A sustainable solution for riparian management

USDA Forest Service - General Technical Report PNW

Volumn , Issue 626, 2005, Pages 54-62

  Zobrist, Kevin W ^a   Gehringer, Kevin R ^a   Lippke, Bruce R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RIPARIAN FOREST;

NORTH AMERICA; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

RIPARIA;

EID: 19744376089     PISSN: 08874840     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Acker, S.A.; Sabin, T.E.; Ganio, L.M.; McKee, W.A. 1998. Development of old-growth structure and timber volume growth trends in maturing Douglas-fir stands. Forest Ecology and Management. 104 (1/3): 265-280.
2. Bailey, J.D.; Tappeiner, J.C. 1998. Effects of thinning on structural development in 40- to 100-year-old Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon. Forest Ecology and Management. 108: 99-113.
3. Carey, A.B.; Kershner, J.; Biswell, B.; Dominguez de Toledo, L. 1999a. Ecological scale and forest development: squirrels, dietary fungi, and vascular plants in managed and unmanaged forests. Wildlife Monographs. 142: 1-71.
4. Carey, A.B.; Lippke, B.R.; Sessions, J. 1999b. Intentional systems management: managing forests for biodiversity. Journal of Sustainable Forestry. 9(3/4): 83-125.
5. Cross, J. 2002. Measuring the impact of harvest intensity on riparian forest functionality in terms of shade production and large woody debris recruitment potential: two models. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. 76 p. M.S. thesis.
6. Drew, T.J.; Flewelling, J.W. 1979. Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations. Forest Science. 25: 518-532.
7. Faustmann, M. 1995. Calculation of the value which forest land and immature stands possess for forestry. Journal of Forest Economics. 1(1): 7-44. Reprint of translation in Institute Paper 42, Commonwealth Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, 1968. First published in Allgemeine Forst- und Jagd-Zeitung 15, 1849.
8. Forests and Fish Report. 1999. http://www.dnr.wa.gov/ forestpractices/rules/forestsandfish.pdf. (June 2003).
9. Garman, S.L.; Cissel, J.H.; Mayo, J.H. 2003. Accelerating development of late-successional conditions in young managed Douglas-fir stands: a simulation study. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-557. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 57 p.
10. Gehringer, K.R. [In press]. A nonparametric method for defining and using biologically based targets in forest management. In: Bevers, M.; Barrett, T.M., comps. Proceedings, systems analysis in forest resources '03. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.
11. King, J.E. 1966. Site index curves for Douglas-fir in the Pacific Northwest. Weyerhaeuser Forestry Paper 8. Centralia, WA: Weyerhaeuser Forestry Research Center. 49 p.
12. Lippke, B.R.; Sessions, J.; Carey, A.B. 1996. Economic analysis of forest landscape management alternatives: final report of the working group on the economic analysis of forest landscape management alternatives for the Washington Forest Landscape Management Project. Special Paper 21. Seattle, WA: CINTRAFOR, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. 157 p.
13. MacLean, C.D.; Bolsinger, C.L. 1997. Urban expansion in the forests of the Puget Sound region. Resour. Bull. PNW-RB-225. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 17 p.
14. Muir, P.S.; Mattingly, R.L.; Tappeiner,J.C. [et al.]. 2002. Managing for biodiversity in young Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon. Biological Science Report USGS/BRD/BSR-2002-0006. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center. 76 p.
15. Oneil, E. 2003. Impacts of the forest and fish rules on small forest landowners in eastern Washington: some key consequences from riparian zone case study analysis. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. 124 p. M.S. thesis.
16. Perez-Garcia, J.M.; Edelson, J.; Zobrist, K. 2001. New proposed forest practices rules small business economic impact statement. Olympia, WA: Washington State Department of Natural Resources. 38 p.
17. Poage, N.J.; Tappeiner, J.C. 2002. Long-term patterns of diameter and basal area growth of old-growth Douglas-fir trees in western Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 32(7): 1232-1243.
18. Tappeiner, J.C.; Huffman, D.; Marshall, D. [et al.]. 1997. Density, ages, and growth rates in old-growth and young-growth forests in coastal Oregon. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 638-648.
19. Washington Department of Natural Resources [WADNR]. 1998. Our changing nature: natural resource trends in Washington State. Olympia, WA. 75 p.
20. Washington Department of Revenue [WADOR]. 2002. Comparing the value of "Forests and Fish" leave-trees with the forest excise tax credit. Report to the Legislature. http://dor.wa.gov/Docs/Pubs/ ForestTax/SalmonTax.doc. (August 2004).
21. Wilson, J.S.; Oliver, C.D. 2000. Stability and density management in Douglas-fir plantations. Canadian Journal of Forest Resources. 30: 910-920.
22. Zobrist, K. 2003. Economic impacts of the forests and fish rules on small, NIPF landowners: ten western Washington case studies. RTI Working Paper 1, Revised. Seattle, WA: Rural Technology Initiative, College of Forest Resources, University of Washington. 23 p.
23. Zobrist, K.; Lippke, B.R. 2003. Case studies examining the economic impacts of new forest practices regulations on NIPF landowners. In: Teeter, L.; Cashore, B.; Zhang, D., eds. Forest policy for private forestry: global and regional challenges. Wallingford, United Kingdom: CABI Publishing. Chapter 19.