Matrix models as a tool for understanding invasive plant and native plant interactions

Conservation Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 917-928

  Thomson, Diane M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Joint Science Department   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological invasion; Competition; Disturbance; Invasive plants; Matrix model; Rare plants

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL INVASION; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION; PLANT COMMUNITY;

OENOTHERA; OENOTHERA DELTOIDES HOWELLII; POACEAE; PRIMULA;

EID: 20044375633     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.004108.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Brigham, C. A., and D. M. Thomson. 2003. Approaches to modeling population viability in plants: an overview. Pages 145-171 in C. A. Brigham and M. W. Schwartz, editors. Population viability in plants. Springer-Verlag, New York.
2. Byers, J. E., et al. 2002. Directing research to reduce the impacts of nonindigenous species. Conservation Biology 16:630-640.
3. Caswell, H. 2001. Matrix population models: construction, analysis and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
4. Crouse, D. T., L. B. Crowder, and H. Caswell. 1987. A stage-based population model for Loggerhead sea turtles and implications for conservation. Ecology 68:1412-1423.
5. D'Antonio, C. M., and P. Vitousek. 1992. Biological invasions by exotic grasses, the grass/fire cycle, and global change. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:63-87.
6. Doak, D. F., P. Kareiva, and B. Klepetka. 1994. Modeling population viability for the desert tortoise in the Western Mojave Desert. Ecological Applications 4:446-460.
7. Doak, D. F., D. M. Thomson and E. S. Jules. 2002. PVA for plants: understanding the demographic consequences of seed banks for population health. Pages 312-337 in S. Beissinger and D. McCullough, editors. Population viability analysis. New York, Springer-Verlag.
8. Fieberg, J., and S. P. Ellner. 2001. Stochastic matrix models for conservation and management: a comparative review of methods. Ecology Letters 4:244-266.
9. Greene, J. A. 1995. Three reproductive ecology studies in the narrow endemic Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii. M.S. thesis. Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, California.
10. Gross, K., J. R. Lockwood III, C. C. Frost, and W. F. Morris. 1998. Modeling controlled burning and trampling reduction for conservation of Hudsonia montana. Conservation Biology 12:1291-1301.
11. Hobbs, R. J., and L. F Huenneke. 1992. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: implications for conservation. Conservation Biology 6:324-337.
12. Hughes, F.,P. Vitousek, and T. Tunison. 1991. Alien grass invasion and fire in the seasonal submontane zone of Hawai'i. Ecology 72:743-746.
13. Kalisz, S., and M. A. McPeek. 1992. Demography of an age-structured annual: resampled projection matrices, elasticity analyses, and seed bank effects. Ecology 73:1082-1093.
14. Kaye, T. N., K. L. Pendergrass, K. Finley, and J. B. Kauffman. 2001. The effect of fire on the population viability of an endangered prairie plant. Ecological Applications 11:1366-1380.
15. Kolar, C. S., and D. M. Lodge. 2001. Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:199-204.
16. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 1999. Elton revisited: a review of evidence linking diversity and invisibility. Oikos 87:15-26.
17. Levine, J. M., and C. M. D'Antonio. 2003. Forecasting biological invasions, with increasing international trade. Conservation Biology 17:322-326.
18. Levine, J. M., M. Vila, C. M. D'Antonio, J. S. Dukes, K. Grigulis and S. Lavorel. 2003. Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 270:775-781.
19. Maschinski, J., R. Frye, and S. Rutman. 1997. Demography and population viability of an endangered plant species before and after protection from trampling. Conservation Biology 11:990-999.
20. McEvoy, P. B., and E. M. Coombs. 1999. Biological control of plant invaders: regional patterns, field experiments, and structured population models. Ecological Applications 9:387-401.
21. Morales, M. A., D. W. Inouye, M. J. Leigh, and G. Lowe. 2003. Considering interactions: incorporating biotic interactions into viability assessment. Pages 59-91 in C. A. Brigham and M. W. Schwartz, editors. Population viability in plants. Springer-Verlag, New York.
22. Morris, W. F., and D. F. Doak. 2002. Quantitative conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts. (Also available from http://www.sinauer.com/PVA/.)
23. Nantel, P.,D. Gagnon, and A. Nault. 1996. Population viability analysis of American ginseng and wild leek harvested in stochastic environments. Conservation Biology 10:608-621.
24. Parker, I. M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus scoparius: a matrix model approach. Ecological Applications 10:726-743.
25. Parker, I. M., and S. H. Reichard. 1998. Critical issues in invasion biology for conservation science. Pages 283-305 in P.L. Fiedler and P.M. Kareiva, editors. Conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, New York.
26. Pavlik, B. M., and E. Manning. 1993. Assessing limitation on the growth of endangered plant populations: I. Experimental demography of Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustatum and Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii. Biological Conservation 65:257-265.
27. Pavlik, B. M., N. Ferguson, and M. Nelson. 1993. Assessing limitations on the growth of endangered plant populations: II. Seed production and seed bank dynamics of Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustatum and Oenothera deltoides ssp. howellii. Biological Conservation 65:267-278.
28. Reichard, S. H., and C. W. Hamilton. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants into North America. Conservation Biology 11:193-203.
29. Rejmanek, M., and D. M. Richardson. 1996. What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77:1055-1661.
30. Schemske, D. W., B. C. Husband, M. H. Ruckelshaus, C. Goodwillie, I. M. Parker, and J. G. Bishop. 1994. Evaluating approaches to the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology 75:584-606.
31. Shea, K., and D. Kelly. 1998. Estimating biocontrol agent impact with matrix models: Carduus nutans in New Zealand. Ecological Applications 8:824-832.
32. Stohlgren, T. J., et al. 1999. Exotic plant species invade hot spots of native plant diversity. Ecological Monographs 69:25-46.
33. Thomson, D. M. 2005. Measuring the effects of invasive species on the demography of a rare endemic plant. Biological Invasions 7: in press.
34. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 1980. Recovery plan for three endangered species endemic to Antioch Dunes, California. USFWS, Portland, Oregon.
35. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2001. Draft comprehensive conservation plan and environmental assessment, Antioch Dunes National Wildlife Refuge. USFWS, Sacramento, California.
36. Wilcove, D. S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607-615.