Potency and risk assessment of a skin-sensitizing disperse dye using the local lymph node assay

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 268-272

  Betts, Catherine J ^a   Dearman, Rebecca J ^a   Kimber, Ian ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^b  

^a JEALOTT S HILL INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Dinitrochlorobenzene; Disperse Blue 106; Local lymph node assay; Risk assessment; Skin sensitization potency

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; ANTHRAQUINONE DERIVATIVE; CONTACT ALLERGEN; DISPERSE BLUE 106; DYE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPHOCYTE PROLIFERATION; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PARAMETER; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN PENETRATION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; TECHNIQUE;

ALLERGENS; ANIMALS; AZO COMPOUNDS; COLORING AGENTS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DESENSITIZATION, IMMUNOLOGIC; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; LYMPH NODES; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; PATCH TESTS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 19944378115     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00578.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Hatch K L, Maibach H I. Textile dye allergic contact dermatitis prevalence. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 187-195.
2. Hatch K L, Motschi H, Maibach H I. Identifying the source of textile dye allergic contact dermatitis - a guideline. Exog Dermatol 2003: 2: 240-245.
3. Hatch K L, Motschi H, Maibach H I. Disperse dyes in fabrics of patients patch-test-positive to disperse dyes. Am J Contact Dermat 2003: 14: 205-212.
4. Hatch K L, Motschi H, Maibach H I. Textile-dye colored textile allergic contact dermatitis. Exog Dermatol 2003: 2: 206-209.
5. Mota F, Silva E, Varela P, Azenha A, Massa A. An outbreak of occupational textile dye dermatitis from disperse blue 106. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 43: 235-236.
6. Pratt M, Taraska V. Disperse blue dyes 106 and 124 are common causes of textile dermatitis and should serve as screening allergens for this condition. Am J Contact Dermat 2000: 11: 30-41.
7. Komericki P, Aberer W, Arbab E, Kovacevic Z, Kranke B. Pigmented purpuric contact dermatitis from disperse blue 106 and 124 dyes. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001: 45: 454.
8. Uter W, Geier J, Lessmann H, Hausen B M for the IVDK and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact allergy to disperse blue 106 and disperse blue 124 in German and Austrian patients, 1995-99. Contact Dermatitis 2001: 44: 173-177.
9. Kimber I, Dearman R J, Basketter D A, Ryan C A, Gerberick G F. The local lymph node assay, past, present and future. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 47: 315-328.
10. Kimber I, Basketter D A. Contact sensitization: a new approach to risk assessment. Human Ecol Risk Assess 1997: 3: 385-395.
11. Basketter D A, Dearman R J, Hilton J, Kimber I. Dinitrohalobenzenes: evaluation of relative skin sensitization potential using the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 97-100.
12. Kimber I, Basketter D A, Berthold K et al. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. Toxicol Sci 2001: 59: 198-208.
13. Kimber I, Basketter D A, Butler M et al. Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. Food Chem Toxicol 2003: 41: 1799-1809.
14. Basketter D A, Blaikie L, Dearman R J et al. Use of the local lymph node assay for estimation of relative contact allergenic potency. Contact Dermatitis 2000: 42: 344-348.
15. Gerberick G F, Robinson M K, Ryan C A, Dearman R J, Kimber I, Basketter D A, Wright Z, Marks J G. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am J Contact Dermal 2001: 12: 156-161.
16. Kimber I, Basketter D A. The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. Food Chem Toxicol 1992: 30: 165-169.
17. Basketter D A, Lea L J, Dickens A, Briggs D, Pate I, Dearman R J, Kimber I. A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose-responses. J Appl Toxicol 1999: 19: 261-266.
18. Friedmann P S. Clinical aspects of allergic contact dermatitis. In: Immunotoxicology and Immunopharmacology, 2nd edition, Dean J H, Luster M I, Munson A E, Kimber I (eds): New York, Raven Press, 1994: 589-616.
19. Basketter D A, Gilmour N J, Briggs D, Ullmann L G, Gerberick G F, Ryan C A, Dearman R J, Kimber I. Utility of historical vehicle-control data in the interpretation of the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 2004: 49: 37-41.
20. Kimber I, Hilton J, Dearman R J et al. Assessment of the skin sensitizing potential of topical medicaments using the local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation. J Toxicol Environ Health 1999: 53: 563-579.
21. Lea L J, Warbrick E V, Dearman R J, Kimber I, Basketter D A. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay. Am J Contact Dermat 1999: 10: 213-218.
22. Loveless S E, Ladies G S, Gerberick G F et al. Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. Toxicology 1996: 108: 141-152.
23. Kimber I, Hilton J, Dearman R J et al. An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and a comparison of modified procedures. Toxicology 1995: 103: 63-73.
24. Boukham M P, Maibach H I. Thresholds in contact sensitization: immunologic mechanisms and experimental evidence in humans - an overview. Food Chem Toxicol 2001: 39: 1125-1134.
25. Kimber I, Dearman R J. What makes a chemical an allergen. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2003: 90: 28-31.
26. Dearman R J, Kimber I. Factors influencing the induction phase of skin sensitization. Am J Contact Dermal 2003: 14: 188-194.
27. Kimber I, Basketter D A, Gerberick G F, Dearman R J. Allergic contact dermatitis. Int Immunopharmacol 2002: 2: 201-211.
28. Kimber I, Dearman R J. Allergic contact dermatitis: the cellular effectors. Contact Dermatitis 2002: 46: 1-5.
29. Kimber I, Dearman R J. Investigation of lymph node cell proliferation as a possible immunological correlate of contact sensitising potential. Food Chem Toxicol 1991: 29: 125-129.
30. Kimber I, Gerberick G F, Basketter D A. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. Food Chem Toxicol 1999: 37: 553-560.
31. Friedmann P S. The immunology of allergic contact dermatitis: the DNCB story. Adv Dermatol 1990: 5: 175-196.