Measuring the recreational value of agricultural landscape

European Review of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 385-398

  Fleischer, Aliza ^a   Tsur, Yacov ^a,b  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Agricultural landscape; Farmland; Recreation; Travel cost

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846320799     PISSN: 01651587     EISSN: 14643618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/erae/27.3.385     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alterman, R. (1997). The challenge of farmland preservation: lessons from a six-nation comparison. Journal of the American Planning Association Spring 63(2): 220-243.
2. Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Learner, E., Rander, R. and Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register 58: 4601-4614.
3. Bromley, D. W. (1994). Managing rural amenities in the United States. Paper prepared for the OECD Conference on Rural Amenities, Paris.
4. Bromley, D. W. and Hodge, I. (1990). Private property rights and presumptive policy entitlements: reconsidering the premises of rural policy. European Review of Agricultural Economics 17: 197-214.
5. Cameron, T. (1992). Combining contingent valuation and travel cost data for the valuation of nonmarket goods. Land Economics 68(Aug.): 302-317.
6. Clawson, M. and Knetsch, J. L. (1966). Economics of Outdoor Recreation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
7. Cooke, R. and Gough, F. (1997). Permissive access to agricultural land, provided agrienvironment schemes: the current position in England. CRN News 5(4): 114-121.
8. Diamond, P. A. and Hausman, J. A. (1994). Contingent valuation: is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 45-64.
9. Dlayahu, E. and Hadas, E. (1996). Agricultural sector long-term program for the year 2020. Jerusalem: Ministry of Tourism (in Hebrew).
10. Drake, L. (1992). The non-market value of the Swedish agricultural landscape. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1.9: 351-364.
11. Egoz, S. (1996). Israel's citrus grove landscape-an opportunity to balance urbanisation with cultural values. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 183-196.
12. Eviews 3.1 Supplemental Documentation (1998). Irvine CA: Quantitative Micro Software.
13. Feather, P. and Shaw, D. W. (1999). Estimating the cost of leisure time for recreation demand model. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38: 49-65.
14. Fleischer, A. and Pizam, A. (1997). Rural tourism in Israel. Tourism Management 18(6): 367-372.
15. Fleischer, A., Tsur, Y. and Sidi, A. (1997). Estimating the economic value of agricultural landscape as a tourism resource. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ministry of Agriculture (in Hebrew).
16. Fox, M. and Cox, L. J. (1992). Linkage between agriculture and tourism. In: M. A. Khan, M. D. Olsen and T. Var (eds), VNR's Encyclopedia of Hospitality and Tourism. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 781-789.
17. Freeman, A. M. (1992). The Measurement of Environmental and Resources Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Gardner, B. D. (1977). The economics of agricultural land protection programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(4): 1027-1036.
19. Garrod, G. D. and Willis, K. G. (1995). Valuing the benefits of the South Downs environmentally sensitive areas. Journal of Agricultural Economics 46(2): 160-173.
20. Gourieroux, C., Monfort, A. and Trognon, A. (1980). Pseudo maximum likelihood methods: application to Poisson models. Econometrica 52: 710-720.
21. Grogger, J. T. and Carson, R. T. (1991). Models for truncated counts. Journal of Applied Econometrics 6: 225-238.
22. Haab, T. C. and McConnell, K. E. (1996). Count data models and the problem of zeros in recreation demand analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 89-102.
23. Hackl, F. and Pruckner, G. J. (1997). Towards more efficient compensation programs for tourists' benefits from agriculture in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics 10: 189-205.
24. Hanemann, W. M. (1994). Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 19-43.
25. Hanley, N., MacMillan, D., Wright, R. E., Bullock, C., Simpson, I., Parisson, D. and Crabtree, B. (1998). Contingent valuation versus choice experiments: estimating the benefits of environmentally sensitive areas in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49(1): 1-15.
26. Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G. K. & McFadden, D. (1995). A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model-assessing recreational use losses due to natural resources damage. Journal of Public Economics 56: 1-30.
27. Hawes, D. K. (1998). Travel related lifestyle profiles of older women. Journal of Travel Research 27(2): 22-32.
28. Israel Ministry of Agriculture (1996). Agricultural sectors in the years 1994-1995. Tel-Aviv, Israel: Ministry of Agriculture.
29. Kline, J. and Wichelns, D. (1996). Measuring public preferences for the environmental amenities provided by farmland. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23: 421-436.
30. Kling, C. L. (1997). The gain from combining travel cost and contingent valuation data to value nonmarket goods. Land Economics 73(3): 428-439.
31. Loomis, J. B. (1993). An investigation into the reliability of intended visitation behavior. Environmental and Resource Economics 3: 183-191.
32. Maler, K. G. (1974). Environmental Economics: a Theoretical Inquiry. Resources for the Future. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. McConnell, K. E. (1989). The optimal quantity of land in agriculture. Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 18(Oct.): 63-72.
34. McKean, J. R., Walsh, R. G. and Johnson, D. M. (1996). Closely related good prices in the travel cost model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(3): 640-645.
35. Mitchell, R. and Carson, R. (1989). Using Survey to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
36. Nicholson, W. (1972). Microeconomics Theory Basic Principles and Extensions. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
37. OECD (1993). What future for our countryside?-A rural development policy. Paris: OECD.
38. Portney, P. R. (1994). The contingent valuation debate: why economists should care. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(4): 3-17.
39. Pruckner, G. J. (1995). Agricultural landscape cultivation in Austria: an application of the CVM. European Review of Agricultural Economics 22: 173-190.
40. Roberts, E. C. and Roberts, B. C. (1988). Lawn and Sport Turf Benefits. Pleasant Hill, TN: Lawn Institute.
41. Rosenberger, R. S. (1998). Public preferences regarding the goals of farmland preservation programs: comment. Land Economics 74(4): 557-565.
42. Rosenberger, R. S. and Loomis, J. B. (1999). The value of ranch open space to tourists: combining observed and contingent behavior data. Growth and Change 30: 366-383.
43. Walsh, R. G., Johnson, D. M. and McKean, J. R. (1992). Benefit transfer of outdoor recreation demand function Water Resources Research 28(3): 707-713.