Estimating cancer survival and clinical outcome based on genetic tumor progression scores

Bioinformatics

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2438-2446

  Rahnenführer, Jörg ^a   Beerenwinkel, Niko ^a,e   Schulz, Wolfgang A ^b   Hartmann, Christian ^c   von Deimling, Andreas ^c   Wullich, Bernd ^d   Lengauer, Thomas ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS   (Germany)

^b HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RELAPSE; CANCER SURVIVAL; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPUTER PREDICTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC MODEL; GLIOBLASTOMA; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; HUMAN; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL TIME; TUMOR GROWTH;

EID: 19544368188     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti312     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Andersen,P. and Gill,R. (1982) Cox's regression model for counting processes, a large sample study. Annal. Statist., 510, 1100-1120.
2. Beerenwinkel,N. et al. (2005a) Learning multiple evolutionary pathways from cross-sectional data. J. Comput. Biol., in press.
3. Beerenwinkel,N. et al. (2005b) Mtreemix: a software package for learning and using mixture models of mutagenetic trees. Bioinformatics, Advance Access published January 18, 2005. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti274, 21, 2106-2107.
4. Benjamini,Y. and Hochberg,Y. (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 57, 289-300.
5. Cox,D.R. (1972) Regression models and life tables (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B, 34, 187-220.
6. von Deimling,A. et al. (2000) Comprehensive allelotype and genetic anaysis of 466 human nervous system tumors. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol., 59, 544-558.
7. Desper,R. et al. (1999) Inferring tree models for oncogenesis from comparative genome hybridization data. J. Comput. Biol., 6, 37-51.
8. Freije,W.A. et al. (2004) Gene expression profiling of gliomas strongly predicts survival. Cancer Res., 64, 6503-6510.
9. von Heydebreck,A. et al. (2004) Maximum likelihood estimation of oncogenetic tree models. Biostatistics, 5, 545-556.
10. Jiang,F. et al. (2000) Construction of evolutionary tree models for renal cell carcinoma from comparative genomic hybridization data. Cancer Res., 60, 6503-6509.
11. Klein,J.P. and Moeschberger,M.L. (1997) Survival Analysis: Techniques for Censored and Truncated Data. Springer, New York.
12. Ohgaki,H. et al. (2004) Genetic pathways to glioblastoma: a population-based study. Cancer Res., 64, 6892-6899.
13. Development Core Team (2004) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
14. Simon,R. et al. (2000) Chromosome abnormalities in ovarian adenocarcinoma: III. Using breakpoint data to infer and test mathematical models for oncogenesis. Genes Chromosom. Cancer, 28, 106-120.
15. Strohmeyer,D.M. et al. (2004) Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis. Prostate, 59, 43-58.
16. Vogelstein,B. et al. (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N. Engl. J. Med., 319, 525-532.