Erratum: Expression of concern: “Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores” [EJOG 120(2) (2005) 164–169, (S0301211504004865), (10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.08.013)];Induction of labor with three different techniques at 41 weeks of gestation or spontaneous follow-up until 42 weeks in women with definitely unfavorable cervical scores

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 120, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 164-169

  Gelisen, O ^a   Caliskan, E ^a   Dilbaz, S ^a   Ozdas, E ^a   Dilbaz, B ^a   Haberal, A ^a  

^a SSK Ankara Maternity and Women's Health Teaching Hospital   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Foley catheter; Follow up; Misoprostol; Oxytocin; Post term pregnancy

Indexed keywords

MISOPROSTOL; OXYTOCIN;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ADULT; AMNION FLUID ANALYSIS; ARTERIAL PH; ARTICLE; BALLOON CATHETER; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; FETUS DEATH; FETUS HEART RATE; FOLLOW UP; GESTATION PERIOD; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; LABOR INDUCTION; MACROSOMIA; MECONIUM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; UMBILICAL ARTERY;

EID: 19744365652     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.008     Document Type: Erratum

References (20)

1. ACOG. Practice patterns: management of postterm pregnancy, number 6, October 1997. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1997; 60: 86-91.
2. I. Ingemarsson, and K. Kallen Stillbirths and rate of neonatal deaths in 76761 postterm pregnancies in Sweden. 1982-1991: a register study Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76 1997 658 662
3. J.M. Alexander, D.D. McIntire, and K.J. Leveno Forty weeks and beyond: pregnancy outcomes by week of gestation Obstet Gynecol 96 2000 291 294
4. P. Crowley Interventions to Prevent or Improve Outcome of Labor at or Beyond Term 2001 The Cochrane Library Oxford Update Software Issue 1
5. C.L. Roberts, L. Taylor, and D. Henderson-Smart Trends in births at and beyond term: evidence of change BJOG 106 1999 937 942
6. E. Parry, D. Parry, and N. Pattison Induction of labor for postterm pregnancy: an observational study Aust N Z J Obstet Gynecol 38 1998 275 280
7. S.T. Seyb, R.J. Berka, M.L. Socol, and S.L. Dooley Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women Obstet Gynecol 94 1999 600 607
8. A.S. Maslow, and A.L. Sweeny Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term Obstet Gynecol 95 2000 917 922
9. S.M. Menticoglou, and P.F. Hall Routine induction of labour at 41 weeks' gestation: nonsensus consensus BJOG 109 2002 485 491
10. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor with misoprostol. ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. Washington, DC: ACOG; 1999.
11. P.S. Ramsey, P.L. Ogburn, O.Y. Harris, R.H. Heise, and K.D. Ramin Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction Am J Obstet Gynecol 182 2000 1616 1619
12. F.W. Kubli, E.H. Hon, A.F. Khazin, and H. Takemura Observations on heart rate on pH in human fetus during labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 104 1969 1190 1206
13. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Umbilical artery blood acid-base analysis. ACOG Technical Bulletin No.: 216. Washington: The College; 1995.
14. A.L. Bernal Overview of current research in partrution Exp Physiol 86 2001 213 222
15. M. Mongelli, M. Wilcox, and J. Gardosi Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain measurement dates Am J Obstet Gynecol 17 1996 278 281
16. J.M. Alexander, D.D. McIntire, and K.J. Leveno Prolonged pregnancy: induction of labor and cesarean births Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 911 915
17. L. Sanchez-Ramos, A.M. Kaunitz, R.L. Wears, I. Delke, and F.L. Gaudier Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction: a meta analysis Obstet Gynecol 89 1997 633 642
18. A.C. Sciscione, L. Nguyen, J. Manley, M. Pollock, B. Maas, and G. Colmorgen A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening Obstet Gynecol 97 2001 603 607
19. J.H. Chung, W.H. Huang, P.J. Rumney, T.J. Garite, and M.P. Nageotte A prospective randomized controlled trial that compared misoprostol, Foley catheter and combination misoprostol-Foley catheter for labor induction Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 2003 1031 1035
20. M.M. Meydanli, E. Caliskan, and A. Haberal Prediction of adverse outcome associated with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction Eur J Gynecol Obstet Reprod Biol 110 2003 143 148