Utility of three dimension fast asymmetric spin-echo (3D-FASE) sequences in MR sialographic sequences: Model and volunteer studies

Oral Diseases

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 35-43

  Morimoto, Yasuhiro ^a,b   Tanaka, T ^a   Kito, S ^a   Tominaga, K ^b   Yoshioka, I ^b   Yamashita, Y ^b   Shibuya, T ^b   Matsufuji, Y ^c   Kodama, M ^b   Takahashi, T ^b   Fukuda, J ^b   Ohba, T ^a  

^a Kyushu Dental College   (Japan)

^b KYUSHU DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

^c TOSHIBA MEDICAL SYSTEMS CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

3D FASE sequences; Magnetic resonance sialography; Salivary glands; Virtual endoscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SIALOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PAROTID GLAND; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALIVARY GLAND; SIALOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSION FAST ASYMMETRIC SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAROTID GLAND; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SALIVARY DUCTS;

EID: 19944434222     PISSN: 1354523X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2004.01052.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Becker M, Marchal F, Becker CD et al (2000). Sialolithiasis and salivary ductal stenosis: Diagnostic accuracy of MR sialography with three-dimensional extended-phase conjugate-symmetry rapid spin-echo sequence. Radiology 217: 347-358.
2. Davis CP, Ladd ME, Romanowski BJ et al (1996). Human aorta: preliminary results with virtual endoscopy based on three-dimensional MR imaging data sets. Radiology 198: 573-578.
3. Fischbach R, Kugel H, Ernst S et al (1997). MR sialography: initial experience using a T2-weighted fast SE sequence. J Comput Assist Tomogr 21: 826-830.
4. Hebert G, Ouimet-Oliva D, Nicolet V et al (1993). Imaging of the salivary gland. Can Assoc Radial J 44: 342-349.
5. Ichikawa T, Nitatori T, Hachiya J et al (1996). Breath-held MR choloangiopancreatography with half-averaged single shot hybrid rare acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence: comparison of fast GRE and SE sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 20: 798-802.
6. Irie H, Honda H, Tajima T et al (1998). Optimal MR cholangiopanreatographic sequence and its clinical application. Radiology 206: 379-387.
7. Jager L, Menauer F, Holzknecht N et al (2000). Sialolithiasis: MR sialography of the submandibular duct-an alternative to conventional sialography and US? Radiology 217: 665-671.
8. Lomas DJ, Carroll NR, Johnson G et al (1996). MR sialography. Work in progress. Radiology 200: 129-133.
9. Mandelblatt SM, Braun IF, Davis PC et al (1987). Parotid masses: MR imaging. Radiology 163: 411-414.
10. Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Yoshioka I et al (2002). Virtual endoscopic view of salivary gland ducts using MR sialography data from three dimension fast asymmetric spin-echo (3D-FASE) sequences: a preliminary study. Oral Dis 8: 268-274.
11. Morimoto Y, Tanaka T, Tominaga K et al (in press). Clinical application of MR sialographic 3D-reconstruction imaging and MR virtual endoscopy for salivary gland duct analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 62: 1237-45.
12. Murakami R, Baba Y, Baba T et al (1998). MR sialography using half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo (HASTE) sequences. Am J Neurodadiol 19: 959-961.
13. Naganawa S, Koshikawa T, Fukatsu H et al (2001). MR cisternography of the cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional fast asymmetrical spin-echo and three-dimensional constructive interference in the steady-state sequences. Am J Neuroradiol 22: 1179-1185.
14. Neri E, Caramella D, Falaschi F et al (1997). Virtual endoscopy of the aorta: segmentation artifacts with perspective surface rendering of spiral CT data sets. Radiology 205: 262.
15. Sakamoto M, Sasano T, Higano S et al (2001). Evaluation of pulse sequences used for magnetic resonance sialography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 30: 276-284.
16. Shojaku H, Shojaku H, Shimizu M et al (2000). MR sialographic evaluation of sialectasia of Stensen's duct: comparison with X-ray sialography and ultrasonography. Radiat Med 18: 143-145.
17. Tanaka T, Morimoto Y, Masumi S et al (2002). Utility of frequency-selective fat saturation T2-weighted MR images for the detection of joint effusion in the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 31: 305-312.
18. Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Wortham DG et al (1987a). Parotid masses: MR imaging. Radiology 163: 405-409.
19. Teresi LM, Kolin E, Lufkin RB et al (1987b). MR imaging of the intraparotid facial nerve: normal anatomy and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148: 995-1000.
20. Thibauly F, Halimi P, Bely N et al (1993). Internal architecture of the parotid gland at MR imaging: facial nerve or ductal system? Radiology 188: 701-704.
21. Varghese JC, Thornton F, Lucey BC et al (1999). A prospective comparative study of MR sialography and conventional sialography of salivary duct disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173: 1497-1503.
22. Yamashita Y, Abe Y, Tang Y et al (1997). In vitro and clinical studies of image acquisition in breath-hold MR cholangiopancreatography: single-shot projection technique versus multislice technique. Am J Roentgenol 168: 1449-1454.
23. Yang D, Kodama T, Tamura S et al (1999). Evaluation of the inner ear by 3D fast asymmetric spin echo (FASE) MR imaging: phantom and volunteer studies. Magn Reson Imaging 17: 171-182.
24. Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA (2000). Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology 216: 19-29.
25. Zenk J, Hosemann WG, Iro H (1998a). Diameters of the main excretory ducts of the adult human submandibular and parotid gland: a histologic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 85: 576-580.
26. Zenk J, Zikarsky B, Horsemann WG et al (1998b). The diameter of the Stenon and Wharton ducts. Significance for diagnosis and therapy. HNO 46: 980-985.