Removing carious dentin using a polymer instrument without anesthesia versus a carbide bur with anesthesia

Journal of the American Dental Association

Volumn 136, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 643-651

  Allen, Kenneth L ^b   Salgado, Teresita L ^b   Janal, Malvin N ^c   Thompson, Van P ^a,b  

^a SS White Burs ^*

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c RUTGERS SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Caries removal; Class I restoration; Local anesthesia; Polymer instrument

Indexed keywords

POLYMER;

ADULT; ANAMNESIS; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANXIETY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; DENTIN; DRILL; FEMALE; HEAT; HUMAN; MALE; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRESSURE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEPHONE; VIBRATION SENSE;

EID: 20044368710     PISSN: 00028177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0237     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Massler M. Changing concepts in the treatment of carious lesions. Br Dent J 1967;123:547-8.
2. Wei SH, Kaqueller JC, Massler M. Remineralization of carious dentin. J Dent Res 1968;47:381-91.
3. Longbottom C, Huysmans MC, Pitts NB, Los P, Bruce PG. Detection of dental decay and its extent using a.c. impedance spectroscopy. Nat Med 1996;2(2):235-7.
4. McComb D. Caries-detector dyes: how accurate and useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66(4):195-8.
5. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro evaluation of five alternative methods of carious dentine excavation. Caries Res 2004(2):144-50.
6. Banerjee A, Watson TF, Kidd EA. Dentine caries: take it or leave it? Dent Update 2000;27(6):272-6.
7. Pashley EL, Talman R, Horner JA, Pashley DH. Permeability of normal versus carious dentin. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7(5):207-11.
8. Pashley DH, Pashley EL, Carvalho RM, Tay FR. The effects of dentin permeability on restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46(2):211-45, v-vi.
9. Mertz-Fairhurst EJ, Curtis JW Jr, Ergle JW, Rueggeberg FA, Adair SM. Ultraconservative and cariostatic sealed restorations: results at year 10. JADA 1998;129(1):55-66.
10. Anusavice KJ, Kincheloe JE. Comparison of pain associated with mechanical and chemomechanical removal of caries. J Dent Res 1987;66:1680-3.
11. Robbins A, Ragan MR. Dentist's influence on patient demand for local anesthesia with a chemomechanical system. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59(2):142-5.
12. Maragakis GM, Hahn P, Hellwig E. Chemomechanical caries removal: a comprehensive review of the literature. Int Dent J 2001;51:291-9.
13. Nadanovsky P, Cohen Carneiro F, Souza de Mello F. Removal of caries using only hand instruments: a comparison of mechanical and chemo-mechanicai methods. Caries Res 2001;35:384-9.
14. Fusayama T. A simple pain-free adhesive restorative system by minimal reduction and total etching. St. Louis: Ishiyaku EuroAmerica; 1993.
15. Fusayama T. Ideal cavity preparation for adhesive composites. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1993;1(2):55-62.
16. Kidd EA. The operative management of caries. Dent Update 1998;25(3):104-8, 10.
17. Yoshiyama M, Tay FR, Doi J, et al. Bonding of self-etch and total-etch adhesives to carious dentin. J Dent Res 2002;81:556-60.
18. Boston DW, inventor; Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, Philadelphia, assignee. Partial dentin caries excavator. U.S. patent 6347941. Feb. 19, 2002.
19. Boston DW, inventor; Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education, Philadelphia, assignee. Selective dentin caries excavator. U.S. patent 6106291. Aug. 22, 2000.
20. Clark WC, Carroll JD, Yang JC, Janal MN. Multidimensional scaling reveals two dimensions of thermal pain. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1986;12(1):103-7.
21. Clark WC, Yang JC. Applications of sensory decision theory to problems in laboratory and clinical pain. In: Melzack R, ed. Pain measurement and assessment. New York: Raven Press; 1983.
22. Corah NL. Development of a dental anxiety scale. J Dent Res 1969;48:596.
23. Banerjee A, Kidd EA, Watson TF. In vitro validation of carious dentin removed using different excavation criteria. Am J Dent 2003;16:228-30.
24. Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: a microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993;174:245-8.
25. Lennon AM. Fluorescence-aided caries excavation (FACE) compared to conventional method. Oper Dent 2003;28:341-5.
26. Yip HK, Stevenson AG, Beeley JA. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994;176:417-21.
27. Ceballos L, Camejo DG, Victoria Fuentes M, et al. Microtensile bond strength of total-etch and self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentine. J Dent 2003;31:469-77.
28. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1995;74:1679-88.
29. Nakajima M, Sano H, Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH. Bond strengths of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2000;25(1):2-10.
30. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH. Comparison of conventional vs. self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2000;25(3):163-9.