Adaptation to Complex Visual Patterns in Humans and Monkeys

Fitting the Mind to the World: Adaptation and After-Effects in High-Level Vision

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Leopold, David A ^a   Bondar, Igor ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b INSTITUTE OF HIGHER NERVOUS ACTIVITY AND NEUROPHYSIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Complex stimuli; Face processing; Humans and monkeys; Tilt aftereffect; Visual patterns; Visual system

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944394341     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198529699.003.0008     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Anstis, S.M. (1974). Size adaptation to visual texture and print: evidence for spatial frequency analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 87, 261-7.
2. Arnold, K., & Anstis, S.M. (1993). Properties of the visual channels that underlie adaptation to gradual change of luminance. Vision Research, 33, 47-54.
3. Bednar, J.A., & Mukkulainen, R. (2000). Tilt aftereffects in a self-organizing model of the primary visual cortex. Neural Computation, 12, 1721-40.
4. Blakemore, C., & Sutton, P. (1969). Size adaptation: a new aftereffect. Science, 166, 245-7.
5. Blanz, V., O'Toole, A.J., & Vetter, T. (2000). On the other side of the mean: the perception of dissimilarity in human faces. Perception, 29(8), 885-91.
6. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. Symposium on Interactive 3D Gaphics-Proceedings of SIGGRAPH'99 (pp. 187-94). New York: ACM Press.
7. Carandini, M. (2000). Visual cortex: fatigue and adaptation. Current Biology, 10, R605-R607.
8. Carandini, M., Movshon, A.J., & Ferster, D. (1998). Pattern adaptation and crossorientation interactions in the primary visual cortex. Neuropharmacology, 37, 501-11.
9. Cavanagh, P. (1989). Multiple analyses of orientation in the visual system. In D. Lam, & C. Gilbert (ed.), Neural Mechanisms of Visual Perception (pp. 261-80). Woodlands, TX:Portfolio Publishing.
10. Clifford, C.W.G., Wenderoth, P., & Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on some aftereffects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London-Series B:Biological Sciences, 267, 1705-10.
11. Coltheart, M. (1971). Visual feature-analyzers and aftereffects of tilt and curvature. Psychological Review, 78, 114-21.
12. Craik, K.J.W. (1940). Origin of visual afterimages. Nature, 145, 512.
13. Culham, J.C., Dukelow, S.P., Vilis, T., Hassard, F.A., Gati, J.S., Menon, R.S. et al. (1999). Recovery of fMRI activation in motion area MT following storage of the motion aftereffect. Journal of Neurophysiology, 81(1), 388-93.
14. Durgin, F.H. (2001). Texture contrast aftereffects are monocular; texture density aftereffects are binocular. Vision Research, 41, 2619-30.
15. Durgin, F.H., & Huk, A.C. (1997). Texture density aftereffects in the perception of artificial and natural textures. Vision Research, 37, 3273-82.
16. Fang, F., & He, S. (2004). Stabilized structure from motion without disparity induced disparity adaptation. Current Biology, 14, 247-51.
17. Frisby, J.P. (1979). Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
18. Gibson, J.J. (1933). Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16, 1-31.
19. Gibson, J.J., & Radner, M. (1937). Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines, i.quantitative studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 453-67.
20. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., & Gobbini, M.I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-33.
21. Howe, C.Q., & Purves, D. (2002). Range image statistics can explain the anomalous perception of length. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 13184-8.
22. Hubel, D.H., & Wiesel, T.N. (1968). Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. Journal of Physiology, 195, 215-43.
23. Huk, A.C., Ress, D., & Heeger, D.J. (2001). Neuronal basis of the motion aftereffect reconsidered. Neuron, 32, 161-72.
24. Ito, M., Tamura, H., Fujita, I., & Tanaka, K. (1995). Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, 218-26.
25. Joung, W., & Latimer, C. (2003). Tilt aftereffects generated by symmetrical dot patterns with two or four axes of symmetry. Spatial Vision, 16, 155-82.
26. Joung, W., van der Zwan, R., & Latimer, C. (2000). Tilt aftereffects generated by bilaterally symmetrical patterns. Spatial Vision, 13, 107-28.
27. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience. 17, 4302-11.
28. Kanwisher, N., Tong, F., & Nakayama, K. (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition, 68(1), B1-11.
29. Koehler, W., & Emery, D.A. (1947). Figural after-effects in the third dimension of visual space. American Journal of Psychology, 60, 159-201.
30. Koehler, W., & Wallach, H. (1944). Figural after-effects: an investigation of visual processes. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 88, 269-357.
31. Kohn, A., & Movshon, J.A. (2004). Adaptation changes the direction tuning of macaque MT neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 7(7), 764-72.
32. Kreiman, G., Koch, C., & Fried, I. (2000). Category-specific visual responses in the human medial temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 946-53.
33. Leopold, D.A., Bondar, I.V., Giese, M.A., & Logothetis, N.K. (2003). Prototype-referenced encoding of faces in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts, Program No. 590.7.
34. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
35. Logothetis, N.K., Guggenberger, H., Peled, S., & Pauls, J. (1999). Functional imaging of the monkey brain. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 555-62.
36. Maffei, L., Fiorentini, A., & Bisti, S. (1973). Neural correlate of perceptual adaptation to gratings. Science, 182, 1036-8.
37. McKay, D.M. (1964). Central adaptation in mechanisms of form vision. Nature, 203, 993-4.
38. Mitchell, D.E., & Muir, D.W. (1976). Does the tilt aftereffect occur in the oblique meridian? Vision Research, 16, 609-13.
