The effect of preceptorship rurality on students' self-perceived clinical competency

Family Medicine

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 404-409

  Lacy, Naomi L ^a,b   Paulman, Paul M ^a   Hartman, Teresa L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPETENCE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PERCEPTION; POPULATION DENSITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RURAL AREA; SKILL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; URBAN POPULATION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FAMILY PRACTICE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; NEBRASKA; PRECEPTORSHIP; QUESTIONNAIRES; RURAL POPULATION; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 20344382741     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Backer EL, McIlvain HE, Paulman PM, Ramaekers RC. Characteristics of successful family physicians in rural Nebraska: a qualitative study of physician interviews. J Rural Health 2005;in press.
2. Rooks L, Watson RT, Harris JO. A primary care preceptorship for first-year medical students coordinated by an Area Health Education Center program: a 6-year review. Acad Med 2001;76(5):489-92.
3. Gjerde CL, Levy BT, Xakellis GC, Jr. Unique learning contributions of a family medicine preceptorship. Fam Med 1998;30(6):410-6.
4. Kalina C, Frye E, Lloyd J, Painter P, Caraher M. Evaluation of medical knowledge in an undergraduate ambulatory care experience. Acad Med 1995;70(2):166.
5. Chaytors RG, Szafran O, Crutcher RA. Rural-urban and gender differences in procedures performed by family practice residency graduates. Fam Med 2001;33(10):766-71.
6. Irigoyen MM, Kurth RJ, Schmidt HJ. Learning primary care in medical school: does specialty or geographic location of the teaching site make a difference? Am J Med 1999;106(5):561-4.
7. Leone-Perkins M, Schnuth RL, Lipsky MS. Students' evaluations of teaching and learning experiences at community- and residency-based practices. Fam Med 1999;31(8):572-7.
8. Riesenberg LA, Biddle WB, Erney SL. Medical student and faculty perceptions of desirable primary care teaching site characteristics. Med Educ 2001;35(7):660-5.
9. Economic Research Service USDA. Measuring rurality: rural-urban continuum codes. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture, 2004.
10. Gordon MJ. Self-assessment programs and their implications for health professions training. Acad Med 1992;67(10):672-9.
11. Steinwald B, Steinwald C. The effect of preceptorship and rural training programs on physicians' practice location decisions. Med Care 1975;13(3):219-29.
12. Calhoun JG, Ten Haken JD, Frank KA, et al. Perceived performance and clinical experiences: a comparative evaluation across five clerkships. Proc Annu Conf Res Med Educ 1986;25:279-84.
13. Linn BS, Zeppa R. Effect of the surgical clerkship on student perception of essential skills and self-assessed abilities. Ann Surg 1982;195(1):50-64.
14. Little M, Rodnick JE. Evaluating student experiences in a family medicine clerkship. Fam Med 1988;20(5):347-51.
15. Scott CS, Barrows HS, Brock DM, Hunt DD. Clinical behaviors and skills that faculty from 12 institutions judged were essential for medical students to acquire. Acad Med 1991;66(2):106-11.
16. Michener JL, Parkerson GR Jr, Munning KA. Clinical skills acquired during a clerkship in family medicine. J Med Educ 1986;61(10):808-15.
17. Harris DL, Bluhm HP. An evaluation of primary care preceptorships. J Fam Pract 1977;5(4):577-9.
18. Jacques LB. Incremental change in student knowledge during a third-year family medicine clerkship. Fam Med 1997;29(7):477-82.
19. Carney PA, Dietrich AJ, Eliassen S, Pipas C, Donahue D. Differences in ambulatory teaching and learning by gender match of preceptors and students. Fam Med 2000;32(9):618-23.