Resisting revolution: Generalism and the new genetics

Lancet

Volumn 354, Issue 9194, 1999, Pages 1992-1993

  Kumar, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPIDEMIOLOGY; GENERAL PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL GENETICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 0033524186     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04073-8     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Olsen N.D.L. Sustaining general practice. BMJ. 312:1996;525-526.
2. Pringle M., Heath I. Primary care opportunities and threats. BMJ. 314:1997;595-599.
3. Stott, N., Boland, M., Hayden, J., et al. RCGP report from general practice 27. The nature of general practice. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1996.
4. Horton R. Evidence and primary care. Lancet. 353:1999;609-610.
5. Roland M. Defining core general practitioner services. BMJ. 313:1996;704.
6. Kendrick T., Hilton S. Broader team work in primary care. BMJ. 314:1997;672-675.
7. Fugeli P., Heath I. The nature of general practice. BMJ. 312:1996;456-457.
8. Pendleton D., Schofield T., Tate P., Havelock P. The consultation. 1992;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Neighbour R. The inner consultation: how to develop an effective and intuitive consulting style. 1992;Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
10. Mant D. Evidence and primary care: can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients? Lancet. 353:1999;743-746.
11. Lenaghan, J. Brave new NHS? The impact of the new genetics on the health service. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 1998.
12. Kinmouth A.-L., Reinhard J., Bobrow M., Pauker S. Implications for genetic services in Britain and the United States. BMJ. 316:1998;767-770.
13. Royal College of General Practitioners. Genetics in primary care: a report from the Faculty Genetics Group. Occasional paper 77, 1998.
14. Sweeney B. Genetic advances: great promise tempered with concern. J R Coll Gen Pract. 44:1997;544.
15. Royal College of Physicians Consultant census 1998, and The Royal College of General Practitioners 1999.
16. Baird P. Genetics and health care. Perspect Biol Med. 33:1990;203-213.
17. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Human genetics: the science and its consequences. London: HSMO, 1995.
18. Bunton R. Popular health, advanced liberalism and Good Housekeeping Magazine. Peterson R., Bunton R. Foucault Health and Medicine. 1997;Routledge, London.
19. Clarke A. Population screening for genetic susceptibility to disease. BMJ. 311:1995;35-38.
20. Rose S., Lewontin R.C., Kamin L.J. Not in our genes. 1990;Penguin, London.
21. Kumars, S., Gantley, M. Implementing the New Genetics: tensions between policy makers and general practitioners, a grounded theory study. BMJ (in press).