The effectiveness of systems for appealing against marking error

Oxford Review of Education

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 273-291

  Newton, Paul E ^a   Whetton, Chris ^b  

^a Qualifications and Curriculum Authority   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444398872     PISSN: 03054985     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03054980500117918     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association and National Council on Measurement in Education (1999) Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (Washington, DC, AERA).
2. Clauser, B. E. (2000) Recurrent issues and recent advances in scoring performance assessments, Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 310-324.
3. Cresswell, M. J. (1986) A review of borderline reviewing, Educational Studies, 12(2), 175-190.
4. Day, B. (1999) Would you buy a test from this man? The Times Educational Supplement, 24 September.
5. Goldberg, G. L. & Walker-Bartnick, L. (1989) Designing a review and appeal process for a large scale writing assessment program, paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, California, 27-31 March.
6. Mackay (1999) A Report by the Rt Hon The Lord Mackay of Clashfem KT into the fairness of the system of examinations for the GCSE and GCE levels by Edexcel (London, Edexcel Foundation).
7. Shorrocks-Taylor, D. (1999) National testing: past, present and future (Issues in Assessment and Testing) (Leicester, BPS Books).
8. Whetton, C. & Newton, P. E. (2002) An evaluation of on-line marking, paper presented at the 28 International Association for Educational Assessment Conference, Hong Kong SAR, China, 1-6 September.