Identification of Rhus succedanea L. cultivars using elliptic fourier descriptors based on fruit shape

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 53, Issue 5-6, 2004, Pages 221-226

  Hiraoka, Y ^a   Kuramoto, N ^a  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cultivar identification; Elliptic fourier descriptor; Fruit shape; Mahalanobis' generalized distance; Randomization test; Rhus succedanea L.

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

ELLIPTIC FOURIER DESCRIPTORS; FRUIT SHAPE; RANDOMIZATION TEST; RHUS SUCCEDANEA L. CULTIVARS;

FRUITS;

DATA BASES; E I S; FRUITS; PROBABILITY; VARIETIES;

HEDERA; RHUS; TOXICODENDRON SUCCEDANEUM;

CONTOUR SHAPE; CULTIVAR IDENTIFICATION; ELLIPTIC FOURIER DESCRIPTOR; FRUIT SHAPE; GENERALIZED DISTANCES; MAHALANOBI' GENERALIZED DISTANCE; MAHALANOBIS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; RANDOMIZATION TESTS; RHUS SUCCEDANEUM L;

EID: 20044381183     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. AOKI, Y., YAMAUCHI, M. and NAKASHIMA, Y. (1952): Study of identification in Rhus succedanea L. Fukuoka Pref. Forest Exp. Stn.: 1-85 (in Japanese).
2. AOKI, Y., YAMAUCHI, M. and TAKESHITA, K. (1953): Study of identification in Rhus succedanea L. (2) Identification based on fruit shape. Fukuoka Pref. Forest Exp. Stn.: 1-25 (in Japanese).
3. BIERBAUM, R. M. and FERSON, S. (1986): Do symbiotic pea crabs decrease growth rate in mussels? Biol. Bull. 170: 51-61.
4. BOOKSTEIN, F. L., STRAUSS, R. E., HUMPHRIES, J. M., CHERONOFF, B., ELDER, R. L. and SMITH, G. R. (1982): A comment upon the uses of Fourier methods in systematics. Syst. Zool. 31: 85-92.
5. DIAZ, G., ZUCCARELLI, A., PELLIGRA, I. and GHIANI, A. (1989): Elliptic Fourier analysis of cell and nuclear shapes. Comp. Biomed. Res. 22: 405-414.
6. EHRLICH, R. and WEINBERG, B. (1970): An exact method for characterization of grain shape. J. Sed. Pet. 40: 205-212.
7. EHRLICH, R. B., PHARR, JR. and HEALY-WILLIAMS, N. (1983): Comments on the validity of Fourier descriptors in systematics: A Reply to BOOKSTEIN et al. Syst. Zool. 32: 202-206.
8. FERSON, S., ROHLF, F. J. and KOEHN, R. K. (1985): Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Syst. Zool. 34: 59-68.
9. FREEMAN, H. (1974): Computer processing of line drawing images. Comp. Surv. 6: 57-97.
10. FURUTA, N., NINOMIYA, S., TAKAHASHI, N., OHMORI, H. and UKAI, Y. (1995): Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breed. Sci. 45: 315-320.
11. GOTO, S., WATANABE, A. and IKEDA, K. (1997): Use of RAPD markers for cultivar identification in Rhus succedanea L. J. Jpn. For. Soc. 79: 229-233 (in Japanese with English summary).
12. IWATA, H., NIIKURA, S., MATSUURA, S., TAKANO, Y. and UKAI, Y. (1998): Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 102: 143-149.
13. IWATA, H., NIIKURA, S., MATSUURA, S., TAKANO, Y. and UKAI, Y. (2000): Diallel analysis of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed. Sci. 50: 73-80.
14. IWATA, H. (2001): SHAPE Ver. 1.2. A software package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Free program distributed by the author over the internet from the Home Page at http://cse.naro.affrc.go.jp/iwatah/shape/index.html.
15. IWATA, H., NESUMI, H., NINOMIYA, S., TAKANO, Y. and UKAI, Y. (2002a): Diallel analysis of leaf shape variations of citrus varieties based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed. Sci. 52: 89-94.
16. IWATA, H., NESUMI, H., NINOMIYA, S., TAKANO, Y. and UKAI, Y. (2002b): The evaluation of genotype environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed. Sci. 52: 243-252.
17. KUHL, F. P. and GIARDINA, C. R (1982): Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp. Graph. Image Proc. 18: 236-258.
18. ROHLF, F. J. and ARCHIE, J. W. (1984): A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33: 302-317.
19. WHITE, R. J., RENTICE, H. C. and VERWIST, T. (1988): Automated image acquisition and morphometric description. Can. J. Bot. 66: 450-459.