Ephrin A2 may play a role in axon guidance during hair cell regeneration

Laryngoscope

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1021-1025

  Lee, Kenneth H ^a   Warchol, Mark E ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Axon guidance; Cochlear implant; Eph; Ephrin; Hair cell regeneration

Indexed keywords

EPHRIN A2;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CELL REGENERATION; CHICKEN; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAIR CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; IMPLANTATION; NERVE CELL; NERVE FIBER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN ISOLATION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ANIMALS; AXONS; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CHICKENS; COCHLEAR NERVE; EPHRIN-A2; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GANGLION CYSTS; GENTAMICINS; HAIR CELLS; NERVE REGENERATION;

EID: 20144372526     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000162650.75806.A1     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Roland JT Jr, Fishman AJ, Alexiades G, et al. Electrode to modiolus proximity: a fluoroscopic and histologic analysis. Am J Otol 2000;21:218-225.
2. Fayad JN, Luxford W, Linthicum FH. The Clarion electrode positioner: temporal bone studies. Am J Otol 2000;21:226-229.
3. Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 1993;66:108-120.
4. Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clark GM, et al. Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 1998;118:313-326.
5. Young NM, Grohne KM. Comparison of pediatric Clarion recipients with and without the electrode positioner. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:195-199.
6. Wackym PA, Firszt JB, Gaggl W, et al. Electrophysiologic effects of placing cochlear implant electrodes in a perimodiolar position in young children. Laryngoscope 2004;114:71-76.
7. Mens LH, Boyle PJ, Mulder JJ. The Clarion Electrode positioner: approximation to the medial wall and current focussing? Audiol Neurootol 2003;8:166-175.
8. Ruben RJ. Development of the inner ear of the mouse: a radioautographic study of terminal mitoses. Acta Otolaryngol 1967;Suppl:1-44.
9. Cotanche DA. Regeneration of hair cell stereociliary bundles in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hearing Res 1987;30:181-195.
10. Cruz RM, Lambert PR, Rubel EW. Light microscopic evidence of hair cell regeneration after gentamicin toxicity in chick cochlea. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:1058-1062.
11. Cohen YE, Saunders JC. The effects of sound overexposure on the spectral response patterns of nucleus magnocellularis in the neonatal chick. Exp Brain Res 1993;95:202-212.
12. Flanagan JG, Vanderhaeghen P. The ephrins and Eph receptors in neural development. Annu Rev Neurosci 1998;21:309-345.
13. Cheng HJ, Nakamoto M, Bergemann AD, et al. Complementary gradients in expression and binding of ELF-1 and Mek4 in development of the topographic retinotectal projection map. Cell 1995;82:371-381.
14. Nakamoto M, Cheng HJ, Friedman GC, et al. Topographically specific effects of ELF-1 on retinal axon guidance in vitro and retinal axon mapping in vivo. Cell 1996;86:755-766.
15. Pickles JO, van Heumen WR. The expression of messenger RNAs coding for growth factors, their receptors, and eph-class receptor tyrosine kinases in normal and ototoxically damaged chick cochleae. Dev Neurosci 1997;19:476-487.
16. Bianchi LM, Gale NW. Distribution of Eph-related molecules in the developing and mature cochlea. Hear Res 1998;117:161-172.
17. Matsunaga T, Greene MI, Davis JG. Distinct expression patterns of eph receptors and ephrins relate to the structural organization of the adult rat peripheral vestibular system. Eur J Neurosci 2000;12:1599-1616.
18. van Heumen WR, Claxton C, Pickles JO. Expression of EphA4 in developing inner ears of the mouse and guinea pig. Hear Res 2000;139:42-50.
19. Siddiqui SA, Cramer KS. Differential expression of Eph receptors and ephrins in the cochlear ganglion and eight cranial nerve of the chick embryo. J Comp Neurol 2005;482:309-319.
20. Roberson DW, Alosi JA, Messana EP, et al. Effect of violation of the labyrinth on the sensory epithelium in the chick cochlea. Hear Res 2000;141:155-164.
21. Janas JD, Cotanche DA, Rubel EW. Avian cochlear hair cell regeneration: stereological analyses of damage and recovery from a single high dose of gentamicin. Hear Res 1995;92:17-29.
22. Stone JS, Rubel EW. Cellular studies of auditory hair cell regeneration in birds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:11714-11721.
23. Chen L, Trautwein PG, Shero M, et al. Tuning, spontaneous activity and tonotopic map in chicken cochlear ganglion neurons following sound-induced hair cell loss and regeneration. Hear Res 1996;98:152-164.