Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis on logMAR visual acuity and contrast sensitivity;Vliv refrakčních zákroků (LASIK) na rozlišovací schopnost oka (první výsledky)

Ceska a Slovenska Oftalmologie

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 205-212

  Hejcmanová, Markéta ^a,b   Horackova M ^a   Vlkova E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRNO   (Czech Republic)

^b NONE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Contrast sensitivity; LASIK; logMAR charts

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MALE; MYOPIA; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REFRACTION ERROR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ACUITY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOPIA; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 20044383251     PISSN: 12119059     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Giessler, S., Duncker, G. I. W.: Short-term visual rehabilitation after LASIK. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol., 239, 2001: 603-608.
2. Chan, J. W. W., Edwards, M. H., Woo, G. C. et al: Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. One-year follow-up. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 28, 2002: 1774-1779.
3. Katsanevaki, V.: Contrasting the quality of refractive results. Eurotimes, 10, 2003: 17.
4. Langrová, H., Derse, M., Hejcmanová, D. et al.: Effect of photorefractive keratectomy and Laser in situ keratomileusis in high myopia on logMAR visual acuity and contrast sensitivity. Acta Medica (Hradec Králové), 46, 2003: 15-18.
5. Langrová, H., Hejcmanová, D., Peregrin, J.: Jak určovat vizus? Čs. Oftal., 52, 1996: 58-63.
6. Lee, H. K., Koh, I. H., Choe, C. M. et al: Reproducibility of morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing with the Visual Capacity Analyzer. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 29, 2003, 1776-1779
7. Montés-Micó, R., Charman, W. N.: Choice of spatial frequency for contrast sensitivity evaluation after corneal refractive surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 17, 2001: 646-651.
8. Montés-Micó, R., Espana, E., Menezo, J. L.: Mesopic contrast sensitivity function after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 19, 2003: 353-356.
9. Mutyala, S., McDonald, M. B., Scheinblum, K. A. et al.: Contrast sensitivity evaluation after laser in situ keratomileusis. Ophthalmology, 107, 2000, 10: 1864-1867.
10. Nakamura K., Bissen-Miyajima, H., Toda, I: Effect of laser in situ keratomileusis correction on contrast visual acuity. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 27, 2001: 357-361.
11. Naroo, S. A.: Refractive Surgery: A guide to Assessment and Management. 1. vyd., London, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004, 82.
12. Peregrin, J., Hejcmanová, D., Svěráková, H. et al.: Měření a hodnocení zrakové ostrosti. Čs. Oftal., 43, 1987: 75-87.
13. Peregrin, J., Hejcmanová, D., Kalinová, M. et al.: Česká státní norma pro určování vizu. Čs. Oftal., 48, 1999: 48.
14. Peregrin, J., Svěrák, J., Hartmann, M. et al.: Citlivost na kontrast u člověka. Čs. Oftal., 44, 1988: 389-399.
15. Pérez-Santonja, J. J., Sakla, H. F., Alió, J. L.: Contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 24, 1998: 183-189.
16. Quesnel, N. M., Lovasik, J. V., Ferremi, C. et al.: Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and the contrast sensitivity function. J. Cataract Refract. Surg., 30, 2004: 1209-1218.
17. Sano, Z., Carr, J., Takei, K.: Videokeratography after Excimer Laser in Situ Keratomileusis for Myopia. Ophthalmology, 107, 2000: 674-684.
18. Sugar, A., Rapuano, C. J., Culbertson, W. W. et al.: Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: Safety and Efficacy. Ophthalmology, 109, 2002: 175-187.