Daily Disposable Contact Lens Wear in Myopic Children

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 255-259

  Walline, Jeffrey J ^a   Long, Stacy ^a   Zadnik, Karla ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Case series; Contact lenses; Daily disposable contact lenses; Myopia

Indexed keywords

CONTACT LENSES; HEALTH CARE; PERSONNEL TRAINING; REFRACTION;

KERATOMETRY; SLITLAMP EXAMINATION;

OPTOMETERS;

ARTICLE; BIOMICROSCOPY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE REMOVAL; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; MALE; MOTION; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SLIT LAMP; STANDARDIZATION; TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CHILD; CONTACT LENSES; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; HUMANS; MYOPIA; PATIENT SATISFACTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 1942542391     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-200404000-00011     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. JAMA 2003;289:76-9.
2. Sperduto RD, Seigel D, Roberts J, Rowland M. Prevalence of myopia in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:405-7.
3. Blum HL. Vision Screening for Elementary Schools: The Orinda Study. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959.
4. Goss DA. Cessation age of childhood myopia progression. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987;7:195-7.
5. Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS survey. J Refract Surg 2003;19:357-63.
6. Allemann N, Chamon W, Tanaka HM, Mori ES, Campos M, Schor P, Baikoff G. Myopic angle-supported intraocular lenses: two-year follow-up. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1549-54.
7. Burris TE, Ayer CT, Evensen DA, Davenport JM. Effects of intrastromal corneal ring size and thickness on corneal flattening in human eyes. Refract Corneal Surg 1991;7:46-50.
8. Walline JJ, Mutti DO, Jones LA, Rah MJ, Nichols KK, Watson R, Zadnik K. The contact lens and myopia progression (CLAMP) study: design and baseline data. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:223-33.
9. Horner DG, Soni PS, Salmon TO, Swartz TS. Myopia progression in adolescent wearers of soft contact lenses and spectacles. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:474-9.
10. Binder PS. Myopic extended wear with the Hydrocurve II soft contact lens. Ophthalmology 1983;90:623-6.
11. Malet F, Schnider CM. Influence of replacement schedule and care regimen on patient comfort and satisfaction with daily wear frequent-replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 2002;28:124-7.
12. Fan L, Jun J, Jia Q, Wangqing J, Xinjie M, Yi S. Clinical study of orthokeratology in young myopic adolescents. Int Contact Lens Clin 1999;26:113-6.
13. Bailey MD, Walline JJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Visual acuity in contact lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 2001;78:726-31.
14. Suchecki JK, Ehlers WH, Donshik PC. A comparison of contact lens-related complications in various daily wear modalities. CLAO J 2000;26:204-13.
15. Hamano H, Watanabe K, Hamano T, Mitsunaga S, Kotani S, Okada A. A study of the complications induced by conventional and disposable contact lenses. CLAO J 1994;20:103-8.
16. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Daily disposable vs. disposable extended wear: a contact lens clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2000;77:637-47.
17. Nason RJ, Boshnick EL, Cannon WM, Dubow BW, Freeman MI, Kame RT, Lanier JC, Jr., Lopanik RW, Quinn TG, Jr., Rigel LE, et al. Multisite comparison of contact lens modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65:774-80.
18. Snyder C, Hammack GG. Daily disposed hydrogel lenses - a comparison with biweekly replacement. J Am Optom Assoc 1994;65:164-8.
19. Joslin CE, McMahon TT, Kaufman LM. The effectiveness of occluder contact lenses in improving occlusion compliance in patients that have failed traditional occlusion therapy. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:376-80.
20. Chia A, Johnson K, Martin F. Use of contact lenses to correct aphakia in children. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2002;30:252-5.
21. Khoo CY, Chong J, Rajan U. A 3-year study on the effect of RGP contact lenses on myopic children. Singapore Med J 1999;40:230-7.
22. Perrigin J, Perrigin D, Quintero S, Grosvenor T. Silicone-acrylate contact lenses for myopia control: 3-year results. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:764-9.
23. Burger DS, London R. Soft opaque contact lenses in binocular vision problems. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64:176-80.
24. Moore BD. Pediatric aphakic contact lens wear: rates of successful wear. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1993;30:253-8.
25. Jurkus JM. Contact lenses for children. Optom Clin 1996;5:91-104.
26. Rakow PL. Making miracles with prosthetic soft lenses. J Ophthalmic Nurs Technol 1999;18:120-2.
27. Shaughnessy MP, Ellis FJ, Jeffery AR, Szczotka L. Rigid gaspermeable contact lenses are a safe and effective means of treating refractive abnormalities in the pediatric population. CLAO J 2001;27:195-201.
28. Schiefer U, Kurtenbach A, Braun E, Kraus W, Zrenner E. Centrally tinted contact lenses. A useful visual aid for patients with achromatopsia. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:52-6.
29. Ohio State University College of Optometry Pricing Guide. June 2003. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2003.
30. Barr JA. Benefits of daily disposable contact lenses. Contact Lens Spect 2003;18:36-40.
31. Morgan PB, Efron NE, Woods CA, Jones D, Tranoudis Y, van der Worp E, Helland M, Hong AYC, Barr JT, Bailey GN. International Contact Lens Prescribing 2002. Contact Lens Spect 2003;18:40-3.