Classroom assessment tools and students’ affective stances: KFL classroom settings

Language and Education

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 173-193

  Byon, Andrew Sangpil ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective stances; Classroom assessment; Foreign language pedagogy; Heritage students; Korean as a foreign language

Indexed keywords

EID: 20344408040     PISSN: 09500782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500780508668673     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Angelo, T. A., ed. 1991. Classroom Research:Early Lessons From Success, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
2. Angelo, T. A., ed. 1998. Classroom Assessment and Research:An Update on Uses, Approaches, and Research Findings, San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
3. Angelo, T. A., and Cross, K. P., 1993. Classroom Assessment Techniques:A Handbook for College Teachers, (2nd edn), San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
4. Black, P., and William, D., 1998. Inside the black box:Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80:139–44.
5. Byon, A., 2003. The Korean speech act of refusals:Sociopragmatic analysis. Sociolinguistic Journal of Korea, 11 (1):241–70.
6. Campbell, R., and Rosenthal, J., 2000. “ Heritage Languages ”. In Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education, Edited by:Rosenthal, J., 165–84. Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
7. Carduner, J., 2002. Using classroom assessment techniques to improve foreign language composition courses. Foreign Language Annals, 35 (5):545–53.
8. Cho, Y., Lee, H. S., Schulz, C., Sohn, H-M., and Sohn, S-O., 2000. Integrated Korean:Beginning 1, Honolulu:University of Hawaii Press.
9. Cottell, P. G., Jr. 1991. “ Classroom research in accounting:Assessing for learning ”. In Classroom Research:Early Lessons From Success, Edited by:Angelo, T. A., 43–54. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
10. Cross, P., 1998. “ Classroom research:Implementing the scholarship of teaching ”. In Classroom Assessment and Research:An Update on Uses, Approaches, and Research Findings, Edited by:Angelo, T. A., 5–12. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
11. Kang, S., 2002. “ The effect of the use of Korean and English in KFL classrooms of non-heritage learners ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Ree, J., (vol. 7), 25–38. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
12. Kim, H., 2001. “ Issues of heritage learners in Korean language classes ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Ree, J., (vol. 6), 257–74. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
13. Kim, H., 2002. “ The language backgrounds, motivations, and attitudes of heritage learners in KFL classes at university of Hawaii at Manoa ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Ree, J., (vol. 7), 205–22. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
14. King, R., 1998. Korean as a heritage language vs. Korean as a foreign language in North America and the former USSR:Ambiguous priorities and insufficient resources. ACTA Koreana, 1:27–40.
15. Lee, C-B., 2000. “ Two-course curriculum system for university Korean programs ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Kang, S., (vol. 4), 181–210. Monterey, CA:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
16. Lee, D., 2001. “ Recent trends in foreign language teaching in the US:the role of heritage learners ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Ree, J., (vol. 6), 203–14. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
17. Lee, H. S., 2001. The summary of the survey results, E-mail report 1.09.01 from hyoslee@indiana.edu
18. Lee, J. S., 2002. The Korean language in America:The role of cultural identity in heritage language learning. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15 (2):117–33.
19. Shin, S., and Kim, S., 2000. “ The introduction of content-based language teaching to college-level Korean program for heritage learners ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Sohn, S., (vol. 5), 167–80. Los Angeles, CA:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
20. Sohn, H-M., 1999. The Korean language, London:Cambridge University Press.
21. Sohn, S-S., 1995. “ The design of curriculum for teaching Korean as a heritage language ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Sohn, H M., (vol. 1), 19–35. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
22. Sohn, S-S., 1997. “ Issues and concerns in teaching multi-level classes:Syllabus design for heritage and non-heritage learners ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Kim, Y., (vol. 2), 139–58. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.
23. Sohn, S-S., 2000. Writings by heritage and non-heritage learners of Korean at a college-level:A comparative error analysis. Paper presented at the Conference on the Critical Issues in Korean Studies in the Millennium, University of Hawaii. February2000.
24. Sohn, S-S., and Shin, S., 2003. Assessment and placement of Korean heritage speakers, University of California at Los Angeles. Unpublished manuscript
25. Steadman, M., 1998. “ Using classroom assessment to change both teaching and learning ”. In Classroom Assessment and Research:An Update on Uses. Approaches, and Research Findings, Edited by:Angelo, T. A., 23–35. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
26. Steadman, M., and Svinicki, M., 1998. “ CATs:A student's gateway to better learning ”. In Classroom Assessment and Research:An Update on Uses, Approaches, and Research Findings, Edited by:Angelo, T. A., 13–20. San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
27. Sternberg, R. J., 1983. Criteria for Intellectual Skills Training. Educational Researcher, 12:6–12.
28. You, C., 2001. “ Heritage vs. non-heritage issues revisited ”. In The Korean Language in America, Edited by:Ree, J., (vol. 6), 275–84. Honolulu:American Association of Teachers of Korean.