Effect of pacemaker rate-adaptation on 24h beat-to-beat heart rate and blood pressure profiles

Europace

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 366-373

  Quaglione, Raffaele ^a   Calcagnini, Giovanni ^b   Censi, Federica ^b   Malavasi, Mario ^a   Raveggi, Marco ^c   Biancalana, Gianluca ^c   Bartolini, Pietro ^b   Critelli, Giuseppe ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO SUPERIORE DI SANITÀ   (Italy)

^c Biotronik Seda   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blood pressure; Heart rate; Rate responsive pacing

Indexed keywords

AMIODARONE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DIGOXIN; PROPAFENONE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CROSSOVER PROCEDURE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM PACING; HEART PACING; HEART RATE; HEART RHYTHM; HEART VENTRICLE EXTRASYSTOLE; HEART VENTRICLE PACING; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RISK REDUCTION; RR INTERVAL; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL;

EID: 20344375908     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eupc.2005.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. I. Kruse K. Arnman T.B. Conradson A comparison of the acute and long term hemodynamic effects of ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing. Circulation 65 1982 846-855
2. J.M. Stone R.D. Bhakta J. Lutgen Dual chamber sequential pacing management of sinus node dysfunction: Advantages over single chamber pacing. Am Heart J 104 1982 1319-1327
3. E.J. Perrins C.A. Morley R. Sutton et al. Randomised controlled trial of physiological and ventricular pacing. Br Heart J 50 1983 112-117
4. B.E. Kristensson K. Arnman L. Ryden Physiological versus single rate ventricular pacing: A dual blind cross-over study Pacing. Clin Electrophysiol 8 1985 73-84
5. A. Dritsas J. Joshi S.C. Webb et al. Beat-to-beat variability in stroke volume during VVI pacing as predictor of hemodynamic benefit from DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 16 1993 1713-1718
6. R.I. Jones P.M. Cashman R.S. Hornung et al. Ambulatory blood pressure and assessment of pacemaker function. Br Heart J 55 1986 462-468
7. D.E. Rediker K.A. Eagle S. Homma et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. Am J Cardiol 61 1988 323-329
8. T.A. Buckingam D.L. Janosik A.C. Pearson Pacemaker hemodynamics: clinical implications. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 34 1992 347-366
9. J.A. Taylor C.A. Morillo D.L. Eckberg et al. Higher sympathetic nerve activity during ventricular (VVI) than during dual chamber (DDD) pacing. J Am Coll Cardiol 28 1996 1753-1758
10. M. Schaldach E. Ebner H. Hutten et al. Right ventricular conductance to establish closed-loop pacing. Eur Heart J 13 Suppl. E 1992 104-112
11. M. Schaldach A. Urbaszek J. Strobel et al. Rate-adaptive pacing using a closed-loop stimulation, autonomic nervous system controlled pacemaker. J Am Coll Cardiol 3 1995 22-32
12. C. Bingeli F. Duru R. Candinas et al. Autonomic nervous system-controlled cardiac pacing: A comparison between intracardiac impedance signal and muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 23 2000 1632-1637
13. M. Santini R. Ricci C. Pignalberi et al. Effect of autonomic nervous stressors on rate control in pacemaker using ventricular impedance signal. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 27 2004 24-32
14. E. Occhetta M. Bortnik R. Audoglio C. Vassanelli for the INVASY Study Investigators Closed loop stimulation in prevention of vasovagal syncope. Inotropy controlled pacing in vasovagal syncope (INVASY): A multicentre randomized, single blind, controlled study. Europace 6 6 2004 538-547
15. A. Puglisi G. Altamura F. Capestro et al. Impact of closed-loop stimulation, overdrive pacing, DDDR pacing mode on atrial tachyarrhythmia burden in brady-tachy syndrome. Eur Heart J 24 2003 1952-1961
16. B.P. Imholz W. Wieling G.A. van Montfrance et al. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: Assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res 38 1998 605-616
17. K.M. Channon M.R. Hargreaves O.J.M. Ormerod et al. Noninvasive beat-to-beat arterial blood pressure measurement during VVI and DDD pacing: Relationship to symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 20 1997 25-33
18. M. Schaldach H. Hutten Intracardiac impedance to determine sympathetic activity in rate responsive pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15 1992 1778-1786
19. A.M. Pichlmaier D. Braile E. Ebner et al. Autonomic nervous system controlled closed loop cardiac pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 15 1992 1787-1791
20. J. Pan W.J. Tompkins A real-time QRS detection algorithm IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 32 1985 230-236
21. Task Force Heart Rate Variability. Standard of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use Circulation 93 1996 1043-1065
22. J.A. Chiladakis A. Kalogeropoulos A.S. Manolis et al. Autonomic responses to single- and dual-chamber pacing. Am J Cardiol 93 2004 985-989
23. A.B. Davies B.A. Gould P.M. Cashman et al. Circadian rhythm of blood pressure in patients dependent on ventricular demand pacemakers. Br Heart J 52 1984 93-98