Reliability of digital versus conventional cephalometric radiology: A comparative evaluation of landmark identification error

Seminars in Orthodontics

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 98-110

  McClure, Scott R ^a   Sadowsky, P Lionel ^a   Ferreira, André ^a   Jacobson, Alex ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNIFICATION RADIOGRAPHY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MEDICAL RECORD; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 20444405361     PISSN: 10738746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. A.J. Pacini Roentgen ray anthropometry of the skull J Radiol 3 1922 230-231
2. H. Hofrath Bedeutung der Rontgenfern und Abstands Aufnahme fur die Diagnostik der Kiefereanomalien Fortschr Orthod 1 1931 231-258
3. B.H. Broadbent A new x ray technique and its application to orthodontics Angle Orthod1 1 1931 45-66
4. J.C. Quintero A. Trosien D. Hatcher S. Kapila Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: Historical perspective, current status, and future developments Angle Orthod 69 1999 491-506
5. J. Brennan An introduction to digital radiography in dentistry J Orthod 29 2002 66-69
6. R. Schulze F. Krummenauer F. Schalldach B. d'Hoedt Precision and accuracy of measurements in digital panoramic radiography Dentomaxillofac Radiol 29 2000 52-56
7. C.L. Held D.J. Ferguson M.W. Gallo Cephalometric digitization: A determination of the minimum scanner settings necessary for precise landmark identification Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 119 2001 472-481
8. D.J. Halazonetis At what resolution should I scan cephalometric radiographs? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 125 2004 118-119
9. Y.J. Chen S.K. Chen H.F. Chang K.C. Chen Comparison of landmark identification in traditional versus computer-aided digital cephalometry Angle Orthod 70 2000 387-392
10. C. Hildebolt R.A. Couture B.R. Whiting Dental photostimulable phosphor radiography Dent Clin North Am 44 2000 273-297
11. M.D. Gregston T. Kula P. Hardman A. Glaros K. Kula A comparison of conventional and digital radiographic methods and cephalometric analysis software: I. hard tissue Semin Orthod 10 2004 204-211
12. W. Geelen A. Wenzel M.K. Gatfredsen L.G. Hansson Reproducibility of cephalometric landmarks on conventional film, hardcopy and monitor displayed images obtained by the storage phosphor technique Eur J Orthod 20 1998 331-340
13. Sagner I. Storr C. Benz I. Rudzki-Janson Diagnostic image quality in comparison of conventional and digital cephalometric radiographs [abstract] Dentomaxillofac Radiol 27 1998 27
14. R.K.W. Schulze G. Burkhardt G.M. Doll Landmark identification on direct digital versus film-based cephalometric radiographs: A human skull study Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 122 2002 635-642
15. J.F. Gravely P.M. Benzies The clinical significance of tracing error in cephalometry Br J Orthod 1 1974 95-101
16. A. Richardson A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis Eur J Orthod 3 1981 15-20
17. J.K. Liu Y.T. Chen K.S. Cheng Accuracy of computerized automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118 2000 535-540
18. S. Baumrind R. Frantz The reliability of head film measurements: 1. Landmark identification Am J Orthod 60 1971 111-127
19. B. Trpkova P. Major N. Prasad B. Nebbe Cephalometric landmarks identification and reproducibility: A meta analysis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 112 1997 535-540
20. A. Richardson An investigation into the reproducibility of some points, planes, and lines used in cephalometric analysis Am J Orthod 52 1966 637-651
21. S. Baumrind R.C. Frantz The reliability of head film measurements: 2. Conventional angular and linear measures Am J Orthod 60 1971 505-517
22. A.E. Stabrum K. Danielsen Precision in cephalometric landmark identification Eur J Orthod 4 1982 185-196
23. M.A. Perillo R.W. Beideman F.S. Shofer U. Jacobson-Hunt K. Higgins-Barber L.L. Laster Effect of landmark identification on cephalometric measurements: Guidelines for cephalometric analyses Clin Orthod Res 3 2000 29-36
24. E. Ellis J. McNamara Cephalometric reference planes - Sella nasion vs. Frankfort horizontal J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 2 1988 81-87
25. R. Bjerin A comparison between the Frankfort horizontal and the Sella turcica-nasion as reference planes in cephalometric analysis Acta Odontol Scand 15 1957 1-13
26. A. Lundstrom F. Lundstrum The Frankfort horizontal as a basis for cephalometric analysis Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 5 1995 537-540