Using classroom assessment to change both teaching and learning

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 1998, Issue 75, 1998, Pages 23-35

  Steadman, Mimi ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994601054     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.7503     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Angelo, T. A. Classroom Research: Early Lessons from Success. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 46. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1991.
2. Angelo, T. A., and Cross, K. P. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers. (2nd ed.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1993.
3. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. The Condition of the Professoriate: Attitudes and Trends 1989., Princeton, N.J.: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 1989.
4. Catlin, A., and Kalina, M. What Is the Effect of the Cross/Angelo Model of Classroom Assessment on Student Outcome? A Study of the Classroom Assessment Project at Eight California Com-munity Colleges. Research project funded by the California Community College Chancel-lor’s Office, Funds for Instructional Improvement Grant 92-0016, 1993.
5. Cross, K. P., and Angelo, T. A. Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for Faculty. Ann Arbor, Mich.: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 1988.
6. Cross, K. P., and Steadman, M. H. Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1996.
7. Csikszentmihalyi, M. ‘Intrinsic Motivation and Effective Teaching: A Flow Analysis.’ In J. L. Bess (ed.) Motivating Professors to Teach Effectively. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, no. 10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1982.
8. Cuevas, G. J. ‘Feedback from Classroom Research Projects.’ Community-Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 1991, 15 (4), 381–390.
9. Frase L. E., and Piland, W. E. ‘Breaking the Silence About Faculty Rewards.’ Community College Review, 1989, 17 (1), 25–33.
10. Kelly, D. K. Classroom Research and Interactive Learning: Assessing the Impact on Adult Learners and Faculty. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Claremont Graduate School, Clare-mont, Calif., 1993. (Order Number DA 9330348)
11. Kozma, R. B. ‘Communication, Rewards, and the Use of Classroom Innovations.’ Journal of Higher Education, 1979, 50 (6), 761–771.
12. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., and McKeachie, W. J. A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. (Tech. Report No. 91-B-004). Ann Arbor: Regents of the University of Michigan, School of Education, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, 1991.
13. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. (3rd ed.) New York: Free Press, 1983.
14. Schön, D. A. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.
15. Steadman, M. H. CATs for Community Colleges: Changing Both Sides of the Teaching and Learning Equation. Executive Summary of Practitioner-Based Research Project, Saratoga Springs, N.Y.: National Center on Adult Learning, Empire State College, 1994a.
16. Steadman, M. H. Implementation and Impact of Classroom Assessment Techniques in Community Colleges. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1994b. (UMI Microform no. 9528688)
17. Sternberg, R. J. ‘Criteria for Intellectual Skills Training.’ Educational Researcher, 1983, 12, 6–12.