Stochastic inversion of electrical resistivity changes using a Markov Chain Monte Carlo approach

Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 1-18

  Ramirez, A L ^a   Nitao, J J ^a   Hanley, W G ^a   Aines, R ^a   Glaser, R E ^a   Sengupta, S K ^a   Dyer, K M ^a   Hickling, T L ^a   Daily, W D ^a  

^a LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROCESSING; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEY;

EID: 19844364265     PISSN: 21699313     EISSN: 21699356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2004JB003449     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Andersen, K. E., S. P. Brooks, and M. B. Hansen (2001a), Bayesian inversion of geoelectrical resistivity data, Res. Rep. R-01-2016, Dep. of Math. Sci., Aalborg Univ., Aalborg, Denmark.
2. Andersen, K., S. Brooks, and M. Hansen (2001b), A Bayesian approach to crack detection in electrically conducting media, Inverse Problems, 17, 121-136.
3. Barnett, B., G. Gee, and M. Sweeney (2002), Results of tank teak detection demonstration using geophysical techniques at the Mock Tank test site, Rep. PNNL-13818, Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab., Richland, Wash.
4. Barnett, D., et al. (2003), Results of performance evaluation testing of electrical leak-detection methods at the Hanford Site mock tank-FY 2002-2003, Rep. PNNL-14192, Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab., Richland, Wash.
5. Binley, A., S. Henry-Poulter, and B. Shaw (1996), Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography, Water Resour. Res., 32(4), 763-769.
6. Brooks, S. P., and A. Gelman (1998), General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 7 (4), 434-455.
7. Cowles, M. K., and B. C. Carlin (1996), Markov Chain Monte Carlo convergence diagnostics: A comparative review, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 91, 883-904.
8. Daily, W., and A. Ramirez (2000), Electrical imaging of engineered hydraulic barriers, Geophysics, 65, 83-94.
9. Daily, W., A. Ramirez, D. LaBrecque, and J. Nitao (1992), Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement, Water Resour. Res., 28(5), 1429-1442.
10. Daily, W. D., W. Lin, and T. Buscheck (1987), Hydrological properties of Topopah Spring Tuff: Laboratory measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 92 , 7854-7864.
11. Ellis, R. G., and D. W. Oldenburg (1994), The pole-pole 3-D DC-resistivity inverse problem: A conjugate gradient approach, Geophys. J. Int., 119, 111-119.
12. Gee, G., and A. Ward (2001), Vadose zone transport field study: Status report, Rep. PNNL-13679, Pac. Northwest Natl. Lab., Richland, Wash.
13. Gelman, A., and D. B. Rubin (1992), Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Stat. Sci., 7, 457-511.
14. Glaser, R. (2003), Stochastic engine convergence diagnostics, Rep. UCRL-ID-155140, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif.
15. Jain, A., and R. Dubes (1988), Algorithms for Clustering Data, 320 pp., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, N. J.
16. Kaipio, J., V. Kolehmainen, E. Somersalo, and M. Vauhkonen (2000), Statistical inversion and Monte Carlo sampling in electrical impedance tomography, Inverse Problems, 16, 1487-1522.
17. Kemna, A., A. Binley, A. Ramirez, and W. Daily (2000), Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications, Chem. Eng. J., 77(1-2), 11-18.
18. LaBrecque, D. J., M. Miletto, W. D. Daily, A. L. Ramirez, and E. Owen (1996), The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data, Geophysics, 61, 538-548.
19. LaBrecque, D., G. Morelli, W. Daily, A. Ramirez, and P. Lundegard (1999), Occam's inversion of 3D electrical resistivity tomography, in Three-Dimensional Eelectromagnetics, edited by M. Oristaglio, B. Spies, and M. R. Cooper, pp. 575-590, Soc. of Explor. Geophys., Tulsa, Okla.
20. Metropolis, N., A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller, and E. Teller (1953), Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines, J. Chem. Phys., 1(6), 1087-1092.
21. Morelli, G., and D. J. LaBrecque (1996), Advances in ERT modeling, Eur. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 1, 171-186.
22. Mosegaard, K., and M. Sambridge (2002), Monte Carlo analysis of inverse problems, Inverse Problems, 18, R29-R54.
23. Mosegaard, K., and A. Tarantola (1995), Monte Carlo sampling of solutions to inverse problems, J. Geophys. Res., 100(B7), 12,431-12,447.
24. Pao, Y. H. (1989), Adaptive Pattern Recognition and Neural Networks , Addison-Wesley, Boston, Mass.
25. Park, S. K. (1998), Fluid migration in the vadose zone from 3D inversion of resistivity monitoring data, Geophysics, 63, 41-51.
26. Park, S. K., and G. P. Van (1991), Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes, Geophysics, 56 , 951-960.
27. Raftery, A., and S. Lewis (1992a), How many iterations in the Gibbs Sampler?, in Bayesian Statistics 4, edited by J. M. Bernardo et al., pp. 763-773, Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
28. Raftery, A., and S. Lewis (1992b), The number of iterations, convergence diagnostics, and generic Metropolis algorithms, technical report, Dep. of Stat., Univ. of Washington, Seattle.
29. Ramirez, A., R. Newmark, and W. Daily (2003), Monitoring carbon dioxide floods using electrical resistance tomography (ERT): Sensitivity studies, J. Environ. Eng. Geophys., 8(3), 187-208.
30. Robert, C. (1995), Convergence control methods for Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms, Stat. Sci., 10(3), 231-253.
31. Robert, C. P., T. Ryden, and D. M. Titterington (1999), Convergence controls for MCMC algotithms, with applications to hidden Markov chains, J. Stat. Comput. Simulation, 64, 327-355.
32. Sasaki, Y. (1994), 3-D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method, Geophysics, 59, 1839-1848.
33. Sengupta, S., and A. Ramirez (2003), Exploratory global inference from posterior image samples in a Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation experiment: A high-dimensional data clustering approach with extensions to categorical data, Rep. UCRL-JRNL-200985, Lawrence Livermore Natl. Lab., Livermore, Calif.
34. Shima, H. (1992), 2-D and 3-D resistivity image reconstruction using cross-hole data, Geophysics, 57, 1270-1281.
35. Slater, L., A. Binley, W. Daily, and R. Johnson (2000), Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection, J. Appl. Geophys., 44, 85-102.
36. Ward, A., and G. Gee (2001), Vadose zone transport field study: FY 2001 test plan, Rep. PNNL-13451, rev. 1, Pacific Northwest Natl. Lab., Richland, Wash.
37. Yang, X., and D. LaBrecque (1999), Comparison between Stochastic and Occam's inversion of 3-D ERT data, paper presented at Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Environ. and Eng. Geophys. Soc., Oakland, Calif., 14-18 March.
38. Yeh, T.-C. J., S. Liu, R. J. Glass, K. Baker, J. R. Brainard, D. Alumbaugh, and D. LaBrecque (2002), A geostatistically based inverse model for electrical resistivity surveys and its applications to vadose zone hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 38(12), 1278, doi:10.1029/ 2001WR001204.
39. Zhang, J., R. L. Mackie, and T. Madden (1995), 3-D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients, Geophysics, 60, 1313-1325.