Transforming the radiological interpretation process: The SCAR TRIP™ initiative

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 5, Issue 25, 2004, Pages 1-7

  Andriole, Katherine P ^a   Morin, Richard L ^b   Arenson, Ronald L ^a   Carrino, John A ^c   Erickson, Bradley J ^d   Horii, Steven C ^e   Piraino, David W ^f   Reiner, Bruce I ^g   Seibert, J Anthony ^h   Siegel, Eliot L ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^f LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g BALTIMORE VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Large data sets; Radiological image interpretation paradigm

Indexed keywords

INTEGRATING THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE (IHE); LARGE DATA SETS; RADIOLOGICAL IMAGE INTERPRETATION PARADIGM; SOCIETY FOR COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN RADIOLOGY (SCAR);

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; DATA REDUCTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSIS; ERROR ANALYSIS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL IMAGING; QUALITY CONTROL;

RADIOLOGY;

EID: 19944428686     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.543741     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Tuddenham WJ. Visual problems of roentgen interpretation. N Y State J Medicine. 1960;60:1234-1238.
2. Hendee WR, Wells PN. Visual perception as an opportunity for radiologic research. Invesigative Radiology. 1989; 24:575-576.
3. Cooper LA. Understanding complex images: perspectives from visual cognition. Invesigative Radiology. 1991;26:765-768.
4. MacCormac ER. Images: cultural, perceptual and computational. Invesigative Radiology. 1989;24:331-333.
5. Vannier MW, Rickman D. Multispectral and color-aided displays. Invesigative Radiology. 1989;24:88-91.
6. Seltzer SE, Cavanagh P, Judy PF, Swensson RG, Scarff L, Monsky W. Enhanced displays of medical images: evaluation of the effectiveness of color, motion, and contour for detecting and localizing liver lesions. Academic Radiology. 1995;2:748-755.
7. Vizy KN. The roles of film in an increasingly computerized world. Invesigative Radiology. 1989;24:503-506.
8. Ackerman L. Toward automated image analysis: Future possibilities and historical perspective. Radiology Clinics of North America. 1986;24:79-85.
9. Picket RM. Person-machine systems for image-based diagnosis. Invesigative Radiology. 1988;23:394-395.
10. Hemmy DC, Sonneveld FW, Lobregt S, Fukuta K. A decade of clinical three-dimensional imaging: A review. Part 1. Historical development. Invesigative Radiology. 1994;29:489-496.
11. Zonneveld FW, Fukuta K. A decade of clinical three-dimensional imaging: A review. Part 2: Clinical applications. Invesigative Radiology. 1994;29:574-589.
12. Zonneveld FW. A decade of clinical dimensional imaging: A review. Part 3: Image analysis and interaction, display options, and physical models. Invesigative Radiology. 1994;29:716-725.
13. Kundel HL. Medical image perception. Academic Radiology. 1995;2(suppl 2):S108-S110.
14. Burgess A. Image quality, the ideal observer, and human performance of radiologic decision tasks. Academic Radiology. 1995;2:522-526.
15. Wang J, Langer S. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems. Journal of Digital Imaging. 1997;10:158-168.
16. Krupinski EA, Kundel HL, Judy PF, Nodine CF. Key issues for image perception research. Radiology. 1998;209:611-612.
17. Krupinski EA. Importance of perception research in medical imaging. Radiation Medicine. 2000;18:329-334.
18. Krupinski EA, Radvany M, Levy M, et al. Enhanced visualization processing: effect on workflow. Academic Radiology. 2001;8:1127-1133.
19. Beard D. Designing a radiology work-station: a focus on navigation during the interpretation task. Journal of Digital Imaging. 1990;3:152-163.
20. Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL. The digital imaging workstation. Radiology. 1990;176:315-330.
21. Dwyer SJ III. Work station for soft copy reading. Applied Radiology. 1998; August.
22. Lee H, Frank MS, Rowberg AH, Choi HS, Kim Y. A new method for computed tomography image compression using adjacent slice data. Invesigative Radiology. 1993:28:678-685.
23. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology. 1998;206:599-607.