External benefits of preserving agricultural land: Taiwan's rice fields

Social Science Journal

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 285-293

  Chang, Koyin ^a   Ying, Yung Hsiang ^b  

^a MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19544389618     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. K. Arrow R. Solow E. Leamer P. Portney R. Randner & H. Schuman Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation Federal Register 58 10 1993 4601-4614
2. K.J. Boyle & R.C. Bishop Valuing wildlife in benefit-cost analysis: A case study involving endangered species Water Resources Research 25 3 1987 943-950
3. L. Drake The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape European Review of Agricultural Economics 19 3 1992 351-364
4. A. Fleischer & Y. Tsur Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape European Review of Agricultural Economics 27 3 2000 385-398
5. W.M. Hanemann Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses American Journal of Agriculture Economics 66 3 1984 332-341
6. M. Hanemann J. Loomis & B. Kanninen Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 4 1991 1255-1263
7. R.C. Mitchell & R.T. Carson Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method 1989 Resources for the Future Washington, DC
8. M.L. Messonnier J.C. Bergstrom M. Christopher R.J. Cornwell B.L. Teasley & K. Cordell Survey response-related biases in contingent valuation: Concepts, remedies, and empirical application to valuing aquatic plant management American Journal Agricultural Economics 82 2 2000 438-450
9. G.J. Pruckner Agricultural landscape cultivation in Austria: An application of the CVM European Review of Agricultural Economics 22 2 1995 173-190
10. M.H. Tsai A study of paddy rice fieldS'external benefit Operation of Water Resource Consortium 1993 1-66
11. D. Whittington Improving the performance of contingent valuation studies in developing countries Environmental and Resource Economics 22 1-2 2002 323-367
12. Wu, S. L., Chang, K., & Chen, J. C. (2001). Qualitative assessment of temperature mitigation effect from paddy field. Council of Agriculture, Executive Yuan, ROC. Technical Report.
13. Yabe, M., Bergstrom, J. C, & Boyle, K. J. (1999). Comparison of economic value using tax reallocation and special tax payment vehicles: Contingent valuation for protecting ground water quality. Research Paper of National Research Institute of Agricultural Economics.