Chirality in quantum computation with spin cluster qubits

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 93, Issue 12, 2004, Pages

  Scarola, V W ^a   Park, K ^a   Das Sarma, S ^a  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COULOMB BLOCKADE; ELECTRON TUNNELING; FAULT TOLERANT COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FERMIONS; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC FLUX; MATRIX ALGEBRA; VECTORS;

CHIRALITY; DIAGONALIZATION; QUANTUM COMPUTATION; SPIN CLUSTER QUBITS;

SEMICONDUCTOR QUANTUM DOTS;

EID: 19644363005     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.120503     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. D. Loss and D. P. DiVincenzo, Phys. Rev. A 57, 120 (1998).
2. B. E. Kane, Nature (London) 393, 133 (1998).
3. X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062301 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 64, 042312 (2001).
4. X. Hu and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. A 61, 062301 (2000); Phys. Rev. A 64, 042312 (2001).
5. R. Vrijen et al., Phys. Rev. A 62, 012306 (2000).
6. A.V. Khaetskii and Y.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125316 (2001); R. de Sousa and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 67, 033301 (2003).
7. A.V. Khaetskii and Y.V. Nazarov, Phys. Rev. B 64, 125316 (2001); R. de Sousa and S. Das Sarma, Phys. Rev. B 67, 033301 (2003).
8. X. Hu et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 918 (2001).
9. D. P. DiVincenzo et al., Nature (London) 408, 339 (2000).
10. S. C. Benjamin and S. Bose, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 247901 (2003).
11. J. Levy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 147902 (2002).
12. F. Meier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047901 (2003); Phys. Rev. B 68, 134417 (2003).
13. F. Meier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 047901 (2003); Phys. Rev. B 68, 134417 (2003).
14. D. Bacon et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1758 (2000).
15. L. Viola et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3520 (2000).
16. J. Kempe et al., Phys. Rev. A 63, 042307 (2001).
17. D. A. Lidar et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 2594 (1998).
18. E. Knill et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2525 (2000).
19. M. Takahashi, J. Phys. C 10, 1289 (1977); A. H. MacDonald et al., Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988).
20. M. Takahashi, J. Phys. C 10, 1289 (1977); A. H. MacDonald et al., Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988).
21. D. S. Rokhsar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1506 (1990).
22. D. Sen and R. Chitra, Phys. Rev. B 51, 1922 (1995).
23. X. G. Wen et al., Phys. Rev. B 39, 11413 (1989).
24. A. Mizel and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 077903 (2004).
25. M. S. Byrd and D. A. Lidar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 047901 (2002).
26. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 47, 446 (1928); C. G. Darwin, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. Math. Phys. Sci. 27, 86 (1930).
27. V. Fock, Z. Phys. 47, 446 (1928); C. G. Darwin, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. Math. Phys. Sci. 27, 86 (1930).
28. G. Burkard et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 2070 (1999).
29. P. G. J. van Dongen, Phys. Rev. B 49, 7904 (1994).
30. The effective enclosed area includes a correction due to the parabolic confinement V.W. Scarola and S. Das Sarma (to be published).
31. M.V. Berry, Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. A 392, 45 (1984).
32. Y. Lyanda-Geller et al., Phys. Rev. B 63, 184426 (2001).