Detection of non-standard EMG profiles in walking

Gait and Posture

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 171-177

  Hof, A L ^a,b   Elzinga, H ^b   Grimmius, W ^b   Halbertsma, J P K ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Electromyogram; Human walking; Intersubject variation; Speed dependence

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEG MUSCLE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VELOCITY; WALKING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; LEG; PHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; WALKING;

EID: 19644389750     PISSN: 09666362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.01.015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hof AL, Elzinga H, Grimmius W, Halbertsma JPK. Speed dependency of averaged EMG profiles in walking. Gait Posture 2002;16:78-86.
2. Van der Glas HW, Lobbezoo F, Van der Bilt A, Bosman F. Influence of the thickness of soft tissues overlying human masseter and temporalis muscles on the electromyographic maximal voluntary contraction level. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:87-95.
3. Farina D, Cescon C, Merletti R. Influence of anatomical, physical, and detection-system parameters on surface EMG. Biol Cybernet 2002;86:445-56.
4. Hof AL, Berg Jw van den, Linearity between the weighted sum of the EMGs of the human triceps surae and the total torque. J Biomech 1977;10:529-539.
5. Perotto A. Anatomical guide for the electromyographer. In: The limbs and the trunk. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1994.
6. Freriks B, Hermens H, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. The recommendations for sensors and sensor placement procedures for surface electromyography. In: Hermens HJ, editor. European recommendations for surface electromyography. Enschede: Roessingh Research and Development, 1999. p. 15-53.
7. Winter DA. The biomechanics and motor control of human gait. 2nd ed. Waterloo, Canada: University of Waterloo Press, 1991.
8. Kadaba MP, Wootten ME, Gainey J, Cochran GVB. Repeatability of phasic muscle activity: performance of surface and intramuscular wire electrodes in gait analysis. J Orthop Res 1985;3:350-9.
9. Winter DA, Yack HJ. EMG profiles during normal human walking: stride to stride and inter-subject variability. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1987;67:402-11.
10. Kleissen R, Litjens M, Baten C, Harlaar J, Hof A. Consistency of surface EMG patterns obtained during gait in three laboratories using standardized measurement technique. Gait Posture 1997;6: 200-9.
11. Boerboom AL, Hof AL, Halbertsma JPK, van Raaij JJAM, Schenk W, Diercks RL, et al. Atypical hamstrings electromyographic activity as a compensatory mechanism in anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001;9:211-6.
12. Hershler C, Milner M. An optimality criterion for processing electromyographic (EMG) signals related to human locomotion. IEEE Trans BME 1978;25:412-20.
13. Erni T, Colombo G. Locomotor training in paraplegic patients: a new approach to assess changes in leg muscle EMG patterns. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1998;109:135-9.
14. Nene A, Byrne C, Hermens H. Is rectus femoris really a part of quadriceps? Assessment of rectus femoris function during gait in able-bodied adults. Gait Posture, in press.
15. Kuo A. Stabilization of lateral motion in passive dynamic walking. Int J Robot Res 1999;18:917-30.
16. Hof AL, Pijlman J, Otten E. Control of lateral balance in walking. Simulations and experiments on an instrumented treadmill. In: Duysens J, Smits-Engelsman B, Kingma H, editors. Proceedings of the ISPG 2001, Maastricht, 2001. p. 853-7.