39. Morant, R.B., & Harris, J.R. (1965). Two different aftereffects of exposure to visual tilts. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 218-26.
40. Movshon, J.A., & Lennie, P. (1979). Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurons. Nature, 278, 850-2.
41. Nundy, S., Lotto, B., Coppola, D., Shimpi, A., & Purves, D. (2000). Why are angles misperceived? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 5592-7.
42. Paradiso, M.A., Shimojo, S., & Nakayama, K. (1989). Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization. Vision Research, 29(9), 1205-13.
43. Pascalis, O., Petit, O., Kim, J.H., & Campbell, R. (2000). Picture perception in primates: the case of face perception. In J. Fagot (ed.), Picture Perception in Animals (pp. 263-94). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.
44. Perrett, D.I., Rolls, E.T., & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 47, 329-42.
45. Petersik, J.T., Shepard, A., & Malsch, R. (1984). A three-dimensional motion aftereffect produced by prolonged adaptation to a rotation simulation. Perception, 13, 489-97.
46. Posner, M.I., & Keele, S.W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353-63.
47. Purves, D., & Lotto, R.B. (2003). Why We See What We Do: An Empirical Theory of Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
48. Regan, D., & Hamstra, S.J. (1992). Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research, 32, 1845-64.
49. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T.L., Clifford, C.W.G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-66.
50. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., & Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures:Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-97.
51. Rhodes, G., & Tremewan, T. (1994). Understanding face recognition: Caricature effects, inversion, and the homogeneity problem. Visual Cognition, 1(2/3), 275-311.
52. Roberts, J.E. (1984). Pigeons experience orientation-contingent chromatic aftereffects. Perception and Psychophysics, 36, 309-14.
53. Sary, G., Vogels, R., & Orban, G.A. (1993). Cue-invariant shape selectivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. Science, 260, 995-7.
54. Scott, T.R., & Powell, D.A. (1963). Measure of a visual motion aftereffect in the rhesus monkey. Science, 140, 57-9.
55. Shimojo., S., Kamitani, Y., & Nishida, S. (2001). Afterimage of perceptually filled-in surface. Science, 293(5535), 1677-80.
56. Smith, A., & Over, R. (1975). Tilt aftereffects with subjective contours. Nature, 257, 581-2.
57. Suzuki, S. (2001). Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a highlevel aftereffect for convexity? Vision Research, 41, 3883-902.
58. Suzuki, S., & Grabowecky, M. (2003). Attention during adaptation weakens negative afterimages. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception & Performance, 29, 793-807.
59. Suzuki, S., & Cavanagh, P. (1998). A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24(5), 1315-41.
60. Taylor, J.G., Schmitz, N., Ziemons, K., Grosse-Ruyken, M.L., Gruber, O., Mueller-Gaertner, H.W. et al. (2000). The network of brain areas involved in the motion aftereffect. Neuroimage, 11, 257-70.
61. Tolias, A.S., Smirnakis, S.M., Augath, M.A., Trinath, T., & Logothetis, N.K. (2001). Motion processing in the macaque: revisited with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 8594-601.
62. Tootell, R.B., Reppas, J.B., Dale, A.M., Look, R.B., Sereno, M.I., Malach, R., Brady, T.J. et al. (1995). Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature, 375, 139-41.
63. Tsao, D.Y., Freiwald, W.A., Knutsen, T.A., Mandeville, J.B., & Tootell, R.B. (2003). Faces and objects in macaque cerebral cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 989-95.
64. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
65. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986). The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15(5), 525-35.
66. van der Smagt, M.J., Verstraten, F.A., Vaessen, E.B., van Londen, T., & van de Grind, W.A. (1999). Motion aftereffect of combined first-order and second-order motion. Perception, 28, 1397-411.
67. van der Zwan, R., & Wenderoth, P. (1995). Mechanisms of purely subjective contour tilt aftereffects. Vision Research, 35, 2547-57.
68. Vetter, T., & Troje, N.F. (1997). Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis. Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics & Image Science, 14, 2152-61.
69. von der Heydt, R., & Peterhans, E. (1989). Mechanisms of contour perception in monkey visual cortex. I. Lines of pattern discontinuity. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 1731-48.
70. Wade, N. (1999). A Natural History of Vision. (2nd ed.) Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
71. Wade, N.J. (1978). Why do patterned afterimages fluctuate in visibility? Psychological Bulletin, 85, 338-52.
72. Watson, T.L., & Clifford, C.W.G. (2003). Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception, 32, 1109-16.
73. Webster, M.A., Raping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557-61.
74. Webster, M.A., & MacLin, O.H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-53.
75. Wenderoth, P., & Johnstone, S. (1988). The different mechanisms of the direct and indirect tilt illusions. Vision Research, 28, 301-12.
76. Wenderoth, P., & Smith, S. (1999). Neural substrates of the tilt illusion. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Ophthalmology, 27, 271-4.
77. Wenderoth, P., & van der Zwan, R. (1989). The effects of exposure duration and surrounding frames on direct and indirect tilt aftereffects and illusions. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 338-44.
78. Wohlgemuth, A. (1911). On the aftereffect of seen movement. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, 1, 1-117.
79. Wolfe, J.M. (1984). Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects. Vision Research, 24, 1959-64.
80. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-5.
81. Zhao, L., & Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research, 41, 2979-94.