Another way to approach zero entropy for a finite system of atoms

Physical Review A - Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Weiss, D S ^a   Vala, J ^b   Thapliyal, A V ^c   Myrgren, S ^b   Vazirani, U ^c   Whaley, K B ^b  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRYSTAL LATTICES; ERROR ANALYSIS; LASER BEAMS; LIGHT POLARIZATION; LIGHT SCATTERING; MICROWAVES; PHOTONS; QUANTUM THEORY; RESONANCE; SPONTANEOUS EMISSION;

LASER-COOLED ATOMS; PHOTON-ASSISTED COLLISION; QUANTUM COMPUTING;

LATTICE VIBRATIONS;

EID: 19744372457     PISSN: 10502947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.040302     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. M.T. DePue et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2262 (1999).
2. D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108 (1998).
3. M. Greiner et al., Nature (London) 415, 39 (2002).
4. P. Rabl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 110403 (2003).
5. S. Peil et al., Phys. Rev. A 67, 051603 (2003).
6. J.C. Maxwell, Theory of Heat (Longmans, Green, & Co., London, 1875).
7. L. Szilard, Z. Phys. 53, 840 (1929).
8. H.S. Leff and A.F. Rex, Maxwell's Demon 2. Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2003).
9. H.F. Hess, Phys. Rev. B 34, 3476 (1986).
10. M.H. Anderson et al., Science 269,5221 (1995).
11. M. Olshanii and D. Weiss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 090404 (2002).
12. R. Scheunemann et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 051801 (2000).
13. S.L. Winoto et al., Phys. Rev. A 59, R19 (1999).
14. E.L. Raab et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2631 (1987).
15. N. Schlosser et al., Nature (London) 411, 1024 (2001).
16. S. Chu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 48 (1985).
17. A.J. Kerman et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 439 (2000).
18. D.-J. Han et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 724 (2000).
19. G.K. Brennen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1060 (1999).
20. D. Jaksch et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2208 (2000).
21. O. Mandel et al., e-print cond-mat/0301169 (2003) (unpublished).
22. The bias magnetic-field direction must change with the axis of required motion, which can be done faster than the shift operation.
23. R. Kosloff, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 145 (1994).
24. J. Vala et al., e-print quant-ph/0307085 (2003) (unpublished).
25. The quantization axis of states A and B can be defined by a small bias magnetic field along the site addressing beam, the same direction for all atoms.
26. D. Mohl et al., Phys. Rep. 58, 73 (1980).
27. M.G. Raizen et al., Phys. Rev. A 58, 4757 (1998).
28. D. Ivanov, S. Wallentowitz, and I.A. Walmsley, Phys. Rev. A 67, 061401 (R) (2003).