Reproducibility of morphoscopic contrast sensitivity testing with the visual capacity analyzer

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 1776-1779

  Lee, Hyung Kuen ^b   Koh, Hwan ^b   Choe, Chul Myong ^b   Kim, Chan Yoon ^b   Hong, Young Jae ^b   Seong, Gong Je ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HUMAN TISSUE; LUMINANCE; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; TECHNICAL AID; VISION;

EID: 0141866702     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(03)00044-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ghaith AA, Daniel J, Stulting RD, et al. Contrast sensitivity and glare disability after radial keratotomy and photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116:12-18
2. Verdon W, Bullimore M, Maloney RK. Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy; a prospective study. Arch Ophthalmol 1996; 114:1465-1472
3. Brunette I, Gresset J, Boivin J-F, et al. Functional outcome and satisfaction after photorefractive keratectomy. Part 2: survey of 690 patients; the Canadian Refractive Surgery Research Group. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:1790-1796
4. Hersh PS, Steinert RF, Brint SF. Photorefractive keratectomy versus laser in situ keratomileusis; comparison of optical side effects; Summit PRK-LASIK Study Group. Ophthalmology 2000; 107:925-933
5. Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M. Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg retina tomograph. J Glaucoma 1993; 2:101-103
6. Fantes FE, Hanna KD, Waring GO III, et al. Wound healing after excimer laser keratomileusis (photorefractive keratectomy) in monkeys. Arch Ophthalmol 1990; 108:665-675
7. Wu WCS, Stark WJ, Green WR. Corneal wound healing after 193-nm excimer laser keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 1991; 109:1426-1432
8. Wilson SE, Mohan RR, Hong J-W, et al. The wound healing response after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy; elusive control of biological variability and effect on custom laser vision correction. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119:889-896
9. McDonald JE II, El-Moatassem Kolb AM, Decker BB. Effect of brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% on pupil size in normal eyes under different luminance conditions. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:560-564
10. Endl MJ, Martinez CE, Klyce SD, et al. Effect of larger ablation zone and transition zone on corneal optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch Ophthalmol 2001; 119:1159-1164
11. Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T. Increased higher-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery; a problem of subclinical decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001; 27:362-369
12. El Danasoury MA. Prospective bilateral study of night glare after laser in situ keratomileusis with single zone and transition zone ablation. J Refract Surg 1998; 14:512-516
13. Hamer RD, Mayer DL. The development of spatial vision. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, eds, Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology: Basic Sciences. Philadelphia, PA, WB Saunders, 1994; 578-602
14. Comerford JP. Vision evaluation using contrast sensitivity functions. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983; 60:394-398
15. Jindra LF, Zemon V. Contrast sensitivity testing: a more complete assessment of vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15:141-148
16. Campbell FW, Green DG. Optical and retinal factors affecting visual resolution. J Physiol 1965; 181:576-593
17. Loshin DS, White J. Contrast sensitivity; the visual rehabilitation of the patient with macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102:1303-1306
18. Woo GC. Contrast sensitivity function as a diagnostic tool in low vision. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1985; 62:648-651
19. Ginsburg AP. A new contrast sensitivity vision test chart. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1984; 61:403-407
20. Della Sala S, Bertoni G, Somazzi L, et al. Impaired contrast sensitivity in diabetic patients with and without retinopathy: a new technique for rapid assessment. Br J Ophthalmol 1985; 69:136-142
21. Hyvärinen L. Classification of visual impairment and disability. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 1985; 215:1-16
22. Regan D, Giaschi DE, Fresco BB. Measurement of glare sensitivity in cataract patients using low-contrast letter charts. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1993; 13:115-123
23. Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vision Sci 1988; 2:187-199