prediction of carcinogenic potencies from mutagenic potencies for chemicals positive in rodents and the Ames test. Environ Mol Mutagen 25:37-49.
5. Gold LS, Sawyer CB, McGaw R, Buckman GM, deVeciana M, Levinson R, Hooper NK, Havender WR, Bernstein L, Peto R, Pike MC, Ames BN (1984): A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays. Environ Health Perspect 58:9-22.
6. Haseman JK, Zeiger E, Shelby MD, Margolin BH, Tennant RW (1990): Predicting rodent carcinogenicity from four in vitro genetic toxicity assays: An evaluation of 114 chemicals studied by the National Toxicology Program. J Am Stat Assoc 85:964-971.
7. Hatch FT, Knize MG, Moore DH II, Felton JS (1992): Quantitative correlation of mutagenic and carcinogenic potencies for heterocyclic amines from cooked foods and additional aromatic amines. Mutat Res 271:269-287.
8. Margolin BH, Kaplan N, Zeiger E (1981): Statistical analysis of the Ames Salmonella/microsome test. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:3779-3783.
9. Margolin BH, Kim BS, Risko KJ (1989): The Ames Salmonella/microsome mutagenicity assay: Issues of inference and validation. J Am Stat Assoc 84:651-661.
10. Margolin BH, Kim BS, Smith MG, Fetterman BA, Piegorsch WW, Zeiger E (1994): Some comments on potency measures in mutagenicity research. Environ Health Perspect 102(Suppl 1):91-94.
11. Margolin BH, Risko KJ (1988): The statistical analysis of in vivo genotoxicity data: Case studies of the rat hepatocyte UDS and mouse bone marrow micronucleus assays. In Ashby J, de Serres FJ, Shelby MD, Margolin BH, Ishidate M Jr, Becking, GC (eds): "Evaluation of Short-Term Tests for Carcinogens: Report of the International Programme on Chemical Safety's Collaborative Study on In Vivo Assays." Cambridge University Press, pp 1.31-1.42.
12. McCann J, Choi E, Yamasaki E, Ames BN (1975): Detection of carcinogens as mutagens in Salmonella microsome test: Assay of 300 chemicals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:5135-5139.
13. McCann J, Gold LS, Horn L, McGill R, Graedel TE, Kaldor J (1988): Statistical analysis of Salmonella test data and comparison to results of animal cancer tests. Mutat Res 205:183-195.
14. Meselson M, Russell K (1977): Comparisons of carcinogenic and mutagenic potency. In Hiatt HH, Watson JD, Winsten JA (eds): "Origins of Human Cancer. Book C: Human Risk Assessment." Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press, pp 1473-1481.
15. Parodi S, Taningher M, Romano P, Grilli S, Santi L (1990): Mutagenic and carcinogenic potency indices and their correlation. Teratogen Carcinogen Mutagenen 10:177-197.
16. Piegorsch WW, Hoel DG (1988): Exploring relationships between mutagenic and carcinogenic potencies. Mutat Res 196:161-175.
17. Purchase IFH, Longstaff E, Ashby J, Styles JA, Anderson D, Lefevre PA, Westwood FR (1976): Evaluation of six short term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens and recommendations for their use. Nature 264:624-627.
18. Sugimura T, Sato S, Nagao M, Yahagi T, Matsushima T, Seino Y, Takeuchi M, Kawachi T (1976): Overlapping of carcinogens and mutagens. In Magee, PN, Takayama S, Sugimura, T, Matsushima, T (eds): "Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention." Baltimore: University Park Press, pp 191-215.
19. Tennant RW, Margolin BH, Shelby MD, Zeiger E, Haseman JK, Spalding J, Caspary W, Resnick M, Stasiewicz S, Anderson B, Minor R (1987): Prediction of chemical carcinogenicity in rodents from in vitro genetic toxicity assays. Science 236:933-941.
20. Zeiger E (1987): Carcinogenicity of mutagens: Predictive capability of the Salmonella mutagenesis assay for rodent carcinogenicity. Cancer Res 47:1287-1296.
21. Zeiger E, Haseman JK, Shelby MD, Margolin BH, Tennant RW (1990): Evaluation of four in vitro genetic toxicity tests for predicting rodent carcinogenicity: Confirmation of earlier results with 41 additional chemicals. Environ Mol Mutagen 16(Suppl 18):1-14.
22. Zeiger E, Risko KJ, Margolin BH (1985): Strategies to reduce the cost of mutagenicity screening with the Salmonella assay. Environ Mutagen 7:901-911.
23. Zeiger E, Tennant RW (1986): Mutagenesis, clastogenesis, carcinogenesis: Expectations, correlations, and relations. In Ramel C, Lambert B, Magnusson J (eds): "Genetic Toxicology of Environmental Chemicals. Part B: Genetic Effects and Applied Mutagenesis." New York: Wiley, pp 75-84.