|
Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 163-169
|
Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesive bonds to caries-affected dentin.
a a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE;
CLEARFIL AP X;
CLEARFIL AP-X;
DENTIN BONDING AGENT;
FLUORIDE VARNISH;
FLUOROBOND;
METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE;
RESIN CEMENT;
SINGLE BOND;
TOOTH CEMENT;
WATER;
ADHESION;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
ARTICLE;
CHEMISTRY;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
DENTAL ACID ETCHING;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CARE;
DENTAL CARIES;
DENTIN;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MATERIALS TESTING;
MOLAR TOOTH;
PATHOLOGY;
REGRESSION ANALYSIS;
SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY;
STATISTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTY;
TEMPERATURE;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
ULTRASTRUCTURE;
ACID ETCHING, DENTAL;
ADHESIVENESS;
ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE;
BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE;
DENTAL BONDING;
DENTAL CARIES;
DENTAL CEMENTS;
DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS;
DENTIN;
DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS;
FLUORIDES, TOPICAL;
HUMANS;
LEAST-SQUARES ANALYSIS;
MATERIALS TESTING;
METHACRYLATES;
MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING;
MOLAR;
RESIN CEMENTS;
STATISTICS;
SURFACE PROPERTIES;
TEMPERATURE;
TENSILE STRENGTH;
WATER;
|
EID: 0034188985
PISSN: 03617734
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (106)
|
References (0)
|