The evaluation of genotype x environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and elliptic fourier descriptors

Breeding Science

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 243-251

  Iwata, Hiroyoshi ^a   Nesumi, Hirohisa ^b   Ninomiya, Seishi ^a   Takano, Yasushi ^c   Ukai, Yasuo ^c  

^a NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF FRUIT TREE SCIENCE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model; Citrus; Elliptic Fourier descriptors; Genotype x environment (GE) interactions; Image analysis; Joint linear regression analysis (JRA) model; Leaf morphology

Indexed keywords

AMMI; AMMI VISNAGA; CITRUS;

EID: 0036918138     PISSN: 13447610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.52.243     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Finlay,K.W. and K.W.Wilkinson (1963) The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 742-754.
2. Freeman,H. (1974) Computer processing of line drawing images. Comp. Surv. 6: 57-97.
3. Furuta,N., S.Ninomiya, S.Takahashi, H.Ohmori and Y.Ukai (1995) Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaflet shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breed. Sci. 45: 315-320.
4. Gauch,H.G. (1988) Model selection and validation for yield trials with interaction. Biometrics 44: 705-715.
5. Iwata,H., H.Nesumi, S.Ninomiya, Y.Takano and Y.Ukai (1994) Evaluation of leaf shape of citrus varieties by elliptic Fourier analysis. Jpn. J. Breed. 44 (Suppl. 2): 211 (in Japanese).
6. Iwata,H., S.Niikura, S.Matsuura, Y.Takano and Y.Ukai (1998) Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 102: 143-149.
7. Iwata,H., S.Niikura, S.Matsuura, Y.Takano and Y.Ukai (2000) Diallel analysis of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Breed. Sci. 50: 73-80.
8. Keefe,P.D. and S.R.Draper (1986) The measurement of new characters for cultivar identification in wheat using machine vision. Seed Sci. Tech. 14: 715-724.
9. Kuhl,F.P. and C.R.Giardina (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comp. Graph. Ima. Proc. 18: 236-258.
10. Mantel,N.A. (1967) The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27: 209-220.
11. McLellan,T. (1993) The roles of heterochrony and heteroblasty in the diversification of leaf shapes in Begonia dregei (Begoniaceae). Am. J. Bot. 80: 796-804.
12. Muir,W., W.E.Nyquist and S.Xu (1992) Alternative partitioning of the genotype-by-environment interaction. Theor. Appl. Genet. 84: 193-200.
13. Ohsawa,R., T.Tsutsumi, H.Uehara, H.Namai and S.Ninomiya (1998) Quantitative evaluation of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) kernel shape by elliptic Fourier descriptor. Euphytica 101: 175-183.
14. Okuno,T. (1950) A method for analyzing yield trial data from multiple locations. Nougyogijutsu 5: 10 (in Japanese).
15. Rohlf,F.J. and J.W.Archie (1984) A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Syst. Zool. 33: 302-317.
16. Swingle,W.T. (1967) The botany of citrus and its wild relatives. In "The Citrus Industry, Volume 1, History, World Distribution, Botany and Varieties" Reuther,W., H.J.Webber and L.D.Batchelor (eds.), Univ. California, California. p. 190-430.
17. Tanaka,T. (1969) Misunderstanding with regards citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull. Univ. Osaka Prefect., Ser. B. 21: 139-145.
18. Toyohara,H., K.Irie, W.Ding, H.Iwata, H.Fujimaki, F.Kikuchi and Y.Ukai (2000) Evaluation of tuber shape of yam (Dioscorea alta L.) cultivars by image analysis and elliptic Fourier descriptors. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 32: 31-37.
19. White,R., H.C.Rentice and T.Verwist (1988) Automated image acquisition and morphometric description. Can. J. Bot. 66: 450-459.
20. Wricke,G. (1962) Über eine methode zur erfassung der ökologischen streubreite in feldversucen. Z. Pflanzenzüchtung 47: 92-96.
21. Yates,F. and W.G.Cochran (1938) The analysis of groups of experiments. J. Agri. Sci. 28: 556-580.